What are the 2026 guidelines for pulmonary embolism diagnosis, risk stratification, and management?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 26, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

2026 Guidelines for Pulmonary Embolism

Diagnosis

Clinical Probability Assessment

Use a validated prediction rule (Wells or revised Geneva score) to stratify every patient with suspected PE into low, intermediate, or high clinical probability before ordering any tests. 1, 2

  • Immediately assess for hemodynamic instability—defined as shock, cardiac arrest, obstructive shock (systolic BP <90 mmHg with vasopressor requirement), or persistent hypotension (systolic BP <90 mmHg or drop ≥40 mmHg lasting >15 minutes not caused by arrhythmia, hypovolemia, or sepsis)—to identify high-risk PE requiring urgent reperfusion therapy 1, 2

  • The revised Geneva score assigns points for: previous PE/DVT (3 points), heart rate 75-94 bpm (3 points) or ≥95 bpm (5 points), surgery/fracture within past month (2 points), hemoptysis (2 points), active cancer (2 points), unilateral leg pain (3 points), pain on deep venous palpation with unilateral edema (4 points), and age >65 years (1 point) 1

  • Low probability = 0-3 points; intermediate = 4-10 points; high ≥11 points on the original Geneva score 1

D-dimer Testing

Measure D-dimer only in patients with low or intermediate clinical probability (or "PE unlikely") using a highly sensitive assay; do not measure D-dimer in high-probability patients because a normal result does not safely exclude PE. 1, 2

  • A normal D-dimer in low- or intermediate-probability patients permits exclusion of PE without further imaging 2

  • Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs (age × 10 µg/L for patients >50 years) can be used as an alternative to the fixed cut-off value 1

Imaging Strategy

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the first-choice imaging test for hemodynamically stable patients with elevated D-dimer or high clinical probability. 1, 2

  • Accept a PE diagnosis when CTPA shows a segmental or more proximal filling defect in patients with intermediate or high clinical probability 1, 2

  • Reject a PE diagnosis when CTPA is normal in patients with low or intermediate clinical probability 1, 2

  • For suspected high-risk PE, perform bedside echocardiography or emergency CTPA depending on local availability and patient stability 2, 3

  • Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy is a valid alternative when CTPA is contraindicated (e.g., contrast allergy, renal impairment); a normal perfusion scan excludes PE 1, 2

  • Do not perform CT venography as an adjunct to CTPA 1, 2

  • Do not use magnetic resonance angiography to rule out PE 1, 2

  • A proximal deep-vein thrombosis identified by compression ultrasound in a patient with suspected PE confirms venous thromboembolism and justifies anticoagulation 1, 2

Avoiding Overuse of Testing

  • The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC)—age <50 years, pulse <100 bpm, SaO₂ >94%, no unilateral leg swelling, no hemoptysis, no recent trauma/surgery, no history of VTE, and no oral hormone use—can identify emergency department patients with such low PE probability that diagnostic workup should not be initiated 1

Risk Stratification

High-Risk PE

High-risk PE is defined by the presence of shock, cardiac arrest, obstructive shock, or persistent hypotension and carries early mortality potentially exceeding 30%. 1, 3, 4

  • These patients require immediate reperfusion therapy (systemic thrombolysis or surgical embolectomy) 3, 4

  • Confirmation can be made with bedside echocardiography showing right ventricular (RV) dysfunction or emergency CTPA 3

Intermediate-Risk PE

Intermediate-risk PE comprises hemodynamically stable patients with evidence of RV dysfunction (on echocardiography or CTPA) and/or elevated cardiac biomarkers (troponin, BNP/NT-proBNP). 1, 3

  • Intermediate-high risk: both RV dysfunction and biomarker elevation present 3

  • Intermediate-low risk: only one of the two markers present 3

  • These patients require hospitalization with close monitoring and rescue thrombolysis if clinical deterioration occurs 3, 4

Low-Risk PE

Low-risk PE is characterized by hemodynamically stable patients without RV dysfunction or myocardial injury markers, with mortality <1%. 3, 4

  • The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) or simplified PESI (sPESI) should be used to identify patients suitable for outpatient management 3, 4, 5

  • PESI class I/II or sPESI score of 0 identifies low-risk patients who are candidates for early discharge or outpatient treatment 3, 5

  • Key PESI predictors include age, cancer, systolic BP <100 mmHg, altered mental status, heart rate >110/min, and SaO₂ <90% 4, 5


Acute-Phase Treatment

High-Risk PE Management

Initiate intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) without delay using a weight-adjusted bolus (80 units/kg or 5,000-10,000 units) followed by continuous infusion (18 units/kg/hour or 30,000-40,000 units/24 hours), even before imaging confirmation. 2

  • Maintain activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 1.5-2.5 times control, measured 4-6 hours after initiation 2

  • Administer systemic thrombolytic therapy immediately to all high-risk PE patients who do not have a high bleeding risk. 1, 2, 3

  • Alteplase (rtPA) is the preferred agent: 100 mg infused over 2 hours, or 0.6 mg/kg over 15 minutes (maximum 50 mg) 2

  • Thrombolysis reduces mortality or recurrence in massive PE (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.92) but carries a 21.9% major bleeding risk versus 11.9% with heparin alone 2

  • In life-threatening PE, traditional contraindications to thrombolysis should be ignored; the mortality benefit supersedes bleeding concerns. 2

  • Surgical pulmonary embolectomy is indicated when thrombolysis is absolutely contraindicated or fails to improve hemodynamics within one hour 1, 2

  • Catheter-based embolectomy or thrombus fragmentation may be considered when surgery is unavailable 2

  • Provide rescue thrombolysis if hemodynamic deterioration occurs despite anticoagulation 1, 2

