What does a C‑peptide level of 0.98 ng/mL indicate about endogenous insulin secretion?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

C-Peptide of 0.98 ng/mL: Interpretation and Clinical Significance

Primary Interpretation

A C-peptide level of 0.98 ng/mL (approximately 330 pmol/L) falls in the intermediate range and indicates partial preservation of endogenous insulin secretion, most consistent with type 2 diabetes, MODY (maturity-onset diabetes of the young), or early/slowly progressive type 1 diabetes. 1, 2

Diagnostic Framework

Classification by C-Peptide Thresholds

The American Diabetes Association provides clear cutoffs for interpretation: 1, 2

  • <0.24 ng/mL (<80 pmol/L): Absolute insulin deficiency; definitive type 1 diabetes requiring insulin for survival 1, 2
  • 0.24–0.6 ng/mL (80–200 pmol/L): Consistent with type 1 diabetes 1, 2
  • 0.6–1.8 ng/mL (200–600 pmol/L): Intermediate zone where your patient falls—may indicate type 1 diabetes, MODY, or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes 1, 2
  • >1.8 ng/mL (>600 pmol/L): Strongly suggests type 2 diabetes with preserved beta-cell function 1, 2

Your Patient's Value (0.98 ng/mL)

This level demonstrates meaningful residual insulin production but is insufficient to exclude progressive beta-cell failure. 2 The clinical context—age at diagnosis, body habitus, presence of ketoacidosis, symptom severity, and autoantibody status—becomes critical for accurate classification. 1, 2

Algorithmic Approach to Further Evaluation

Step 1: Check Islet Autoantibodies

Measure GAD65, IA-2, and ZnT8 antibodies immediately. 2

  • If antibody-positive: Diagnosis is autoimmune diabetes (type 1 or LADA) regardless of C-peptide level, requiring lifelong insulin therapy 2
  • If antibody-negative: Proceed to clinical phenotyping below 1

Step 2: Clinical Phenotype Assessment

Age, BMI, and presentation pattern guide interpretation: 3

  • Younger age (<35 years), lower BMI, severe symptoms (DKA), rapid progression: More likely type 1 diabetes despite intermediate C-peptide 2, 3
  • Older age (>35 years), higher BMI, gradual onset, obesity: More likely type 2 diabetes or MODY 1, 4

Step 3: Consider Genetic Testing

If antibody-negative with strong family history and intermediate C-peptide, test for monogenic diabetes (MODY). 1, 5 MODY patients often maintain C-peptide in this range for years and may respond to sulfonylureas rather than insulin. 1

Treatment Implications Based on C-Peptide Level

If Type 2 Diabetes is Confirmed

Initiate metformin as first-line therapy because preserved beta-cell function (C-peptide 0.98 ng/mL) makes the patient an excellent candidate for insulin-sensitizing agents. 4

  • Implement intensive lifestyle modification with nutrition counseling targeting weight reduction 4
  • Target at least 60 minutes daily of moderate-to-vigorous exercise 4
  • Monitor HbA1c every 3 months and intensify treatment if target <7.0% is not achieved 4

If Type 1 Diabetes/LADA is Confirmed

Transition immediately to basal-bolus insulin regimen or insulin pump therapy with continuous glucose monitoring. 2

  • Multiple daily injections with basal and mealtime insulin are required 2
  • Consider automated insulin delivery systems for optimal control 2
  • Monitor closely for diabetic ketoacidosis, especially during illness or when glucose >250 mg/dL 2

Prognostic Significance

A C-peptide of 0.98 ng/mL predicts ongoing beta-cell function but does not guarantee stability. 5, 3

  • In type 1 diabetes, this level suggests slower progression but eventual complete insulin dependence is likely 2, 3
  • Younger patients with lower BMI and lower initial C-peptide tend to show rapid decline 3
  • In type 2 diabetes, this level indicates the patient may respond to oral agents and lifestyle modification before requiring insulin 4, 5

Critical Testing Considerations

Ensure proper testing conditions to avoid misinterpretation: 1, 2

  • Do not test within 2 weeks of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperglycemic emergency 1, 2
  • A random C-peptide within 5 hours of eating is acceptable for classification; fasting is not required 1, 2
  • If concurrent glucose was <70 mg/dL at time of sampling, repeat the test as hypoglycemia suppresses C-peptide 1
  • For insulin-treated patients, C-peptide must be measured before considering insulin discontinuation 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not assume intermediate C-peptide excludes type 1 diabetes. 2 Approximately 5–10% of adults with type 1 diabetes are antibody-negative, and 40% of adults with new type 1 diabetes are initially misdiagnosed as type 2 diabetes. 2

Do not use C-peptide alone to determine insulin therapy eligibility. 4 The American Diabetes Association recommends that low C-peptide should not be a prerequisite for insulin initiation or insulin-pump coverage in patients who are clinically insulin-deficient. 4

Recognize that C-peptide does not predict response to intensive insulin therapy once insulin deficiency is established. 1, 4 Treatment decisions should be based on clinical presentation and glycemic control, not C-peptide levels alone. 4

References

Guideline

C-peptide Testing for Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

C-Peptide Levels in Type 1 Diabetes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of High C-Peptide in Diabetic Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2013

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.