What was the dosage of diosmin and hesperidin used in that study?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 25, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diosmin and Hesperidin Dosing in Chronic Venous Insufficiency Studies

Dosing Regimen in the Comparative Trial

The micronized formulation (Daflon 500 mg) used 450 mg of diosmin plus 50 mg of hesperidin per tablet, administered as two tablets daily (total: 900 mg diosmin + 100 mg hesperidin per day), while the comparator arm received an equivalent dose of non-micronized diosmin (900 mg daily). 1

Study Design and Administration

  • The randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial enrolled 90 patients with chronic venous insufficiency who received either two tablets of Daflon 500 mg or an equivalent dose of non-micronized diosmin, divided into two doses daily for two months. 1

  • Each Daflon 500 mg tablet contained a micronized purified flavonoidic fraction consisting of 450 mg diosmin and 50 mg hesperidin, formulated to enhance gastrointestinal absorption. 1

Clinical Outcomes with This Dosing

  • The micronized formulation at 900 mg diosmin + 100 mg hesperidin daily produced statistically superior improvements in all clinical symptoms and plethysmographic parameters (maximum venous volume increase at 60 mmHg and total emptying time) compared to 900 mg non-micronized diosmin alone. 1

  • Patient satisfaction was significantly higher with the micronized formulation (95%) versus non-micronized diosmin (80%, p < 0.01), despite similar clinical and laboratory safety profiles in both groups. 1

Evidence Challenging Higher Doses

More recent evidence suggests that 600 mg daily of pure non-micronized diosmin achieves equivalent clinical efficacy to the 1000 mg daily MPFF formulation (900 mg diosmin + 100 mg hesperidin), questioning whether doses above 600 mg or the addition of hesperidin provide additional clinical benefit. 2

  • Three well-conducted randomized clinical studies comparing diosmin 600 mg daily versus MPFF 1000 mg daily showed significant decreases in chronic venous disorder symptom intensity (up to approximately 50%) and high global patient satisfaction after one-to-six months of treatment, with no statistical differences between the two formulations. 2

  • Both the 600 mg non-micronized diosmin and 1000 mg MPFF formulations were well tolerated with few mild adverse reactions, suggesting no clinical advantage to increasing the dose beyond 600 mg per day, using micronization, or adding hesperidin. 2

Related Questions

What is the recommended dose of diosmin (flavanoid) hesperidin (vitamin P) for a 13-year-old patient?
What is Diosmin Hesperidin in English?
What are the diosmin and hesperidin contents of Alermor (micronized purified flavonoid fraction) used in the 2026 study?
What are the guidelines for using Diasmin (diosmin) plus hesperidin suppository in patients with vascular-related conditions, particularly those with a history of bleeding disorders or taking anticoagulant medications?
Can a pregnant woman safely use diosmin‑hesperidin (600 mg diosmin + 100 mg hesperidin) for chronic venous insufficiency or hemorrhoids?
What is the recommended polio vaccination schedule for a 47‑year‑old man with no documented polio immunization, and are there any special considerations such as imminent travel?
What is Slynd (drospirenone) used for?
How do I determine if a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus is controlled or uncontrolled?
Can a non‑contrast CT scan detect non‑inflamed colonic diverticula, such as those seen in older adults?
In a woman with documented low serum testosterone and hypoactive sexual desire unresponsive to non‑pharmacologic measures, when is testosterone therapy indicated, what starting dose and formulation should be used, and how should treatment be monitored and duration limited?
In a 72-year-old man with stage 2 chronic kidney disease and a serum vitamin B12 of 834 pg/mL, does the provider’s refusal to perform malabsorption testing change whether he should continue sublingual methylcobalamin supplementation?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.