Hemodynamic Support

  • Administer high-flow oxygen for hypoxemia correction 2

  • Use vasopressor agents (norepinephrine preferred) for hypotensive patients 2

  • Dobutamine and dopamine may be used in patients with low cardiac output and normal blood pressure 2

  • Avoid aggressive fluid challenges—this worsens right ventricular failure. 2, 4

  • Avoid diuretics and vasodilators as they may precipitate cardiovascular collapse 2

Intermediate- and Low-Risk PE Management

Start anticoagulation immediately in patients with high or intermediate clinical probability while diagnostic work-up proceeds. 1, 2

  • For parenteral anticoagulation in hemodynamically stable patients, prefer low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux over UFH 1, 2

  • Do not use systemic thrombolysis as routine primary treatment in intermediate- or low-risk PE. 1, 2, 4

  • Rescue thrombolysis should be considered if hemodynamic deterioration occurs despite anticoagulation 4


Oral Anticoagulation Selection

Prefer a non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulant (NOAC)—apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran—over a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) when initiating oral therapy. 1, 2, 4, 6

  • NOACs offer simplified dosing without need for routine laboratory monitoring and have a potentially improved safety profile compared to traditional anticoagulants 6

  • If a VKA (warfarin) is chosen, overlap with parenteral anticoagulation until the INR reaches 2.0-3.0 on two consecutive measurements taken at least 24 hours apart (target INR 2.5) 1, 2

  • Do not use NOACs in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <25-30 mL/min) or antiphospholipid antibody syndrome; these patients must receive a VKA indefinitely. 1, 2

  • For cancer-associated PE, edoxaban or rivaroxaban should be considered as alternatives to LMWH, with caution in gastrointestinal cancers due to increased bleeding risk 1, 4

  • During pregnancy, use therapeutic fixed-dose LMWH based on early-pregnancy weight; NOACs are contraindicated in pregnancy and lactation 1, 2


Duration of Anticoagulation

All patients with PE require therapeutic anticoagulation for a minimum of 3 months, followed by mandatory reassessment at 3-6 months to decide on continuation. 1, 2

Provoked PE

Discontinue anticoagulation after 3 months in patients whose first PE was provoked by a major transient/reversible risk factor (e.g., surgery, trauma, immobilization, pregnancy). 1, 2

Unprovoked PE

Extend anticoagulation indefinitely beyond 3 months for unprovoked PE when bleeding risk is low-to-moderate; the annual recurrence risk exceeds 5% and outweighs bleeding risk. 1, 2

  • The 2019 ESC guideline no longer supports terminology such as "provoked" versus "unprovoked" PE/VTE, as it is potentially misleading; instead, classify risk factors as high, intermediate, or low recurrence risk 1

  • A reduced dose of apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) or rivaroxaban (10 mg daily) for extended anticoagulation should be considered after the first 6 months of treatment 1

Recurrent VTE

Continue oral anticoagulation indefinitely in patients with recurrent VTE (≥1 prior episode of PE or DVT) not related to a major transient risk factor. 1, 2

Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome

Continue VKA therapy indefinitely in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome; NOACs are contraindicated. 1, 2

Monitoring During Extended Therapy

  • Re-assess patients at 3-6 months and then yearly for drug tolerance, adherence, hepatic/renal function, and bleeding risk 1, 2

  • VTE recurrence scores and bleeding scores should be used in parallel to guide decisions about extended anticoagulation 1


Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter Placement

Do not routinely place IVC filters; reserve them only for patients with absolute contraindications to anticoagulation (e.g., active major bleeding) or who experience recurrent PE despite adequate anticoagulation. 1, 2


Follow-Up and CTEPH Screening

Re-examine all patients 3-6 months after acute PE to evaluate persistent dyspnea, functional limitation, signs of VTE recurrence, cancer, or bleeding complications. 1, 2

  • An integrated model of patient care after PE is proposed to ensure optimal transition from hospital to community care 1

  • If persistent or new-onset dyspnea or functional limitation is present at the 3-6 month review, perform ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy to detect mismatched perfusion defects suggestive of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) 1, 2

  • Refer symptomatic patients with persistent perfusion defects to a specialized CTEPH center, considering echocardiography, natriuretic peptide levels, and/or cardiopulmonary exercise testing results 1, 2

  • Schedule regular follow-up visits at yearly intervals for patients on extended anticoagulation 2

  • Follow-up imaging is not routinely required in asymptomatic patients but may be considered in those with risk factors for CTEPH (unprovoked PE, large perfusion defects, RV dysfunction, hypothyroidism, diabetes) 2


Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never delay anticoagulation in high- or intermediate-probability PE while awaiting diagnostic confirmation. 1, 2

  • Never measure D-dimer in high-clinical-probability patients; proceed directly to imaging. 1, 2

  • Never use NOACs in severe renal impairment (<25-30 mL/min) or antiphospholipid antibody syndrome; VKA is mandatory. 1, 2

  • Never discontinue anticoagulation at 3 months in unprovoked PE without weighing bleeding risk; the annual recurrence exceeds 5%. 2

  • Never lose patients to follow-up after acute PE; routine reassessment at 3-6 months is essential for detecting CTEPH and guiding anticoagulation duration. 1, 2

  • Never ignore persistent dyspnea, as it may indicate CTEPH requiring specialized evaluation. 1, 2

  • Never withhold thrombolysis in massive PE solely because of relative contraindications; contraindications should be set aside in life-threatening situations. 2

  • Never use aggressive fluid resuscitation in high-risk PE; this worsens right ventricular failure. 2, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Pulmonary Embolism – Evidence‑Based Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Risk Stratification of Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Risk-Based Management of Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.