In a 45‑year‑old otherwise healthy adult with single‑level cervical disc disease, intact facet joints, no radiographic instability or osteoporosis, should I recommend cervical arthroplasty (artificial disc replacement) rather than anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 26, 2026 • View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cervical Arthroplasty vs Fusion for Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease

For a 45-year-old healthy adult with single-level cervical disc disease, intact facet joints, no instability or osteoporosis, cervical arthroplasty (artificial disc replacement) is superior to ACDF and should be recommended as the preferred surgical option. 1, 2

Evidence Supporting Arthroplasty Superiority

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

  • At 10 years, cervical disc arthroplasty demonstrates statistically superior composite success rates compared to ACDF (62.4% vs 22.2%, p<0.0001), representing a nearly 3-fold advantage in overall clinical success. 2

  • The cumulative risk of subsequent surgery at 10 years is dramatically lower with arthroplasty versus fusion (7.2% vs 25.5%, p=0.001), meaning ACDF patients face more than triple the reoperation risk. 2

  • Adjacent-level surgery rates are significantly reduced with arthroplasty (3.1% vs 20.5%, p=0.0005), demonstrating that motion preservation substantially protects neighboring segments from accelerated degeneration. 2

Adjacent Segment Protection

  • Radiographically significant adjacent-segment pathology progression at 10 years occurs in only 12.9% of arthroplasty patients compared to 39.3% of fusion patients (p=0.006), providing objective evidence that motion preservation reduces biomechanical stress on adjacent levels. 2

  • The concern that fusion contributes to accelerated adjacent segment degeneration was the primary driver for developing cervical disc replacement technology, and long-term data now validates this concern. 3

Patient Satisfaction and Functional Outcomes

  • Patient satisfaction is significantly higher with arthroplasty, with 98.7% reporting "very satisfied" at 10 years versus 88.9% with ACDF (p=0.05). 2

  • Patient-reported outcomes and change from baseline are generally better in arthroplasty patients across multiple validated measures including Neck Disability Index, neck and arm pain scores, and SF-12. 2

  • For single-level disease specifically, arthroplasty demonstrates superior neurological success (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.47-2.49; p<0.00001), better range of motion preservation (MD 6.67°; 95% CI 4.82-8.53; p<0.00001), and reduced secondary surgical procedures (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.37-0.68; p<0.00001) at 24 months. 4

Guideline-Based Patient Selection Criteria

Mandatory Prerequisites Before Surgery

  • Complete a minimum 6-week trial of structured conservative therapy including formal physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, activity modification, and possible cervical collar immobilization, unless progressive neurological deficits are present. 1, 5, 6

  • Document that 75-90% of cervical radiculopathy patients improve with conservative management, making premature surgical intervention inappropriate. 1

  • Confirm clinical correlation between imaging findings (moderate-to-severe foraminal stenosis or disc herniation) and symptoms (dermatomal pain, sensory changes, motor weakness). 1, 5

Specific Contraindications to Arthroplasty

  • Obtain flexion-extension radiographs to definitively rule out segmental instability before proceeding with arthroplasty, as static MRI cannot adequately assess dynamic instability. 1

  • Exclude recent postoperative infection, which represents an absolute contraindication to artificial disc placement due to unacceptable risk of recurrent infection and implant failure. 1

  • Verify absence of adjacent level disease after recent fusion, as this is not FDA-approved for arthroplasty and lacks long-term outcome data. 1

  • Document bone density assessment to exclude osteoporosis, which compromises implant stability and fusion success rates. 1

  • Confirm intact facet joints without significant arthropathy, as facet degeneration is a contraindication to motion-preserving surgery. 1

Real-World Clinical Outcomes

Comparative Safety Profile

  • Registry data from the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative demonstrates similar complication rates and functional outcomes between ACDF and CDA at 2 years in real-world practice, confirming that arthroplasty safety matches fusion in routine clinical settings outside strict clinical trial protocols. 7

  • Length of stay is shorter with arthroplasty (1.0 vs 1.3 days, p<0.001), and the procedure is more frequently performed as outpatient surgery. 7

