What is the likelihood of deep‑vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) with a D‑dimer level of 1.32 µg/mL fibrinogen‑equivalent units (FEU)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 26, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Likelihood of DVT or PE with D-Dimer 1.32 µg/mL FEU

A D-dimer of 1.32 µg/mL FEU (1320 ng/mL) is moderately elevated and cannot diagnose or exclude DVT or PE on its own—you must immediately assess clinical probability using a validated score (Wells or Geneva), then proceed to imaging if probability is moderate-to-high, or use the D-dimer to rule out disease only if probability is low. 1

Critical First Step: Clinical Probability Assessment

  • Never interpret D-dimer without first calculating a validated clinical probability score—this is the most common and dangerous pitfall in VTE diagnosis. 1
  • Use the Wells score for DVT (assigns points for localized tenderness, leg swelling, pitting edema, collateral veins, previous DVT, active cancer, paralysis/immobilization, and alternative diagnosis) or the revised Geneva score for PE (assigns points for previous VTE, heart rate >75 bpm, surgery/fracture within 1 month, hemoptysis, active cancer, unilateral leg pain, and pain on palpation). 1

Risk-Stratified Management Algorithm

Low Clinical Probability (≤10% pretest probability)

  • Your D-dimer of 1320 ng/mL is positive (above the standard 500 ng/mL cutoff), so you cannot rule out VTE. 1
  • Proceed immediately to imaging: proximal compression ultrasound or whole-leg ultrasound for suspected DVT; CT pulmonary angiography for suspected PE. 1
  • A negative highly sensitive D-dimer in this group would have safely excluded VTE with 99–100% negative predictive value and <1% 3-month thromboembolic risk, but your elevated result mandates imaging. 1, 2

Moderate Clinical Probability (~25% pretest probability)

  • Skip D-dimer interpretation entirely and proceed directly to imaging—whole-leg ultrasound for DVT or CT pulmonary angiography for PE. 1
  • D-dimer adds minimal diagnostic value in this risk stratum. 1

High Clinical Probability (≥40–50% pretest probability)

  • Proceed immediately to definitive imaging without considering the D-dimer result—proximal compression ultrasound or whole-leg ultrasound for DVT; CT pulmonary angiography for PE. 1
  • A normal D-dimer does not safely exclude VTE in high-probability patients. 1

Age-Adjusted Interpretation (If Patient >50 Years)

  • For patients older than 50 years, use the age-adjusted cutoff: age × 10 ng/mL (e.g., 700 ng/mL for a 70-year-old). 1
  • This adjustment maintains >97% sensitivity while improving specificity from ~35% to ~46%, increasing the proportion of elderly patients in whom VTE can be safely excluded from 6% to 30%. 1
  • Your D-dimer of 1320 ng/mL would exceed the age-adjusted threshold for anyone under 132 years old, so it remains positive regardless of age. 1

Quantitative Risk Stratification Based on D-Dimer Magnitude

  • D-dimer levels between 500–1000 ng/mL carry baseline PE prevalence; levels 1000–2000 ng/mL double the risk; levels 2000–4000 ng/mL increase risk fourfold; and levels >4000 ng/mL carry very high PE prevalence independent of clinical score. 3
  • Your level of 1320 ng/mL falls in the intermediate elevation range, where PE prevalence is approximately double that of minimally elevated D-dimer. 3
  • Patients with D-dimer >2000 ng/mL and an "unlikely" clinical probability score had a 36% PE prevalence—comparable to the "likely" clinical probability group—demonstrating that markedly elevated D-dimer can override low clinical probability. 3

Populations Where D-Dimer Has Severely Limited Utility

  • Do not rely on D-dimer in hospitalized patients, post-surgical patients, cancer patients, pregnant women, patients with active infection/sepsis, or trauma patients—specificity drops to ~10% in these groups, and the number needed to test to exclude one PE rises from 3 to >10. 1, 4, 5, 6
  • In trauma patients within the first 4 days post-injury, tissue injury elevates D-dimer independently of thrombosis, yielding a 24% false-negative rate and 76% sensitivity for DVT—proceed directly to imaging regardless of D-dimer. 5, 6
  • In cancer patients, active malignancy is worth 2 points on the Wells score, automatically placing most into at least moderate clinical probability; proceed directly to imaging rather than interpreting D-dimer. 4

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never diagnose VTE based solely on a positive D-dimer—imaging confirmation is mandatory before initiating anticoagulation. 1
  • Never order D-dimer in high clinical probability patients—it wastes time and resources while delaying definitive imaging. 1
  • Never use D-dimer as a screening test in hospitalized patients—the false-positive rate is unacceptably high (specificity ~10%). 1
  • Never perform additional testing after a negative proximal or whole-leg ultrasound in low-risk populations—this leads to unnecessary procedures. 1

Prognostic Significance

  • D-dimer levels 3–4 times above normal (>1500–2000 ng/mL) warrant hospital admission consideration even without severe symptoms, as this signifies substantial thrombin generation and increased mortality risk. 1
  • Your level of 1320 ng/mL approaches but does not exceed this threshold, so admission decisions should be based primarily on clinical presentation and imaging findings rather than D-dimer alone. 1

References

Guideline

D-Dimer Testing in Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Elevated D-dimer in Patients with Pneumonia or Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Effect of tissue injury on D-Dimer levels: a prospective study in trauma patients.

Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2002

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.