Likelihood of Positive Throat Culture After Negative Rapid Strep Test in Adults
In adults, a negative rapid antigen detection test (RADT) is sufficient to rule out streptococcal pharyngitis, and a backup throat culture is not necessary—the likelihood of a positive culture after a negative RADT is extremely low and clinically insignificant. 1
Test Performance in Adults
The RADT has a specificity of ≥95% in adults, making false-positive results rare. 1 The sensitivity ranges from 80-90%, meaning the test misses approximately 10-20% of true infections. 1 However, this modest false-negative rate is acceptable in adults for several critical reasons:
- Adults have only a 5-10% prevalence of group A streptococcal pharyngitis, compared to 20-30% in children aged 5-15 years. 1
- The risk of acute rheumatic fever in adults is virtually zero, eliminating the primary justification for aggressive case-finding. 1
- The extremely low pre-test probability combined with high test specificity means that a negative RADT reliably excludes streptococcal infection. 1
Why Backup Cultures Are Not Recommended in Adults
Multiple major guidelines explicitly state that confirmation of a negative RADT with throat culture is generally not necessary in adults due to the lower incidence of streptococcal infection and extremely low risk of acute rheumatic fever. 1 This recommendation is supported by:
- The Infectious Diseases Society of America, which states that a negative RADT alone is sufficient to rule out group A streptococcal pharyngitis in adults. 1
- The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, which recommends against routine throat culture after a negative RADT in adults. 1
- The American College of Physicians, which recommends that antibiotics should not be prescribed when the rapid strep test is negative in adults. 1
Quantifying the Likelihood
Research data provides specific numbers on false-negative rates:
- One emergency department study found that among adults with negative RADTs, 90.9% had negative throat cultures (negative predictive value), meaning only 9.1% had positive cultures. 2
- Another study examining 8,234 negative RADTs followed by throat cultures found that only 2.4% were culture-positive, with the rate dropping to 1.4% when using more recent test kits. 3
- A study stratifying by clinical features found that RADT sensitivity varied from 61% in low-probability patients to 97% in high-probability patients, suggesting that the false-negative rate is lowest precisely when clinical suspicion is highest. 4
Clinical Algorithm for Adults
When RADT is negative in an adult:
- Withhold all antibiotics entirely—the infection is overwhelmingly viral and self-limited. 1
- Do not order a backup throat culture—it provides no clinical benefit and wastes resources. 1
- Provide symptomatic therapy only: ibuprofen or acetaminophen for pain and fever relief. 1
- Reassure the patient that symptoms typically resolve in less than 1 week without antibiotics. 1
Critical Distinction: Children vs. Adults
In children and adolescents, the recommendation is completely different:
- A negative RADT must be confirmed with a throat culture because the sensitivity is only 80-90% and the prevalence of streptococcal infection is 20-30%. 1
- The higher risk of acute rheumatic fever in children justifies the two-step testing approach. 1
- Treatment within 9 days of symptom onset still effectively prevents acute rheumatic fever, so waiting for culture results is safe. 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not order backup cultures in adults based on "high clinical suspicion"—even with classic features like tonsillar exudates, a negative RADT is sufficient because these findings occur in both viral and bacterial infections. 1
- Do not confuse pediatric and adult guidelines—the two-step approach (RADT followed by culture if negative) applies only to children and adolescents, not adults. 1
- Do not test or treat asymptomatic household contacts—up to one-third may be asymptomatic carriers, and prophylactic treatment does not reduce subsequent infection rates. 1
Special Circumstances
The only scenario where clinical judgment might favor additional testing in adults is in patients at elevated risk for rheumatic fever (e.g., prior rheumatic fever history or residence in streptococcal-endemic areas), but even in these cases, antibiotics are generally withheld when streptococcal testing is negative. 1