What is the optimal management for an 85‑year‑old woman with ER (estrogen receptor)‑positive, PR (progesterone receptor)‑positive, HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)‑positive breast adenocarcinoma presenting with an isolated sternal mass?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 26, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of 85-Year-Old with Triple-Positive Breast Adenocarcinoma Presenting as Isolated Sternal Mass

For an 85-year-old woman with ER+/PR+/HER2+ breast cancer presenting with an isolated sternal mass, initiate systemic therapy with endocrine therapy plus HER2-targeted therapy (trastuzumab plus pertuzumab), reserving chemotherapy only if rapid disease control is needed, followed by consideration of local ablative treatment to the sternal lesion if she achieves good systemic response. 1, 2, 3

Initial Diagnostic Workup

Before initiating treatment, complete staging is mandatory to confirm this is truly isolated disease 1:

  • Full staging workup including complete history, physical examination, laboratory tests (complete blood count, liver and renal function, alkaline phosphatase, calcium), and imaging of chest and abdomen (preferably CT) and bone scan 1
  • Brain MRI to exclude asymptomatic CNS metastases, particularly important in HER2+ disease 1
  • PET-CT is valuable here to confirm the sternal mass is the only site of disease and exclude other occult metastases 1
  • Biopsy of the sternal mass to confirm metastatic disease and reassess ER/PR/HER2 status, as receptor status can change from primary to metastatic sites 1
  • Cardiac assessment (echocardiogram or MUGA scan) to establish baseline left ventricular ejection fraction before HER2-targeted therapy 3

Systemic Treatment Strategy

Primary Recommendation: Endocrine Therapy Plus Dual HER2 Blockade

The optimal first-line approach for this 85-year-old patient is endocrine therapy combined with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, avoiding chemotherapy initially. 1

Here's the rationale:

  • Age and performance status should not be the sole reason to withhold effective therapy, but should guide treatment intensity 1
  • For HR+/HER2+ disease, the choice between chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy depends on tumor grade, biomarker expression, performance status, comorbidities, and need for rapid disease control 1
  • An isolated sternal metastasis without visceral crisis does not require immediate chemotherapy 1
  • Dual HER2 blockade (trastuzumab plus pertuzumab) combined with an aromatase inhibitor has demonstrated efficacy in HR+/HER2+ metastatic disease with median PFS of 11.0 months versus 5.6 months with single HER2 blockade 4

Specific Regimen

  • Trastuzumab: Loading dose 8 mg/kg IV, then maintenance 6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks 4
  • Pertuzumab: Standard dosing per protocol 2, 3
  • Aromatase inhibitor: Letrozole 2.5 mg daily, anastrozole 1 mg daily, or exemestane 25 mg daily 4
  • Continue HER2-targeted therapy indefinitely until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity 2, 3

When to Add Chemotherapy

Consider adding a taxane to the HER2-targeted therapy if 1, 2, 3:

  • Rapid clinical progression occurs on endocrine therapy plus HER2 blockade
  • Life-threatening visceral metastases develop
  • Need for rapid symptom or disease control emerges
  • If chemotherapy is added, continue for approximately 4-6 months or until maximal response, while maintaining HER2-targeted therapy 2, 3

Local Treatment Considerations

Oligometastatic Approach

This patient with an isolated sternal metastasis is a candidate for aggressive local therapy after achieving systemic disease control. 1

  • A multimodal approach including locoregional treatments with curative intent should be considered for patients with oligometastatic disease that is highly sensitive to systemic therapy 1
  • Patients with single-site metastatic disease can achieve long-term survival with combined systemic and local ablative treatment 1
  • Local treatment options include surgical resection or radiotherapy to the sternal lesion, performed after demonstrating response to systemic therapy 1
  • This approach is supported by data showing favorable survival in selected patients undergoing radical local therapy for limited metastatic disease, though based on retrospective series 1

Timing of Local Therapy

  • Initiate systemic therapy first 1
  • Reassess with imaging after 2-4 months of systemic therapy 1
  • If excellent response achieved, consider definitive local treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) to the sternal lesion 1

