Heart Failure: Definition, Classification, Diagnostic Testing, and Treatment
Definition
Heart failure is a clinical syndrome characterized by symptoms and/or signs caused by structural and/or functional cardiac abnormality, corroborated by elevated natriuretic peptide levels and/or objective evidence of pulmonary or systemic congestion. 1
The diagnosis requires three components 2:
- Typical symptoms: breathlessness at rest or on exertion, fatigue, ankle swelling 2
- Typical signs: tachycardia, pulmonary rales, pleural effusion, elevated jugular venous pressure, peripheral edema, hepatomegaly 2
- Objective cardiac abnormality: structural or functional abnormality on echocardiography, elevated natriuretic peptides, or evidence of congestion 2, 1
Classification
By Ejection Fraction (EF)
The universal classification divides heart failure into four phenotypes based on left ventricular ejection fraction 2, 1:
| Category | LVEF Range | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| HFrEF (reduced EF) | ≤40% | Symptomatic HF with reduced ejection fraction [2,1] |
| HFmrEF (mildly reduced EF) | 41–49% | Symptomatic HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction [2,1] |
| HFpEF (preserved EF) | ≥50% | Symptomatic HF with preserved ejection fraction [2,1] |
| HFimpEF (improved EF) | Baseline ≤40%, now >40% | ≥10-point increase from baseline LVEF ≤40% to >40% [2,1] |
By Clinical Stage
The ACC/AHA staging system classifies patients by disease progression 2, 1:
- Stage A (At Risk): Risk factors present (hypertension, diabetes, coronary disease) but no structural heart disease or symptoms 1
- Stage B (Pre-HF): Structural heart disease present but no symptoms 1
- Stage C (Symptomatic HF): Structural heart disease with current or prior symptoms 1
- Stage D (Advanced HF): Refractory symptoms despite maximal medical therapy, requiring advanced interventions 1
Diagnostic Laboratory Testing
Natriuretic Peptides: Sensitivity and Specificity
BNP and NT-proBNP are primarily valuable for ruling out heart failure rather than confirming it, with excellent negative predictive value but only moderate specificity. 2, 3
Non-Acute (Ambulatory) Thresholds
| Test | Rule-Out Threshold | Sensitivity | NPV | Specificity | PPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNP | <35 pg/mL | 90–97% [2,3] | 94–98% [2,3] | 60–76% [2,3] | 44–57% [2] |
| NT-proBNP | <125 pg/mL | 99% [2,3] | 98–99% [2,3] | 60–76% [2,3] | 44–57% [2] |
Acute (Emergency Department) Thresholds
| Test | Rule-Out Threshold | Sensitivity | NPV | Rule-In Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNP | <100 pg/mL | 90% [2,3] | 94% [2,3] | >400 pg/mL [3] |
| NT-proBNP | <300 pg/mL | 99% [2,3] | 98% [2,3] | Age-adjusted (see below) [2,3] |
Age-Adjusted NT-proBNP Thresholds (ESC)
| Age | Rule-Out | Rule-In |
|---|---|---|
| <50 years | <300 pg/mL [2,3] | >450 pg/mL [2,3] |
| 50–75 years | <300 pg/mL [2,3] | >900 pg/mL [2,3] |
| >75 years | <300 pg/mL [2,3] | >1,800 pg/mL [2,3] |
Critical Adjustments for Special Populations
Obesity significantly reduces BNP/NT-proBNP levels, with each BMI unit decrease correlating with lower natriuretic peptide concentrations; severe obesity (BMI >35 kg/m²) reduces sensitivity for detecting heart failure. 3, 4
Chronic kidney disease elevates natriuretic peptides independent of cardiac status; when GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m², raise BNP rule-out threshold to 200–225 pg/mL and NT-proBNP to 1,200 pg/mL. 3
Atrial fibrillation raises BNP by approximately 20–30% independent of heart failure; standard thresholds are unreliable and higher cut-offs must be applied (NT-proBNP >1,500 pg/mL suggests possible structural disease; >3,000 pg/mL strongly suggests heart failure). 3
Important Limitations
BNP cannot distinguish between HFrEF and HFpEF, though values tend to be lower in HFpEF; approximately 29% of symptomatic HFpEF patients have BNP ≤100 pg/mL despite elevated filling pressures. 5, 6
False-positive elevations occur with acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, severe COPD, and renal failure; confirmatory echocardiography is mandatory for positive results. 2, 3
Imaging: Echocardiography
Transthoracic echocardiography is the primary imaging modality for diagnosing heart failure, determining ejection fraction phenotype, and identifying structural abnormalities. 2
Essential Echocardiographic Parameters
For HFpEF diagnosis, the following structural and functional criteria must be assessed 2:
Structural Criteria
- Left atrial volume index (LAVI) >34 mL/m² 2
- Left ventricular mass index (LVMI): ≥115 g/m² (males), ≥95 g/m² (females) 2
Functional Criteria
- E/e′ ratio ≥13 indicates elevated filling pressures 2
- Mean e′ velocity (septal and lateral) <9 cm/s 2
- Tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.8 m/s 2
The E/e′ ratio has a pooled correlation coefficient of 0.56 with invasively measured filling pressures in HFpEF, demonstrating only modest correlation; no single parameter is sufficient for diagnosis. 2
Treatment Guidelines by Phenotype
HFrEF (LVEF ≤40%): Quadruple Therapy
Immediate initiation of four-drug guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is a Class I recommendation for all patients with HFrEF 2:
- ARNI (sacubitril-valsartan) or ACE-inhibitor/ARB 2
- Beta-blocker (carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, or bisoprolol) 2
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (spironolactone or eplerenone) 2
- SGLT2 inhibitor (empagliflozin or dapagliflozin) 2, 4
Loop diuretics should be titrated to relieve congestion; therapy should begin in the emergency department without delay, as early intervention improves outcomes. 2
HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%): Disease-Modifying Therapy
SGLT2 inhibitors (empagliflozin or dapagliflozin) are first-line disease-modifying therapy for HFpEF and should be initiated in all patients to reduce cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalizations. 2, 4
Additional therapies for HFpEF include 2, 4:
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists to reduce morbidity and mortality 4
- Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors may be considered for selected patients, though evidence shows smaller reductions in HF hospitalizations compared to HFrEF 4
- Loop diuretics used judiciously as needed to reduce congestion, not as disease-modifying therapy 4
Beta-blockers are not routinely recommended for HFpEF unless specific indications exist (prior MI, angina, atrial fibrillation). 4
HFmrEF (LVEF 41–49%)
Patients with HFmrEF should be treated similarly to HFrEF with quadruple GDMT, as this phenotype represents a transitional state. 2
Critical Management Principles
Aggressive management of comorbidities is mandatory in HFpEF, as hypertension, diabetes, obesity, atrial fibrillation, coronary disease, and chronic kidney disease directly contribute to symptoms and prognosis. 4
Before confirming HFpEF diagnosis, systematically exclude mimics requiring different treatment: cardiac amyloidosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis, Fabry disease, high-output heart failure, and pericardial disease. 4, 7
BNP-guided titration of GDMT is associated with higher medication doses and improved clinical outcomes; a reduction >30–50% signals adequate therapeutic response. 3, 8