  • Adverse event rates are equivalent between arthroplasty and fusion (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.76-1.15; p=0.52), demonstrating comparable safety profiles. 4

Operative Considerations

  • Operation time is longer for arthroplasty (approximately 90 minutes longer for two-level procedures), but this difference is not clinically significant given the superior long-term outcomes. 8

  • Blood loss is comparable between procedures (MD 6.92 mL; 95% CI -3.09 to 16.92 mL; p=0.18). 4

Critical Decision Algorithm

When to Choose Arthroplasty (Preferred)

  1. Age <60 years with single-level disease, intact facet joints, no instability on flexion-extension films, normal bone density, and failed 6-week conservative trial. 1, 2, 7

  2. Patient prioritizes motion preservation and accepts slightly longer operative time in exchange for dramatically reduced adjacent segment disease and reoperation risk. 2

  3. No contraindications present (instability, infection history, osteoporosis, severe facet arthropathy, adjacent level disease). 1

When ACDF Remains Appropriate

  • Presence of any absolute contraindication to arthroplasty listed above. 1

  • Patient age >60-65 years where adjacent segment disease risk is less relevant due to shorter life expectancy. 3

  • Multilevel disease (>2 levels), though two-level arthroplasty shows similar outcomes to fusion. 8

  • Documented segmental instability on flexion-extension radiographs. 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never proceed to surgery without documenting 6 weeks of formal conservative therapy unless progressive neurological deficits are present, as 75-90% of patients improve without surgery. 1, 5

  • Never rely on static MRI alone to exclude instability; flexion-extension radiographs are mandatory before arthroplasty. 1

  • Never ignore the 3-fold higher reoperation rate with ACDF when counseling patients about long-term outcomes. 2

  • Never assume equivalent outcomes based on short-term data; the superiority of arthroplasty becomes increasingly apparent beyond 5 years. 2

  • Never perform arthroplasty in patients with osteoporosis or significant facet arthropathy, as these compromise implant stability and motion preservation benefits. 1

References

1
Guideline

Cervical Radiculopathy Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

5
Guideline

Medical Necessity of Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

6
Guideline

Adjacent ACDF C3-4 Medical Necessity Criteria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

8
Research

Differences between arthroplasty and anterior cervical fusion in two-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2014

Related Questions

What are the implications of 2-level cervical disc arthroplasty on a pilot operating an ejection seat?
Is ibuprofen (Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug) safe for pain management after anterior cervical discectomy and arthroplasty?
Is cervical spine fusion the same as cervical disc replacement (Cervical Disc Arthroplasty)?
Is a cervical artificial discectomy (CERV ARTIFIC DISKECTOMY) medically necessary for a patient with chronic cervicothoracic neck pain, given the uncertainty of radiologic segmental instability and the use of a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved prosthetic?
Is C6-7 anterior cervical discectomy and arthroplasty medically necessary for a patient with a right paracentral disc herniation at C6-7 and persistent neck and radiating right arm symptoms despite conservative management?
What is delta bilirubin and what is its clinical significance?
How should I manage an acute asthma exacerbation in a patient with a modestly elevated troponin I (0.79 ng/mL) but no chest pain?
Can pregnenolone be metabolized to estrogen in adults, particularly post‑menopausal women, obese patients, or individuals taking aromatase‑inducing drugs?
What high‑quality evidence supports using adjuvant abiraterone acetate plus prednisone after definitive external‑beam radiotherapy with long‑term androgen‑deprivation therapy in men with locally advanced, high‑risk prostate cancer (clinical stage T3‑T4, Gleason 8‑10, PSA >20 ng/mL)?
In patients with bloody diarrhea, should antibiotics be avoided in afebrile individuals (suspected STEC/EHEC) compared to those who are febrile?
What are the next steps in evaluating and managing a 64‑year‑old woman with stage 3 chronic kidney disease, hypertension, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, severe left‑ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, active smoker, and mild hypercalcemia (total calcium 11.5 mg/dL, ionized calcium high‑normal, intact parathyroid hormone low‑normal, 25‑hydroxyvitamin D insufficient, phosphorus low‑normal)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Ask Question