Alteplase vs Heparin in Pulmonary Embolism
Alteplase should be used instead of heparin alone in high-risk (massive) pulmonary embolism presenting with sustained hypotension, shock, or cardiac arrest, where it is the first-line treatment with a Class I, Level A recommendation. 1
Risk Stratification Determines Treatment Choice
The decision between alteplase and heparin hinges entirely on hemodynamic status and PE severity:
High-Risk (Massive) PE: Alteplase is Mandatory
Use alteplase 100 mg IV over 2 hours when any of the following are present: 2, 1
- Sustained hypotension (systolic BP <90 mmHg for ≥15 minutes)
- Cardiogenic shock requiring vasopressor support
- Pulselessness or cardiac arrest
- Persistent profound bradycardia (HR <40 bpm) with signs of shock
The mortality benefit is unequivocal in this population—untreated massive PE carries a 52.4% 90-day mortality compared to 8.1% in hemodynamically stable patients. 1, 3 Thrombolysis reduces death or recurrence significantly in high-risk PE. 2
For cardiac arrest or imminent arrest, give alteplase 50 mg as an immediate IV bolus over 2-15 minutes and continue CPR for at least 30 minutes to allow the drug to work. 1 Do not use the 100 mg infusion protocol during active arrest. 1
Intermediate-Risk (Submassive) PE: Heparin is Standard, Alteplase is Controversial
Use heparin alone (unfractionated or LMWH) as first-line treatment for hemodynamically stable patients, even if they have right ventricular dysfunction or elevated cardiac biomarkers. 2 Routine thrombolysis is not recommended in non-high-risk PE. 2
However, the evidence shows nuance: A randomized trial of 256 intermediate-risk patients found that alteplase plus heparin reduced the combined endpoint of death or clinical deterioration (10.2% vs 24.6%, P=0.004) compared to heparin alone, though mortality itself was not significantly different (3.4% vs 2.2%). 4 The benefit was driven by reduced need for rescue thrombolysis. 2, 4
Consider alteplase in carefully selected intermediate-risk patients who have both RV dysfunction on echo AND elevated cardiac biomarkers, particularly if they lack elevated bleeding risk. 2 The ESC notes that the risk/benefit ratio may be favorable in this subset, though a large European trial is ongoing to resolve this controversy. 2
Low-Risk PE: Heparin Only
Use LMWH or fondaparinux as the recommended initial treatment for hemodynamically stable patients without RV dysfunction. 2 Alteplase has no role here.
Critical Contraindication Considerations
In life-threatening massive PE, most traditional contraindications to thrombolysis should be overridden given the 52-65% mortality without treatment. 1 However, absolute contraindications still apply: 1
- Prior intracranial hemorrhage
- Known structural cerebral vascular lesion
- Known malignant intracranial neoplasm
- Acute ischemic stroke within 6 months
When absolute contraindications exist, proceed immediately to surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed therapy rather than withholding reperfusion entirely. 2, 1
Anticoagulation Management Around Thrombolysis
Withhold heparin during the 2-hour alteplase infusion, then resume unfractionated heparin 3 hours after completion using weight-adjusted dosing (80 IU/kg bolus, then 18 IU/kg/hour targeting aPTT 1.5-2.5× control). 1, 3 One study suggests that weight-adjusted UFH followed by enoxaparin for 7 days after alteplase improves outcomes compared to standard UFH alone. 5
Diagnostic Confirmation
Imaging confirmation with CTPA is preferred before thrombolysis, but treatment must not be delayed in unstable patients. 1 High clinical suspicion combined with RV dysfunction on bedside echocardiography is sufficient to proceed with alteplase when the patient is too unstable for CT. 1 Do not perform pulmonary angiography before thrombolysis in unstable patients—it is time-consuming, hazardous, and increases bleeding risk. 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not use the 100 mg infusion in cardiac arrest—the 50 mg bolus is the correct regimen. 1
- Do not delay alteplase while awaiting imaging when cardiac arrest is imminent or the patient is in shock. 1
- Do not use alteplase routinely in intermediate-risk PE without careful risk-benefit assessment, as bleeding complications (including 2% intracranial hemorrhage) can occur. 2, 4
- Do not give aggressive fluid boluses in massive PE—this can worsen RV failure. 2
Bleeding Risk
Major bleeding occurs in 10-40% of patients receiving alteplase for PE, though no fatal or cerebral bleeding occurred in the landmark submassive PE trial. 1, 4 The risk must be weighed against the high mortality of untreated massive PE. 6