Monitoring and Supportive Care

Treatment Monitoring

  • Evaluate response every 2-4 months with imaging of target lesions 1
  • Monitor cardiac function regularly during trastuzumab therapy; discontinue if clinically significant decrease in LVEF occurs 3
  • Tumor markers (CA 15-3, CA 27.29) may assist in evaluating response, particularly if the sternal lesion becomes non-measurable after treatment 1

Supportive Care Priorities

  • Early introduction of expert palliative care for effective control of pain and bone-related symptoms from the sternal metastasis 1
  • Supportive care allowing safer and more tolerable delivery of appropriate treatments should always be part of the treatment plan 1
  • Bone-directed therapy (bisphosphonates or denosumab) should be considered for skeletal metastasis 1

Critical Prognostic Considerations

Favorable Features in This Case

  • ER+/PR+/HER2+ subtype has better survival than ER-/PR-/HER2+ disease, with 8-year survival rates reaching 37% with optimal dual HER2 blockade 5, 6
  • Isolated bone metastasis (sternal) has more favorable prognosis than visceral or multiple metastatic sites 6
  • HR-positive status is a favorable prognostic feature in HER2+ metastatic disease 5

Expected Outcomes

  • Median overall survival of approximately 57 months can be expected with optimal first-line trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and endocrine therapy 5
  • Approximately 26% of patients become long-term responders with modern HER2-targeted therapy 5
  • The ER+/PR+/HER2+ group shows significantly better disease-free survival and breast cancer-specific survival than ER+/PR-/HER2+ patients 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay HER2-targeted therapy: Postponing trastuzumab may eliminate the survival advantages demonstrated in pivotal trials 5
  • Do not discontinue HER2-targeted therapy when stopping chemotherapy: This compromises outcomes; HER2 blockade must continue until progression 3
  • Do not use lapatinib as first-line therapy: Lapatinib-based regimens are less effective than trastuzumab-based regimens in HER2+ metastatic disease 4
  • Do not perform "palliative" surgery to the sternal lesion initially: Systemic therapy should be the first treatment; local therapy is considered only after demonstrating systemic response 1
  • Do not assume age alone precludes aggressive therapy: The 85-year-old age should not be the sole reason to withhold effective HER2-targeted therapy and endocrine therapy, which are generally well-tolerated 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of ER-Negative, PR-Negative, HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of ER-Negative, PR-Negative, HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Survival Rate for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

What is the stage of a postmenopausal woman's ER+/PR+/HER2+ breast cancer, given that she has undergone a Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM)?
What is the best treatment for breast cancer (Ca mammae) with low Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) expression, positive Estrogen Receptor (ER) status, and positive Progesterone Receptor (PR) status?
What are the treatment options for a patient with invasive carcinoma of the breast, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, progesterone receptor (PgR) negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative, with lymph node involvement?
What is the recommended treatment for a patient with estrogen receptor (ER) negative, progesterone receptor (PR) negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer?
Is triple positive breast cancer associated with a poorer prognosis?
What is the dosing regimen, monitoring schedule, and safety precautions for Renvela (lanreotide acetate) in adult dialysis patients with persistent hyperphosphatemia despite dietary restriction and conventional phosphate binders?
In a man who has undergone radical prostatectomy and now has biochemical recurrence, which high‑risk features—post‑operative prostate‑specific antigen ≥0.2 ng/mL confirmed on two measurements, PSA doubling time ≤6 months, Gleason grade group ≥4 (Gleason score ≥8), positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension or seminal‑vesicle invasion, estimated life expectancy ≥10 years, and ability to tolerate hormonal therapy—indicate that a 24‑month androgen‑deprivation therapy should be administered together with salvage external‑beam radiotherapy?
How is septic arthritis diagnosed?
What is Renvela (lanthanum carbonate) used for?
In a male patient with a mobile subareolar mass under the left nipple present for about a year, now enlarging and without nipple discharge, what is the appropriate diagnostic and management approach?
In an adult male with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 15 ng/mL, what is the next diagnostic test?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.