What is the evidence supporting plasma exchange (PE) as an adjunctive therapy in adult acute liver failure (ALF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Plasma Exchange in Acute Liver Failure

Direct Recommendation

Plasma exchange should be used in adult acute liver failure patients with hyperammonemia (ammonia >150 μmol/L) as adjunctive therapy to bridge to transplantation or support spontaneous recovery, with the strongest evidence supporting its use in Wilson disease-related ALF where it should be initiated immediately. 1


Evidence-Based Framework

Primary Indication: Hyperammonemia in ALF

  • The American College of Critical Care Medicine recommends plasma exchange for ALF patients with ammonia levels >150 μmol/L, though this is a conditional recommendation based on low-quality evidence. 1

  • Hyperammonemia independently predicts intracranial hypertension and hepatic encephalopathy in ALF, with 55% of patients developing intracranial hypertension when ammonia exceeds 200 μmol/L. 1

  • ALF patients are particularly vulnerable to cerebral edema and intracranial hypertension due to hyperammonemia, unlike those with acute-on-chronic liver failure. 1

Specific Etiologies Requiring Immediate Plasma Exchange

  • Wilson disease-related ALF requires immediate plasma exchange initiation as a bridge to transplantation, as this presentation is uniformly fatal without transplant. 1

  • Plasma exchange should be considered in acute fatty liver of pregnancy, though expeditious delivery remains the primary treatment. 1

Survival Benefit Evidence

  • A 2024 meta-analysis of 343 ALF patients demonstrated that plasma exchange significantly improved 30-day survival (RR 1.41,95% CI 1.06-1.87, p=0.02) and overall survival (RR 1.35,95% CI 1.12-1.63, p=0.002) compared to standard medical therapy. 2

  • A 2025 real-world Mexican study showed 92% survival at 30 days in the plasma exchange group versus 50% in standard medical treatment alone (p=0.02), with the greatest benefit in Grade 4 encephalopathy patients. 3

  • High-volume plasma exchange (8-12 L per procedure) improved transplant-free survival in a 2016 multicenter RCT of 182 ALF patients (HR 0.56, p=0.0083). 1

Contradictory Evidence

However, a 2025 UK multicentre study of 378 ALF patients found no survival benefit from plasma exchange in real-world practice (overall survival 51.4% vs 62.6% for standard therapy, p=0.12), despite improvements in hemodynamic parameters. 4 This represents the most recent high-quality evidence but conflicts with earlier trials, possibly reflecting selection bias or differences in patient populations and timing of intervention.


Clinical Algorithm for ALF

Step 1: Confirm ALF Diagnosis

  • Absence of known chronic liver disease with liver-based coagulopathy (INR ≥1.5) and hepatic encephalopathy. 5

Step 2: Measure Ammonia Level

  • If ammonia >150 μmol/L: Initiate plasma exchange as adjunctive therapy. 1
  • If Wilson disease suspected or confirmed: Initiate plasma exchange immediately regardless of ammonia level. 1

Step 3: Simultaneous Actions

  • List for liver transplantation in appropriate candidates, as plasma exchange is a bridge therapy, not definitive treatment. 1
  • Provide standard supportive care including management of coagulopathy, hemodynamic support, and treatment of precipitating factors. 1

Step 4: Consider High-Volume Plasma Exchange

  • For patients with high severity scores (CLIF-C ACLF ≥13) or Grade 4 encephalopathy, high-volume plasma exchange (8-12 L per procedure) may provide additional benefit. 6, 3

Important Caveats

Resource and Expertise Requirements

  • The conditional nature of guideline recommendations means clinical circumstances and resource availability should influence decisions. 1
  • Plasma exchange requires access to experienced operators at centers with expertise. 7

What NOT to Use

  • Traditional therapies for chronic liver failure, such as lactulose and rifaximin, have not demonstrated benefit in acute liver failure and should not be relied upon. 1

Mechanism of Benefit

  • Plasma exchange removes inflammatory cytokines, damage-associated molecular patterns, and endotoxin while improving coagulopathy, total bilirubin, transaminases, and ammonia levels. 8, 6

Distinction from ACLF

This recommendation applies specifically to acute liver failure, NOT acute-on-chronic liver failure. The European Association for the Study of the Liver explicitly recommends against routine plasma exchange for ACLF outside research trials. 7, 9 The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases suggests plasma exchange only for ALF with hyperammonemia, not for ACLF. 7, 9

References

Guideline

Plasma Exchange in Acute Liver Failure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Plasma exchange for acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society, 2024

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Plasma Exchange in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Therapeutic plasma-exchange improves systemic inflammation and survival in acute-on-chronic liver failure: A propensity-score matched study from AARC.

Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2021

Guideline

Plasma Exchange for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.