Interpretation: Biological False-Positive RPR
This serologic pattern—reactive RPR at 1:1 titer with negative treponemal antibodies—represents a biological false-positive (BFP) result and does NOT indicate syphilis infection. No treatment for syphilis is warranted. 1
Diagnostic Algorithm
Why This is NOT Syphilis
- Both nontreponemal (RPR) AND treponemal tests must be reactive to diagnose syphilis—a single positive test type is insufficient for diagnosis. 1
- When the RPR is reactive but the treponemal test (FTA-ABS, TP-PA, or treponemal EIA) is negative, this definitively indicates a biological false-positive RPR result, not syphilis. 1
- The 1:1 titer represents the lowest dilution tested and is at the threshold where false-positives are most common—studies show 27-31% of RPR results with titers <1:8 are biological false-positives. 2
Prevalence and Risk Factors for False-Positive RPR
Biological false-positive RPR results occur in specific populations and conditions:
- General population baseline: 0.6-1.3% false-positive rate 2
- HIV infection: 10.7% false-positive rate (10-fold higher than general population) 2
- Hepatitis C infection: 4.5% false-positive rate 2, 3
- Hepatitis B infection: 8.3% false-positive rate 2
- Pregnancy: 0.6% false-positive rate 2
- Age >60 years: increased false-positive rate (0.34% vs 0.25% in younger patients) 2
- Autoimmune diseases: particularly systemic lupus erythematosus and connective tissue diseases 2
- Intravenous drug use: associated with increased false-positive rates 2
Management Recommendations
Immediate Actions
- No syphilis treatment is indicated because the diagnosis requires both reactive nontreponemal AND treponemal tests. 1
- Investigate underlying causes of the false-positive RPR by screening for:
When to Consider Repeat Testing
Repeat syphilis serology in 2-4 weeks ONLY if:
- High clinical suspicion exists based on documented sexual exposure to a partner with confirmed syphilis AND the patient has clinical signs suggestive of primary syphilis (genital ulcer/chancre). 1
- RPR titer is ≥1:8 (not 1:1 as in this case) AND there is documented high-risk sexual exposure within the past 4 weeks. 1
- Alternative treponemal testing with a different assay method (e.g., syphilis line immunoassay/INNO-LIA) may be considered if clinical suspicion remains very high despite negative initial treponemal test. 1
Critical Exceptions Requiring Direct Detection
If a primary chancre or ulcer is present despite negative serology, consider:
- Darkfield microscopy of lesion exudate 1
- Direct fluorescent antibody testing of lesion material 1
- PCR testing for Treponema pallidum DNA from ulcer swabs 1
These direct detection methods are valuable in the first 1-3 weeks of infection when antibodies may not yet be detectable. 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not treat based on RPR alone—the negative treponemal test definitively excludes syphilis in this case. 1
- Do not assume this represents early infection—treponemal antibodies appear 1-4 weeks after infection and would be positive by the time RPR becomes reactive in >99% of cases. 1, 4
- Do not repeat testing without clear clinical indication—unnecessary repeat testing in low-risk patients leads to additional false-positives and patient anxiety. 1
- Do not confuse this with the "prozone phenomenon"—prozone reactions occur with extremely high antibody titers in secondary syphilis (causing false-negative RPR), not with low 1:1 titers. 2
Special Population Considerations
- HIV-infected patients may rarely have atypical serologic responses, but standard tests remain accurate for >95% of HIV-positive individuals—a negative treponemal test still reliably excludes syphilis. 1, 5
- Pregnant patients with false-positive RPR should have the underlying cause investigated, but do not require syphilis treatment when treponemal tests are negative. 2