Is CAR‑T cell therapy approved for second‑line treatment of diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 26, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CAR-T Cell Therapy Approval Status for Second-Line DLBCL

Yes, CAR-T cell therapy is now FDA-approved for second-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients who are refractory to first-line chemoimmunotherapy or who relapse within 12 months of first-line treatment. 1

Current FDA-Approved Indications for DLBCL

The FDA has approved CAR-T therapy (lisocabtagene maraleucel/BREYANZI) for adult patients with large B-cell lymphoma including DLBCL in three distinct clinical scenarios 1:

  • Second-line setting (early relapse/refractory): Patients with refractory disease to first-line chemoimmunotherapy OR relapse within 12 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy 1

  • Second-line setting (transplant-ineligible): Patients with refractory disease to first-line chemoimmunotherapy OR relapse after first-line chemoimmunotherapy who are not eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation due to comorbidities or age 1

  • Third-line and beyond: Patients with relapsed or refractory disease after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy 1

Evolution from Third-Line to Second-Line Approval

This represents a significant shift from the original 2019 approval landscape. Historical NCCN guidelines from 2019 restricted CAR-T therapy to patients who had received ≥2 prior chemoimmunotherapy regimens 2, effectively making it a third-line or later option. The current FDA approval now explicitly includes second-line use for specific high-risk populations 1.

Clinical Evidence Supporting Second-Line Use

The European Society for Medical Oncology recognizes that CAR-T therapy demonstrates superior outcomes compared to the traditional autologous stem cell transplantation pathway in early relapsed disease 3. For patients who relapse within 12 months of rituximab-containing first-line therapy, the traditional ASCT pathway yields only 23% three-year progression-free survival 3. CAR-T is now considered equivalent or superior to ASCT based on recent evidence 3.

Key Eligibility Criteria

Patients being considered for second-line CAR-T therapy must meet specific organ function requirements 3:

  • Creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min 3
  • Cardiac ejection fraction ≥45% 3

Critical Clinical Decision Point

Do not proceed directly to autologous stem cell transplantation without first considering CAR-T therapy in patients with early relapsed or refractory DLBCL, as the evidence now favors CAR-T in this population 3. The traditional salvage chemotherapy followed by ASCT pathway should be reserved for patients who do not meet criteria for second-line CAR-T or who are not candidates for cellular therapy 3.

Important Limitation

CAR-T therapy is not indicated for primary central nervous system lymphoma 1. This is a critical exclusion, as primary CNS DLBCL requires fundamentally different treatment approaches with high-dose methotrexate-based regimens 4.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Recurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Current Management of Primary CNS Lymphoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.