Short-Course Radiotherapy Protocol for Rectal Cancer
For resectable locally advanced rectal cancer, deliver 25 Gy in 5 fractions of 5 Gy each over 5 consecutive days, followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery within 10 days of the first radiation fraction. 1, 2
Dose and Fractionation Specifications
- Total dose: 25 Gy delivered as 5 Gy per fraction over 5 consecutive days 1, 2
- Treatment schedule: One fraction daily for 5 consecutive days (Monday through Friday) 2
- No concurrent chemotherapy is required with standard short-course radiotherapy 1
Target Volume and Technique
- Target volume includes: 2
- Primary tumor or tumor bed with 2-5 cm margin
- Presacral lymph nodes
- Internal iliac lymph nodes
- Obturator lymph nodes
- Modern radiation techniques (IMRT, VMAT, or helical tomotherapy) should be used to optimize dose distribution 2
Timing of Surgery
Two distinct surgical timing options exist, each with specific indications:
Immediate Surgery Approach (Standard)
- Perform TME surgery within 10 days (ideally 3-5 days) after the first radiation fraction 1, 2
- This approach prioritizes convenience and rapid treatment completion 2
- Provides excellent local control with minimal toxicity 1, 3
Delayed Surgery Approach (Selective)
- Delay surgery for 6-8 weeks after completing radiotherapy 2, 4
- Specific indication: Elderly patients (≥80-85 years) or medically unfit patients who cannot tolerate chemoradiotherapy 1, 2
- This approach allows tumor downstaging similar to long-course chemoradiotherapy 2
Patient Selection Criteria
Short-course radiotherapy is appropriate for:
- Intermediate-risk tumors: Most cT3 tumors without threatened mesorectal fascia (MRI-defined CRM-negative) 1, 2
- Selected cT4a tumors: Those with vaginal or peritoneal involvement only 1, 2
- Node-positive disease (N+) in the intermediate-risk category 1, 2
- Very low cT2 tumors where distance to mesorectal fascia is small 1, 2
- Patients requiring rapid treatment completion 2
Do NOT use short-course radiotherapy for:
- Most locally advanced/non-resectable cases: cT3 with threatened/involved mesorectal fascia (CRM+), cT4 with organ involvement requiring en-bloc resection 1, 2, 5
- Patients requiring maximal tumor downstaging for sphincter preservation 2, 6
- Very early tumors (cT1-2, N0) that can be treated with surgery alone 2, 5
Critical Surgical Considerations
- TME technique is mandatory following any radiotherapy approach 1, 2, 5
- Achieve at least 5 cm distal margin on unfixed specimen 1
- Avoid damaging the mesorectal fascia during dissection, as this significantly impacts local recurrence rates 1
- For low-lying tumors requiring abdominoperineal excision, modify technique to avoid cone-shaped resection that increases risk of positive circumferential resection margin 1
Important Caveats and Pitfalls
Recent evidence reveals a critical concern: The NCCN now includes a specific caution that preoperative short-course radiotherapy may be associated with higher risk of local recurrence compared to long-course chemoradiotherapy (10% vs 6% 5-year locoregional failure rate) 4. Short-course radiotherapy should be avoided when optimal local control is the absolute priority. 4
Higher local recurrence rates occur specifically with:
- Lower third rectal tumors when combined with sphincter-saving surgery (11% vs 0% with long-course) 6
- This finding emphasizes the importance of patient selection based on tumor location 6
Accurate preoperative staging is essential:
- Use high-quality rectal MRI to assess mesorectal fascia involvement, extramural vascular invasion, and distance to circumferential resection margin 2, 5, 4
- Endorectal ultrasound is an alternative for T-staging 5, 6
- Incorrect staging leads to inappropriate treatment selection 5
Preoperative treatment is always superior to postoperative treatment due to better efficacy and reduced toxicity 1, 5
Alternative: Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy
When short-course radiotherapy is inappropriate, use 45-50.4 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy fractions with concurrent 5-FU-based chemotherapy, followed by surgery 6-8 weeks later 1, 5, 4. This approach provides superior tumor downstaging and better local control in high-risk patients 4, 7.