Management of Swollen/Rectal Prolapse
Immediately assess for signs of strangulation (gangrene, necrosis, perforation, or hemodynamic instability), as these require emergency surgical intervention without delay. 1
Initial Assessment and Risk Stratification
Clinical Examination Priorities
- Distinguish between complicated and uncomplicated prolapse by examining for signs of strangulation: gangrenous or necrotic tissue on the prolapsed segment, irreducibility despite manual attempts, ulceration, or perforation 1
- Check vital signs for hemodynamic instability (hypotension, tachycardia, shock), which signals advanced tissue necrosis requiring immediate surgery 1
- Assess for peritoneal signs (abdominal rigidity, rebound tenderness, guarding) indicating perforation of strangulated bowel 1
- Differentiate true rectal prolapse (concentric, full-thickness protrusion) from prolapsed hemorrhoids (radial bulging of discrete anal cushions) 2
Laboratory Investigations
- Order complete blood count, serum creatinine, and inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, lactate) to assess patient status 2
- Elevated lactate reflects poor tissue perfusion and bowel ischemia, serving as a key marker of severe sepsis 1
- Elevated procalcitonin correlates with extent of intestinal necrotic damage and increased mortality risk 1
- Leukocytosis commonly indicates transmural bowel necrosis (except in immunocompromised patients) 1
Management Algorithm
STEP 1: Emergency Surgical Indications (Immediate Operating Room)
If ANY of the following are present, proceed directly to emergency surgery—do not delay for imaging or conservative measures:
- Signs of shock, gangrene, or perforation of prolapsed bowel 2, 1
- Hemodynamic instability 2, 1
- Peritoneal signs indicating perforation 1
- Use abdominal open approach for unstable patients 2, 1
STEP 2: Attempted Manual Reduction (Stable Patients Without Strangulation)
For irreducible prolapse without signs of ischemia in hemodynamically stable patients:
- Position patient in Trendelenburg with intravenous sedation and analgesia 2
- Apply topical granulated sugar to create hyperosmolar environment that reduces edema—this is the most accessible technique 2
- Alternative methods include: hypertonic solutions (50% dextrose or 70% mannitol), elastic compression wrap, or submucosal hyaluronidase injection 2, 3
- Critical caveat: The failure rate of non-operative management is high 2—do not persist beyond one reasonable attempt, as delay risks progression to strangulation
STEP 3: Surgical Planning for Stable Patients After Failed Reduction
For hemodynamically stable patients with complicated prolapse requiring surgery:
Base decision between abdominal versus perineal approach on:
For abdominal approach, choose between open versus laparoscopic based on:
Perineal procedures (e.g., Altemeier's procedure) can be utilized in emergency circumstances and may be safer for high-risk patients 4
STEP 4: Resection Decisions
- Base decision between primary anastomosis (with or without diverting ostomy) versus terminal colostomy on:
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never delay surgery in unstable patients to attempt conservative management—this is explicitly contraindicated 2, 1
- Do not perform imaging in hemodynamically unstable patients; rapid operative management takes absolute precedence 1
- Non-operative management is contraindicated when strangulation with gangrene or perforation is evident 2, 1
- Do not persist with multiple reduction attempts if initial effort fails—high failure rates mean you risk allowing progression to irreversible ischemia 2
- Pain is uncommon in uncomplicated prolapse; its presence suggests incarceration or strangulation requiring urgent intervention 5