What is the absorption time of Vicryl (Polyglactin 910) versus Vicryl Rapide (Polyglactin 910)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

Vicryl (polyglactin 910) typically takes 56-70 days (8-10 weeks) to completely absorb in the body, while Vicryl Rapide absorbs much faster, usually within 42 days (6 weeks). The key difference is that Vicryl Rapide is designed for faster absorption through a process called irradiation, which weakens the polymer chains.

Key Differences

  • Vicryl maintains approximately 65% of its tensile strength at 2 weeks and 40% at 3 weeks, providing longer support for wounds that need extended healing time.
  • In contrast, Vicryl Rapide loses 50% of its strength within 5 days and has essentially no tensile strength by 10-14 days, making it ideal for superficial skin closures, especially in children or facial wounds where suture removal might be difficult.

Clinical Implications

  • The faster absorption of Vicryl Rapide eliminates the need for suture removal in many cases, while standard Vicryl is better suited for tissues requiring longer support during healing.
  • Both are made of the same base material but differ in their manufacturing process and resulting absorption timeline, as noted in studies such as 1 which compared poliglecaprone-25 and polyglactin-910 in cutaneous surgery.

Evidence Summary

  • A study from 2 found that Vicryl was absorbed within six weeks, highlighting its suitability for certain surgical applications.
  • Another study from 3 compared nylon and polyglactin 910 for closing punch biopsy sites, finding no significant difference between the two materials, further supporting the use of Vicryl in various surgical contexts.
  • The most recent and relevant study 1 supports the notion that Vicryl and its rapid form have distinct absorption rates, influencing their application in surgery.

References

Research

Comparison of poliglecaprone-25 and polyglactin-910 in cutaneous surgery.

Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.], 2013

Research

Performance comparison of nylon and an absorbable suture material (Polyglactin 910) in the closure of punch biopsy sites.

Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.], 2000

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.