What is the most up‑to‑date stroke risk‑stratification tool for non‑valvular atrial fibrillation (CHA₂DS₂‑VA score) and how should it be applied to guide anticoagulation therapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CHA₂DS₂-VA Score: The Current Standard for Stroke Risk Stratification in Atrial Fibrillation

The 2024 ESC guidelines now recommend the CHA₂DS₂-VA score (removing the sex category from CHA₂DS₂-VASc) as the primary tool for stroke risk stratification in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, with oral anticoagulation recommended for scores ≥2 and considered for scores of 1. 1

Score Components and Point Assignment

The CHA₂DS₂-VA score assigns points as follows:

  • C (Congestive heart failure): 1 point for symptoms/signs of heart failure regardless of ejection fraction (including HFpEF, HFmrEF, HFrEF) or asymptomatic LVEF ≤40% 1
  • H (Hypertension): 1 point for resting BP >140/90 mmHg on at least two occasions or current antihypertensive treatment 1
  • A₂ (Age ≥75 years): 2 points 1
  • D (Diabetes mellitus): 1 point 1
  • S₂ (Prior Stroke/TIA/thromboembolism): 2 points 1
  • V (Vascular disease): 1 point for prior MI, peripheral artery disease, or aortic plaque 1
  • A (Age 65-74 years): 1 point 1

Maximum score: 9 points 2

Key Difference from CHA₂DS₂-VASc

The critical update in 2024 is the removal of the sex category (female = 1 point) from the original CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. 1 This change reflects evidence that female sex alone (without other risk factors) does not independently increase stroke risk sufficiently to warrant anticoagulation. 1, 2

Anticoagulation Decision Algorithm

Score = 0

  • No anticoagulation recommended 1
  • Annual stroke risk: 0-0.6% 2

Score = 1

  • Anticoagulation should be considered (Class IIa recommendation) 1
  • Requires shared decision-making balancing stroke risk against bleeding risk 1
  • Approximately 15% of AF patients fall into this intermediate-risk category 1

Score ≥2

  • Anticoagulation is recommended (Class I recommendation) 1
  • Annual stroke risk increases progressively: Score 2 (2.2%), Score 3 (3.2%), Score 4 (4.0%), Score 5 (6.7%), Score 6 (9.8%) 2
  • Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) preferred over warfarin 1

Clinical Application Pitfalls

Common scoring errors to avoid:

  • Age miscalculation: Age 65-74 receives 1 point, age ≥75 receives 2 points (total of 2 points, not 3) 1, 2
  • Hypertension definition: Both treated/controlled hypertension AND untreated hypertension count equally for 1 point 2
  • Female sex no longer counted: Do not add a point for female sex in the CHA₂DS₂-VA score 1
  • Vascular disease often missed: Must actively assess for prior MI, PAD, or aortic plaque 1

Special Populations

Atrial Flutter

  • Treat identically to atrial fibrillation using the same CHA₂DS₂-VA scoring and anticoagulation thresholds 2

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy or Cardiac Amyloidosis

  • Anticoagulation recommended regardless of CHA₂DS₂-VA score (Class I recommendation) 1

Device-Detected Subclinical AF

  • DOAC therapy may be considered (Class IIb recommendation) in patients with elevated thromboembolic risk, excluding those at high bleeding risk 1

Antiplatelet Therapy

Antiplatelet drugs (aspirin alone or aspirin plus clopidogrel) are NOT recommended as an alternative to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF (Class III recommendation). 1

Reassessment Requirements

Periodic reassessment of thromboembolic risk is mandatory (Class I recommendation) to ensure anticoagulation is initiated when patients develop new risk factors that increase their CHA₂DS₂-VA score. 1

Comparison with American Guidelines

The 2024 AHA stroke prevention guidelines continue to reference CHA₂DS₂-VASc (with sex category included), recommending anticoagulation for annual stroke risk ≥2%, generally corresponding to CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2 in men or ≥3 in women. 1 However, the most recent 2024 ESC guidelines represent the current international consensus favoring CHA₂DS₂-VA. 1

Limitations

The CHA₂DS₂-VA score has modest predictive accuracy (C-statistic 0.6-0.7) and does not incorporate other potential risk factors such as impaired kidney function, cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, obesity, or smoking. 1 Clinicians should assess for additional thromboembolic risk factors beyond the score components. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

CHA₂DS₂-VASc Risk Stratification for Atrial Fibrillation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

Is the CHA₂DS₂‑VASc score used only for non‑valvular atrial fibrillation and not applicable to patients with mechanical heart valves or moderate‑to‑severe mitral stenosis?
In which adult patients with non‑valvular atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter should the CHA₂DS₂‑VASc score be used to assess stroke risk and guide anticoagulation decisions?
What is the CH2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, 2 points for age ≥75 years, Diabetes, Stroke/Transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism, Vascular disease, Age 65-74 years, Sex category) score for an older male, ≥75 years, with a history of stroke, but otherwise medically free?
What is the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score for a 66-year-old male with Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Hypertension (HTN), history of stroke, and a cardiac examination revealing an S3 heart sound and distended Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP)?
What is the difference between valvular (involving heart valves) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AFib)?
What is the recommended acute evaluation and management for a patient presenting with new‑onset aphasia?
In an adult with confirmed or high‑risk radial artery thrombosis, what are the indications, dosing, and duration for aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) therapy?
Can a forceful Valsalva strain during bathroom use three years ago cause a persistent sensory deficit in bladder‑filling sensation while preserving normal voiding and a normal post‑void residual without other neurologic red‑flags?
What are the recommended diagnostic and treatment options for molluscum contagiosum?
What is the difference between bidirectional nystagmus and endpoint (null‑point) nystagmus?
How should a deep fissure of the foot be treated?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.