What is the recommended first‑line systemic therapy for a 70‑year‑old man with metastatic clear‑cell renal cell carcinoma involving the L2 vertebra and liver and an International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate‑risk score of 1, according to current guidelines?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

First-Line Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Clear Cell RCC with IMDC Intermediate Risk (Score 1)

For this 70-year-old gentleman with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma involving L2 vertebra and liver with IMDC intermediate risk (score 1), the recommended first-line systemic therapy is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined with a VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), specifically one of the following: pembrolizumab plus axitinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib, or pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib. 1

Standard of Care Options for IMDC Intermediate Risk

The current guidelines from the European Association of Urology (2022) and ESMO (2024) establish three ICI-based combination regimens as standard of care with Level 1b evidence for intermediate-risk disease: 1

Primary Recommended Combinations:

  • Pembrolizumab plus axitinib: Demonstrated OS HR 0.73 and PFS HR 0.68, with 60% overall response rate and 10% complete response rate at 42.8 months median follow-up 1, 2

  • Nivolumab plus cabozantinib: Showed OS HR 0.70 and PFS HR 0.56, with 56% overall response rate and 12% complete response rate at 32.9 months median follow-up 1

  • Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib: Achieved OS HR 0.72 and PFS HR 0.42, with 69% overall response rate and 17% complete response rate, though dose reductions were required in 68.8% of patients 1, 3

Alternative ICI Combination:

  • Nivolumab plus ipilimumab: Remains an option for IMDC intermediate and poor-risk disease with Level 1b evidence, showing OS HR 0.63 in the intermediate/poor-risk population, though it is specifically designed for this risk category rather than favorable risk 1, 4

Treatment Selection Algorithm

Step 1: Assess ICI eligibility - Exclude active autoimmune disease requiring systemic immunosuppression, uncontrolled brain metastases, or absolute contraindications to immunotherapy 1, 2

Step 2: If ICI-eligible (which applies to this patient), select from the three VEGFR TKI plus PD-1 inhibitor combinations based on: 1, 2

  • Toxicity profile considerations: Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib requires dose reductions in 68.8% of patients; nivolumab plus cabozantinib in 56.3%; pembrolizumab plus axitinib has more manageable toxicity 1

  • Bone metastases presence: Given this patient has L2 vertebral involvement, nivolumab plus cabozantinib may be particularly appropriate as cabozantinib has specific activity in bone metastases 5

  • Hepatic involvement: All three regimens are appropriate for liver metastases, though hepatic function monitoring is essential 1

Step 3: If ICI-contraindicated, use cabozantinib monotherapy as the preferred single-agent TKI for intermediate-risk disease with Level 2a evidence 1, 5

Why Not Other Options

  • Sunitinib or pazopanib monotherapy: These are relegated to alternative options when immunotherapy is contraindicated or unavailable, as ICI combinations have demonstrated superior overall survival 1, 2

  • Nivolumab plus ipilimumab: While approved for intermediate/poor-risk disease, the three VEGFR TKI plus PD-1 combinations offer more consistent efficacy across all intermediate-risk patients 1

  • Pembrolizumab monotherapy: Not recommended in the metastatic setting; only approved for adjuvant therapy post-nephrectomy in high-risk patients 2, 3

Critical Practical Considerations

No PD-L1 testing required: All ICI-based combinations are recommended irrespective of PD-L1 expression status, and treatment should not be delayed for biomarker testing 1, 3, 4

Treatment duration: PD-1 inhibitors in combination regimens are typically continued for 2 years or until progression, while VEGFR TKIs continue until progression or unacceptable toxicity 1

Dose modifications: Anticipate need for VEGFR TKI dose reductions (56-69% of patients across trials), which does not compromise efficacy 1

Monitoring requirements: Hepatic function monitoring is essential with all VEGFR TKIs, particularly pazopanib which has 30% grade 3 ALT elevation rates 2, 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not use single-agent TKI therapy when ICI combinations are feasible, as this represents outdated standard of care with inferior overall survival outcomes 1

Do not delay treatment for cytoreductive nephrectomy in intermediate-risk disease with multiple metastatic sites; systemic therapy should be initiated first with consideration for deferred nephrectomy in responding patients 6, 7

Do not attempt indirect comparisons between the three ICI plus VEGFR TKI combinations to select "the best" option, as head-to-head data do not exist and guidelines explicitly state no preferred combination 1, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

First-Line Treatment Options for Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Treatment of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

TKI Selection for Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

What are the adjuvant systemic therapy options for a patient with resected metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and small volume lung metastases (mets)?
Is cabozantinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) alone more effective than cabozantinib plus pembrolizumab (immunotherapy agent) in treating oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) intermediate-risk patients who have progressed on ipilimumab (immunotherapy agent) plus nivolumab (immunotherapy agent)?
What are the treatment options for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)?
What are the treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC)?
What is the initial treatment approach for a patient with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the renal pelvis presenting with hematuria?
What is the recommended initial evaluation and management—including stroke and bleeding risk assessment, anticoagulation selection, rate versus rhythm control, and necessary investigations—for an adult patient newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation?
What is the recommended treatment and management for Legionella pneumonia?
In an 81‑year‑old man who recently started lisinopril 20 mg daily and now presents with bilateral lower‑extremity edema, mild normocytic anemia, low‑normal calcium, normal renal function, and a modestly elevated monocyte count, what is the most likely cause of the edema and what is the appropriate management?
For a bipolar patient with manic or mixed episodes, should I choose valproate (Depakote) or aripiprazole (Abilify) as the mood stabilizer, considering liver disease, thrombocytopenia, pregnancy, metabolic syndrome, weight gain, or tardive dyskinesia?
Which acute coronary syndrome medications should be given to a patient with an NSTEMI and rising troponin I but no chest pain?
What is the appropriate next step in management for a patient with hepatitis C virus antibody positivity who has previously been treated?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.