What is the preferred first‑line systemic therapy for a patient with lung adenocarcinoma that harbors a ROS1 rearrangement?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 25, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

First-Line Treatment for ROS1-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma

For treatment-naïve patients with ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma, crizotinib, entrectinib, or repotrectinib are the preferred first-line targeted therapies, with crizotinib being the most established option demonstrating 70-80% response rates and median progression-free survival of 19.2 months. 1, 2

Preferred First-Line Options

The NCCN guidelines designate three agents as preferred first-line therapies for ROS1-positive metastatic NSCLC 1, 2:

Crizotinib (Most Established)

  • Crizotinib remains the gold standard first-line option based on FDA approval and the most robust clinical trial data 1
  • Achieves objective response rates of 70-80%, including complete responses in some patients 1
  • The PROFILE 1001 phase I study demonstrated a 72% objective response rate with median progression-free survival of 19.2 months and median overall survival of 51.4 months 1
  • The EUCROSS phase II study confirmed a 70% objective response rate with median PFS of 20 months 1
  • An Asian phase II trial in 127 patients showed 71.7% response rate with median PFS of 15.9 months 1
  • Crizotinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting ALK, ROS1, and MET 1

Entrectinib (Superior CNS Penetration)

  • Entrectinib is FDA-approved for first-line treatment and offers critical advantages for patients with brain metastases 1, 2, 3
  • Pooled analysis from three trials (STARTRK-1, STARTRK-2, ALKA-372-001) showed 77% objective response rate in 53 treatment-naïve ROS1-positive patients 1
  • Intracranial response rate was 55% among 20 patients with baseline CNS metastases, including 4 complete responses 1
  • The key advantage is superior CNS penetration compared to crizotinib, making it particularly valuable for patients with brain involvement 1, 2
  • The main limitation is higher toxicity: grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 34% of patients, with serious adverse events including nervous system and cardiac disorders 1
  • Entrectinib inhibits ROS1, ALK, and TRK kinases 1, 3

Repotrectinib (Newest Option)

  • Repotrectinib is FDA-approved as a preferred first-line option, particularly for patients with CNS involvement 1, 2
  • The TRIDENT-1 trial demonstrated 79% confirmed objective response rate in 71 treatment-naïve ROS1-positive patients 1
  • Repotrectinib is a next-generation ROS1, TRK, and ALK inhibitor 1

Alternative First-Line Option

Ceritinib (Less Preferred)

  • Ceritinib may be considered in crizotinib-naïve patients but is not a preferred option 1
  • A phase II trial showed 62% objective response rate with median PFS of 19.3 months in crizotinib-naïve patients 1
  • Ceritinib is an oral TKI inhibiting ROS1 and IGF-1 receptor 1

Clinical Decision Algorithm

Choose your first-line ROS1 inhibitor based on:

  1. Presence of brain metastases: If CNS involvement is present or suspected, prioritize entrectinib or repotrectinib over crizotinib due to superior CNS penetration 1, 2

  2. Toxicity tolerance: If patient has cardiac risk factors or concerns about nervous system adverse events, crizotinib may be preferred over entrectinib due to lower toxicity profile 1

  3. Drug availability and access: Crizotinib has the longest track record and may have better insurance coverage in some settings 1

Critical Testing Requirements

  • ROS1 testing must be performed using FISH or FDA-approved tests on tumor tissue before initiating therapy 2, 4
  • Plasma testing is only appropriate when tumor tissue is unavailable 2
  • ROS1 rearrangements occur in approximately 1-2% of NSCLC patients, more commonly in younger patients, women, adenocarcinoma histology, and never-smokers 1, 4
  • Next-generation sequencing can detect ROS1 rearrangements if the platform has been appropriately validated 1, 5

Important Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use alectinib or other ALK-specific inhibitors for ROS1-positive disease - they are not effective despite structural similarities between ALK and ROS1 1
  • Do not delay treatment waiting for additional molecular testing once ROS1 rearrangement is confirmed 4
  • Avoid platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line when a ROS1 rearrangement is identified - targeted therapy is vastly superior 1
  • In patients with biomarkers who have progressed on targeted therapy, immunotherapy appears less effective regardless of PD-L1 expression 1, 4

Subsequent Therapy Considerations

When patients progress on first-line ROS1 TKI therapy 1, 2:

  • For progression after crizotinib or ceritinib: repotrectinib or lorlatinib are recommended targeted options 2
  • For CNS progression: entrectinib, repotrectinib, or lorlatinib with consideration of stereotactic radiosurgery 2
  • Platinum-based chemotherapy (carboplatin/pemetrexed for nonsquamous) may be considered 1
  • Strongly consider rebiopsy with tissue-based testing at progression to identify resistance mechanisms 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of ROS1-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment Approach for Lung Cancer with Unprovoked Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.