In a patient with ST‑elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), should a drug‑coated balloon (DCB) be used instead of a drug‑eluting stent (DES)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 26, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Drug-Coated Balloon in STEMI

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) should NOT be used instead of drug-eluting stents (DES) in primary PCI for STEMI—current guidelines universally recommend stent implantation (preferably new-generation DES) as the standard of care, with no established role for DCB as a primary treatment strategy in this setting.

Guideline-Mandated Stent Strategy

The evidence is unequivocal across all major cardiology societies:

  • Stenting is mandatory over balloon angioplasty alone during primary PCI for STEMI (Class I, Level A recommendation) 1, 2.

  • New-generation DES are specifically recommended over bare-metal stents (BMS) for primary PCI in STEMI patients (Class I, Level A) 1, 2.

  • No guideline from ESC, ACC/AHA, or EACTS mentions drug-coated balloons as an acceptable alternative to stenting in the acute STEMI setting 1.

Why Stents Are Superior

The rationale for mandatory stenting is based on robust mortality and morbidity data:

  • Stenting reduces target vessel revascularization and reinfarction risk compared to balloon angioplasty alone, though mortality benefit is primarily seen with DES over BMS in long-term follow-up 1.

  • New-generation DES demonstrate superior safety profiles with lower rates of stent thrombosis (0.8% vs. 1.2% for BMS) and significantly reduced repeat revascularization (16.5% vs. 19.8%) 1.

  • Five-year follow-up data from the EXAMINATION trial showed mortality reduction with DES compared to BMS in AMI patients 1.

When to Choose BMS Over DES

The only scenario where BMS is preferred over DES (but stenting is still mandatory):

  • High bleeding risk patients who cannot tolerate prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) 1, 2.

  • Inability to comply with 12 months of DAPT due to financial, social, or medical barriers 1, 2.

  • Anticipated need for invasive or surgical procedures within the next year that would require DAPT interruption 1.

  • Independent indication for long-term anticoagulation where triple therapy would pose excessive bleeding risk 1.

Critical Antiplatelet Requirements

Regardless of stent type, DAPT is non-negotiable:

  • Aspirin 162-325 mg loading dose before primary PCI (Class I, Level B) 1, 2, 3.

  • P2Y12 inhibitor loading as early as possible: clopidogrel 600 mg, prasugrel 60 mg, or ticagrelor 180 mg (Class I, Level B) 1, 2, 3.

  • Minimum 12 months of uninterrupted DAPT after DES implantation (Class I, Level A/B) 1, 2, 4.

  • Premature DAPT discontinuation is the leading preventable cause of stent thrombosis, which carries mortality rates exceeding 40% 4.

Procedural Technical Standards

Additional evidence-based technical recommendations:

  • Radial access is preferred over femoral access when performed by experienced operators (Class I/IIa, Level A) 1, 3.

  • Routine thrombus aspiration is NOT recommended (Class III, Level A) 1, 3.

  • Routine deferred stenting is NOT recommended based on the DANAMI 3-DEFER trial showing no benefit and higher target vessel revascularization 1.

Common Pitfall to Avoid

Do not confuse DCB use in stable coronary disease (e.g., in-stent restenosis, small vessel disease) with its role in STEMI—the thrombotic, high-risk milieu of acute MI requires the mechanical scaffolding and sustained drug delivery that only stents provide 1. Drug-coated balloons lack the structural support to prevent acute vessel recoil and cannot address the massive thrombus burden characteristic of STEMI 5, 6, 7.

Quality of Life and Long-Term Outcomes

  • DES reduce the need for repeat revascularization procedures, which directly improves quality of life by avoiding recurrent angina and additional interventions 1, 5, 6, 7.

  • Lower stent thrombosis rates with new-generation DES translate to fewer catastrophic events and better long-term survival 1, 5.

  • The DEDICATION trial showed 5-year MACE rates favoring DES (16.9% vs. 23% for BMS), though cardiac mortality findings were mixed and likely related to first-generation DES 8, 9.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Stent Placement After STEMI

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Hypertensive Emergency with STEMI

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Acute Stent Thrombosis with Cardiogenic Shock – Evidence‑Based Recommendations

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.