What does it mean when a pacemaker fails to capture in an adult patient with a history of bradyarrhythmia (e.g., sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 26, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pacemaker Failure to Capture

Loss of capture means the pacemaker delivers an electrical impulse (visible as a pacing spike on ECG) but fails to depolarize the myocardium, resulting in no subsequent P wave or QRS complex—this represents a potentially life-threatening malfunction that requires immediate evaluation and intervention. 1

Definition and Clinical Significance

Failure to capture occurs when the pacemaker's electrical stimulus is insufficient to depolarize cardiac tissue, leaving the patient without the intended pacing support. 2 This malfunction can occur anywhere within the pacing system—from the pulse generator through the leads to the electrode-myocardium interface. 1

The clinical consequences depend entirely on the patient's underlying rhythm:

  • Pacemaker-dependent patients (those with complete heart block or no escape rhythm) face immediate hemodynamic collapse and potential cardiac arrest when capture fails. 2
  • Non-dependent patients may tolerate intermittent loss of capture if their intrinsic rhythm provides adequate cardiac output. 2

Causes of Loss of Capture

Acute Causes (Within Days to Weeks of Implantation)

The most common acute cause immediately after implantation is lead dislodgement or malposition. 2 This typically occurs within the first few weeks as the lead has not yet fibrosed into place. 2

Other acute causes include:

  • Myocardial perforation with the lead tip no longer in contact with viable myocardium. 2
  • Inadequate initial lead positioning during the implantation procedure. 2

Chronic Causes (Months to Years After Implantation)

An increase in capture threshold over time is the predominant chronic mechanism, requiring higher energy output than the pacemaker is programmed to deliver. 2 This threshold elevation results from:

  • Fibrosis at the electrode-myocardium interface, which increases impedance and reduces effective current delivery. 2
  • Lead fracture or insulation break, preventing adequate current transmission to the myocardium. 2
  • Exit block, where local tissue changes prevent electrical propagation despite adequate lead function. 2
  • Progressive cardiomyopathy with reduced myocardial excitability. 2

Metabolic and Pharmacologic Causes

Several reversible factors can acutely elevate capture thresholds: 2

  • Severe hyperkalemia (>6.5-7.0 mEq/L) increases threshold dramatically. 2
  • Severe acidemia impairs myocardial responsiveness. 2
  • Class I antiarrhythmic drugs (flecainide, propafenone) increase capture thresholds. 2
  • Severe hypothyroidism can elevate thresholds. 2

Technical and Programming Issues

  • Inappropriately low output settings programmed below the patient's actual capture threshold. 2
  • Battery depletion resulting in insufficient voltage delivery (though modern devices typically alert before complete failure). 2
  • External electromagnetic interference from sources like MRI or electrocautery. 2

Diagnostic Approach on ECG

On ECG, loss of capture appears as pacing spikes without subsequent atrial (P wave) or ventricular (QRS complex) depolarization. 1 The key is distinguishing this from normal function:

  • Pacing spike present + no P wave or QRS = loss of capture. 1
  • No pacing spike + no P wave or QRS = failure to pace (undersensing or failure to output). 1
  • Pacing spike + appropriate P wave or QRS = normal capture. 1

Immediate Management Priorities

For pacemaker-dependent patients with symptomatic bradycardia or hemodynamic instability, immediate transcutaneous pacing or temporary transvenous pacing is required while the underlying cause is identified. 2 This is a medical emergency requiring urgent intervention. 1

For stable patients:

  • Interrogate the device immediately to assess programmed output, measured impedance, and capture thresholds. 2
  • Obtain chest X-ray to evaluate for lead dislodgement, fracture, or perforation. 2
  • Check electrolytes (potassium, magnesium, calcium) and correct abnormalities. 2
  • Review medications for drugs that increase capture threshold. 2
  • Assess metabolic status including thyroid function and acid-base balance. 2

Definitive Management

If capture threshold has increased but the lead is intact and well-positioned, reprogram the pacemaker to higher output (typically 2-3 times the measured threshold as a safety margin). 2 The ACC/AHA guidelines reference capture thresholds as a critical parameter requiring monitoring. 3

Lead revision or replacement is required for: 2

  • Confirmed lead dislodgement or fracture on imaging. 2
  • Persistently elevated thresholds that cannot be managed with programming adjustments (typically >5V at 0.5ms). 2
  • Myocardial perforation requiring lead repositioning. 2

Critical Pitfalls

  • Never assume loss of capture is benign—always assess the patient's pacemaker dependency and hemodynamic status first. 1, 2
  • Reversible causes must be excluded before attributing loss of capture to device malfunction requiring invasive intervention. 2
  • In patients with neuromuscular diseases (myotonic dystrophy, Kearns-Sayre syndrome), even minor pacing abnormalities warrant aggressive evaluation given unpredictable progression of conduction disease. 4
  • Battery depletion typically provides warning through elective replacement indicators; sudden complete loss of capture from battery failure is rare with modern devices. 2

References

Research

Causes of Failure to Capture in Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators.

The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management, 2020

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Indications for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Symptomatic Bradyarrhythmias

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.