Fibromuscular Dysplasia of the Internal Carotid Artery
Diagnosis
In a young woman presenting with hypertension, neck bruit, and TIAs, immediately obtain contrast-enhanced CTA or MRA from head to pelvis to confirm carotid FMD and assess for systemic involvement. 1
Key Diagnostic Imaging Strategy
- First-line imaging: Contrast-enhanced CTA or MRA extending from head to pelvis is Class I recommended to diagnose carotid FMD and evaluate other arterial territories simultaneously 1
- Pathognomonic finding: The "string-of-beads" pattern (beads larger than normal arterial diameter) confirms medial fibroplasia, which accounts for 80-85% of FMD cases 1, 2
- Location matters: Carotid FMD characteristically involves the mid-to-distal segments of the internal carotid artery bilaterally, distinguishing it from atherosclerosis which affects proximal/ostial segments 1, 2
- Duplex ultrasonography can detect flow abnormalities but is less reliable for morphologic diagnosis compared to cross-sectional imaging 1
- Catheter angiography is reserved for cases with high clinical suspicion despite inconclusive non-invasive studies 3, 1
Additional Imaging Findings to Identify
- Focal concentric or tubular stenosis (suggests intimal fibroplasia subtype) 1
- Arterial elongation, kinking, coiling, weblike lesions, or aneurysmal dilation 3, 1
- Dissection features: intramural hematoma, dissection flap, or pseudoaneurysm 1
- Concurrent brain MRI or CT should be performed, as 50-95% of carotid dissection patients develop cerebral or retinal ischemia 1
Screen for Complications
- Intracranial aneurysms: Screen for subarachnoid hemorrhage risk, as aneurysms are a recognized complication 3, 2
- Dissection risk: Approximately 12-15% of carotid FMD patients develop spontaneous arterial dissection 1, 4
- Evaluate for cranial nerve IX-XII palsies and Horner syndrome (ptosis, miosis, anhidrosis) 1, 2
Treatment Algorithm
For Symptomatic Carotid FMD (TIA/Stroke)
Initiate antiplatelet therapy immediately (aspirin or clopidogrel) and reserve percutaneous angioplasty with or without stenting for patients with recurrent ischemic symptoms despite optimal medical management. 1, 4
Step 1: Immediate Medical Therapy
- Antiplatelet therapy: Start aspirin or clopidogrel immediately for all symptomatic patients 1, 4
- Blood pressure control: Target <140/90 mmHg using ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or calcium channel blockers 4
- Beta-blockers or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem) may theoretically reduce arterial wall stress, though effectiveness remains unproven (Class IIb evidence) 3
Step 2: Assess for Dissection
- If dissection is present with ischemic symptoms, initiate 3-6 months of antithrombotic therapy (Class IIa) 3, 1:
- After 3-6 months, transition all patients to lifelong antiplatelet therapy 1
Step 3: Consider Revascularization
- Indication: Recurrent ischemic events (TIA or stroke) despite optimal antiplatelet therapy 3, 1
- Preferred method: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting (Class IIb for dissection with persistent symptoms) 3, 1
- Both surgical revascularization and endovascular approaches have been successful, though evidence is limited to case series (Level C) 3, 5
For Asymptomatic Carotid FMD
Revascularization is NOT recommended for asymptomatic carotid FMD regardless of stenosis severity (Class III: No Benefit). 3, 4
- Medical management only: Antiplatelet therapy (aspirin or clopidogrel) for all asymptomatic patients 1, 4
- Sequential imaging surveillance: CTA or MRA annually for the first year, then at extended intervals once stability is documented 1
Surveillance Protocol
- Initial surveillance: Annual non-invasive imaging (CTA or MRA) of carotid arteries for the first year to detect disease progression, new dissection, or aneurysmal change 1, 2
- Long-term surveillance: Reduce imaging frequency once stability is confirmed over time 1, 2
- Dissection follow-up: Vascular imaging at 1 month, 6 months, then annually to monitor vessel healing and patency 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume atherosclerosis in young women with carotid stenosis; bilateral involvement, mid-to-distal location, and beading pattern distinguish FMD 1, 2
- Do not revascularize asymptomatic lesions regardless of stenosis severity—this is a Class III (No Benefit) recommendation 3, 4
- Maintain high suspicion for dissection in ~15% of patients—new neck pain, Horner syndrome, or worsening neurologic deficits warrant urgent evaluation 1, 2
- Do not overlook systemic involvement—FMD is a systemic arteriopathy requiring comprehensive vascular evaluation from head to pelvis at diagnosis 1, 4
- Symptoms arise from two mechanisms: (1) reduced cerebral perfusion from stenosis and (2) thromboembolism from irregular arterial surfaces serving as platelet-adhesion sites 3, 2