What is the failure rate of vasectomy and how is failure confirmed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 25, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Vasectomy Failure Rate

Vasectomy has an overall failure rate of less than 1% when performed using recommended techniques, with the best methods achieving rates as low as 0.0-0.55%. 1, 2

Failure Rates by Technique

The American Urological Association analyzed 89 study arms involving 126,821 patients and identified four techniques with acceptable failure rates (≤1%): 1

Recommended Techniques with Lowest Failure Rates:

  • Mucosal cautery with fascial interposition (MC + FI): 0.0-0.55% failure rate across 18,456 patients 1, 2
  • Mucosal cautery without fascial interposition (MC alone): 0.0-1.0% failure rate across 13,851 patients 1, 2
  • Open-ended vasectomy (testicular end open, MC on abdominal end with FI): 0.0-0.50% failure rate across 4,600 patients 1, 2
  • Non-divisional extended electrocautery (Marie Stopes technique): 0.64% failure rate across 41,814 patients 1, 2

Higher-Risk Techniques to Avoid:

  • Ligation alone: 0.0-13.79% failure rate (highly variable) 1
  • Clips alone: 0.0-8.67% failure rate (highly variable) 1
  • Open-ended without fascial interposition: 4.35-4.73% failure rate 1

How Failure is Confirmed

Vasectomy success is determined by post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA), not by histologic examination of the excised vas segment. 1

Timing and Criteria for Success:

  • Perform PVSA at 3 months after vasectomy AND after at least 20 ejaculations 1, 3, 4
  • Success is defined as: Either complete azoospermia OR rare non-motile sperm (RNMS) with <100,000 non-motile sperm/mL 1, 5, 4
  • Only ONE semen specimen showing azoospermia or RNMS is required to confirm sterility 1
  • Specimen must be fresh, uncentrifuged, and examined within 2 hours of ejaculation to accurately assess motility 1

Types of Failure:

Early failures (0.36-0.60%): Persistent motile sperm on PVSA requiring repeat vasectomy 6, 7

Technical failures (1.14%): Persistence of small numbers of sperm that may be clinically insignificant 6

Late failures (0.08%): Recanalization occurring years after confirmed azoospermia, typically presenting as pregnancy 6, 7

Critical Clinical Pitfalls

  • Do NOT require routine histologic examination of excised vas segments—PVSA is the definitive test of success 1
  • Patients must use alternative contraception until PVSA confirms success 1
  • RNMS is acceptable for declaring success: 75% of men with RNMS become azoospermic on subsequent testing, and only 1% progress to failure 5
  • Late recanalization can occur even after two azoospermic results, with a lifetime pregnancy risk of approximately 1 in 2,000 8, 6
  • Surgeon experience matters significantly: Individual surgeon failure rates vary markedly even with the same technique, and experienced surgeons should achieve rates ≤0.2% 7

Real-World Failure Rates

  • Overall pooled failure rate across all techniques: <1% 3, 4
  • Early recanalization rate with optimal technique: 0.36% 7
  • Late recanalization rate: 0.08% (occurring ≥4 years post-procedure) 6
  • Failure rate in large single-surgeon series: 0.60% early overt failures, 0.08% late failures 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Evidence-Based Vasectomy Techniques

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Common questions about vasectomy.

American family physician, 2013

Research

Vasectomy: Common Questions and Answers.

American family physician, 2025

Research

Complications of vasectomy: review of 16,000 patients.

British journal of urology, 1984

Guideline

Vasectomy Coding and Documentation Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.