Is Polmacoxib (selective COX‑2 inhibitor) indicated for an adult with symptomatic knee or hip osteoarthritis who is refractory to acetaminophen and has gastrointestinal intolerance to non‑selective NSAIDs, and what are its recommended dose, efficacy compared with placebo and celecoxib, and safety considerations?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 25, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Polmacoxib for Osteoarthritis: Indication, Efficacy, and Safety

Indication

Polmacoxib 2 mg once daily is indicated for adults with symptomatic knee or hip osteoarthritis who have failed acetaminophen and cannot tolerate non-selective NSAIDs due to gastrointestinal intolerance. 1

  • Polmacoxib is a first-in-class dual inhibitor of COX-2 and carbonic anhydrase (CA), designed specifically to minimize gastrointestinal adverse effects compared to traditional NSAIDs while maintaining anti-inflammatory efficacy. 2
  • The dual mechanism is expected to reduce cardiovascular adverse effects while achieving maximum effectiveness in inflamed osteoarthritic joints. 2
  • This agent represents an alternative COX-2 selective inhibitor option for patients who require NSAID therapy but have documented gastrointestinal complications with non-selective NSAIDs. 1

Recommended Dose

The recommended dose is polmacoxib 2 mg orally once daily. 1, 3

  • This single daily dose provides sustained 24-hour symptom control without requiring twice-daily administration. 1
  • No dose titration is required; the therapeutic dose is fixed at 2 mg daily. 1, 3

Efficacy Compared with Placebo

Polmacoxib 2 mg demonstrates superior efficacy to placebo for pain relief in knee and hip osteoarthritis. 1

  • After 6 weeks of treatment, the polmacoxib-placebo treatment difference on the WOMAC pain subscale was -2.5 (95% CI, -4.4 to -0.6; p = 0.011), indicating statistically significant and clinically meaningful pain reduction. 1
  • Improvements in pain were evident by week 3 and maintained through week 6 of treatment. 1
  • According to Physician's Global Assessments, more subjects were rated as "much improved" at week 3 with polmacoxib than with placebo. 1
  • Secondary endpoints including WOMAC-OA Index subscales (pain, stiffness, and physical function) all showed significant improvements over placebo. 1
  • An 18-week open-label extension demonstrated that efficacy was sustained during long-term use. 1

Efficacy Compared with Celecoxib

Polmacoxib 2 mg is non-inferior to celecoxib 200 mg for pain relief and functional improvement in osteoarthritis. 1, 3

  • The polmacoxib-celecoxib treatment difference was 0.6 (95% CI, -0.9 to 2.2; p = 0.425), meeting the pre-specified non-inferiority margin. 1
  • Both agents provided comparable improvements in WOMAC pain, stiffness, and physical function subscales at weeks 3 and 6. 1
  • A 2024 randomized, double-blind study in Indian patients confirmed non-inferior efficacy of polmacoxib 2 mg versus celecoxib 200 mg across all pain assessment scales. 3
  • Polmacoxib showed numerically greater rates of "much improved" status on Physician's Global Assessments at week 3 compared to celecoxib, though both were superior to placebo. 1

Safety Considerations

Gastrointestinal Safety

Polmacoxib has the potential for reduced gastrointestinal side effects compared to traditional non-selective NSAIDs, though gastrointestinal adverse events still occur more frequently than with placebo. 1, 2

  • Gastrointestinal adverse events occurred with greater frequency with polmacoxib than with placebo, but the dual COX-2/CA inhibition mechanism is designed to minimize gastric mucosal damage. 1, 2
  • The carbonic anhydrase inhibitory component is expected to reduce gastric acid secretion, potentially lowering the risk of ulceration compared to pure COX-2 inhibitors. 2
  • In the phase III trial, polmacoxib was relatively well tolerated over 6 weeks, with an acceptable safety profile maintained through 18 weeks of extension treatment. 1
  • For context, celecoxib (a pure COX-2 inhibitor) reduces perforation, ulcers, and bleeding by up to 50% compared to non-selective NSAIDs, and polmacoxib aims to improve upon this profile. 4

Cardiovascular Safety

The dual COX-2/carbonic anhydrase inhibition of polmacoxib is theoretically designed to minimize cardiovascular adverse effects, though long-term cardiovascular safety data remain limited. 2

  • The carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity is expected to reduce cardiovascular risk compared to pure COX-2 inhibitors by modulating vascular tone and fluid balance. 2
  • However, as with all COX-2 selective agents, cardiovascular risk must be considered, particularly in patients with established cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or uncontrolled hypertension. 4
  • Current reports indicate that cardiorenal adverse events occur equally in patients treated with non-selective NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs). 4
  • Polmacoxib should be avoided or used with extreme caution in patients with cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled hypertension (≥140/90 mm Hg), heart failure, or renal insufficiency until more robust long-term safety data are available. 4

Renal Safety

Renal function must be assessed before initiating polmacoxib, and the agent should be avoided in patients with renal insufficiency. 4

  • All COX-2 selective inhibitors, including polmacoxib, carry risk of renal impairment through inhibition of prostaglandin-mediated renal blood flow. 4
  • Elderly patients face substantially higher risks of renal complications with any NSAID or COX-2 inhibitor. 5

General Tolerability

Polmacoxib 2 mg was relatively well tolerated in clinical trials, with adverse event rates comparable to celecoxib. 1, 3

  • General disorder adverse events occurred with greater frequency with polmacoxib or celecoxib than with placebo. 1
  • Withdrawal rates due to adverse events were similar between polmacoxib and celecoxib groups. 1
  • The 18-week extension study demonstrated that polmacoxib can be considered safe for long-term use based on this relatively small-scale study in a Korean population. 1
  • A 2024 study in Indian patients confirmed comparable safety profiles between polmacoxib and celecoxib. 3

Clinical Positioning

Polmacoxib should be reserved for patients who have failed acetaminophen and have documented gastrointestinal intolerance to non-selective NSAIDs, positioning it as a second-line COX-2 selective option. 5

  • According to EULAR guidelines, COX-2 selective agents are indicated in patients with increased risk of gastrointestinal complications who require NSAID therapy. 4
  • Acetaminophen (up to 3000-4000 mg/day) remains the preferred first-line oral analgesic for osteoarthritis due to superior safety. 5
  • Topical NSAIDs should be tried before any oral NSAID or COX-2 inhibitor due to minimal systemic absorption and lower risk profile. 5
  • If polmacoxib is prescribed, it must be co-administered with a proton pump inhibitor for gastroprotection, particularly in elderly patients or those with prior gastrointestinal events. 5
  • Use the lowest effective dose for the shortest necessary duration, and reassess need for continued therapy every 4-6 weeks. 4

Critical Contraindications and Precautions

  • Absolute contraindications: Active peptic ulcer disease, severe heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, severe renal insufficiency (CrCl <30 mL/min), and known hypersensitivity to COX-2 inhibitors. 4, 5
  • Relative contraindications: Age ≥65 years (independent cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risk factor), mild-moderate renal impairment, cardiovascular disease, and concurrent anticoagulation. 4, 5
  • Mandatory monitoring: Baseline and periodic renal function, blood pressure monitoring, and assessment for signs of fluid retention or heart failure exacerbation. 4, 5
  • Drug interactions: Polmacoxib, like celecoxib, does not interfere with the antiplatelet effect of low-dose aspirin (unlike some non-selective NSAIDs). 5

Evidence Limitations

  • Most polmacoxib data come from relatively small-scale studies in Korean and Indian populations; generalizability to other ethnic groups requires confirmation. 1, 3
  • Long-term cardiovascular and renal safety data beyond 24 weeks are lacking. 1
  • Head-to-head comparisons with other COX-2 inhibitors (beyond celecoxib) are not available. 1, 3
  • The theoretical cardiovascular benefit of dual COX-2/CA inhibition has not been definitively proven in large outcome trials. 2

Related Questions

What is the recommended use of Polmacoxib for arthritis treatment?
Is it advisable for a 68-year-old male with hip osteoarthritis, currently taking celecoxib (celecoxib) 200mg once daily, to use diclofenac (diclofenac) 2% gel for increased hip pain?
What alternative treatment options are available for an older adult with a history of osteoarthritis, who has been experiencing persistent pain in their hands, arms, and shoulders for several months, despite being treated with Celebrex (celecoxib) and Omeprazole (omeprazole)?
What is the recommended celecoxib (Celebrex) dosing for an adult with chronic knee osteoarthritis experiencing an acute flare?
Can a patient taking apixaban take celecoxib (Celebrex) for arthritis pain?
In a 47‑year‑old man with hypertension, dyslipidemia, no chest pain, an abnormal stress echocardiogram showing inducible ischemia, and a coronary artery calcium score of 2000 Agatston units, should we proceed with invasive coronary angiography?
What is the recommended dosing schedule for the 9‑valent human papillomavirus vaccine (Gardasil 9) based on age and immune status?
Is pitavastatin appropriate for an adult patient who needs lipid‑lowering therapy (e.g., elevated low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‑C), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), or high 10‑year ASCVD risk), especially if they have experienced statin‑associated muscle symptoms and have no contraindications such as active liver disease, pregnancy, or significant drug interactions?
What standard textbook reference describes the fluctuating level of consciousness in hypoactive delirium due to Wernicke encephalopathy in a 49‑year‑old chronic alcoholic?
What is the appropriate diagnosis for a patient with a urinary tract infection, fever, dysuria, flank pain, positive urine culture and organ dysfunction meeting a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) increase ≥2 (or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) ≥2)?
What is the appropriate treatment regimen with dosing and duration for an adult patient with suspected Wernicke encephalopathy and alcohol withdrawal, including high‑dose thiamine, folic acid, multivitamin, magnesium and potassium replacement, dextrose administration, a symptom‑triggered benzodiazepine protocol, and low‑dose antipsychotic if agitation occurs?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.