D-Dimer Testing in Pulmonary Embolism
When to Order D-Dimer Testing
D-dimer should only be ordered in patients with low or intermediate pre-test probability of PE who do not meet all eight PERC criteria; patients with high pre-test probability must proceed directly to CT pulmonary angiography without D-dimer testing. 1, 2
Clinical Probability Assessment First
- Calculate a validated clinical probability score (Wells or revised Geneva) before ordering any D-dimer test 1, 2
- Never allow D-dimer results to influence your clinical probability assessment—assess the patient first, then order the test 3
- Low probability patients have ~3-13% PE prevalence, intermediate ~16-26%, and high ~36-50% 2
Low Pre-Test Probability Patients
- Apply the eight PERC criteria: age <50 years, heart rate <100 bpm, oxygen saturation ≥95%, no unilateral leg swelling, no hemoptysis, no recent trauma/surgery within 4 weeks, no prior VTE history, and no hormone use 1, 2
- If all eight PERC criteria are met, no D-dimer or imaging is needed—PE is safely excluded 1, 2
- If any PERC criterion is not met, order a high-sensitivity quantitative D-dimer (ELISA or turbidimetric assay with ≥95% sensitivity) 1, 2
Intermediate Pre-Test Probability Patients
- Order high-sensitivity D-dimer as the initial diagnostic test 1, 2
- D-dimer can safely exclude PE in this population when below the appropriate threshold 1
High Pre-Test Probability Patients
- Proceed directly to CT pulmonary angiography without D-dimer testing 1, 2
- A normal D-dimer does not safely exclude PE in high-probability patients—the 3-month VTE rate is 9.3% even with negative D-dimer 3
- D-dimer testing in this population wastes time and resources 2
Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Thresholds
For patients over 50 years old, use an age-adjusted cutoff calculated as age × 10 ng/mL (e.g., 70 years = 700 ng/mL cutoff) rather than the standard 500 ng/mL threshold. 1, 2
Rationale for Age Adjustment
- D-dimer specificity decreases steadily with age, dropping to only 10% in patients >80 years when using the standard 500 ng/mL cutoff 1, 2
- Age-adjusted thresholds maintain sensitivity >97% while improving specificity across all older age groups 1, 2
- This approach increased the proportion of elderly patients in whom PE could be safely excluded from 6.4% to 30% without additional false-negative findings 1, 2
Specific Specificity Improvements by Age Group
- Ages 51-60: specificity increases from 57.6% to 62.3% 2
- Ages 61-70: specificity increases from 39.4% to 49.5% 2
- Ages 71-80: specificity increases from 24.5% to 44.2% 2
- Ages >80: specificity increases from 14.7% to 35.2% 2
Interpreting D-Dimer Results and Subsequent Imaging Decisions
Negative D-Dimer (Below Appropriate Threshold)
- PE is safely excluded—no imaging is required 1, 2
- The 3-month thromboembolic risk is <1% in low or intermediate probability patients with negative D-dimer 1, 2
- Negative predictive value reaches 94.4-99.5% when combined with appropriate clinical probability assessment 4, 3
Positive D-Dimer (Above Threshold)
- Proceed immediately to multidetector CT pulmonary angiography 1, 2
- D-dimer has high sensitivity but poor specificity—positive results require imaging confirmation 1, 2
- Accept PE diagnosis without further testing if CTPA shows segmental or more proximal filling defect 5
Markedly Elevated D-Dimer (>2,000-2,152 ng/mL)
- Proceed directly to CTPA even in patients with "unlikely" clinical probability scores due to significantly increased positive predictive value of 36-53% 5, 6
- D-dimer levels ≥2,152 ng/mL warrant hospital admission consideration even without severe symptoms 5, 6
Special Populations and D-Dimer Performance
Hospitalized Patients
- D-dimer specificity is lower due to comorbidities, but sensitivity remains high—testing remains appropriate 1, 2
- The number needed to test rises from 3 in the emergency department to >10 in hospitalized patients 1, 2
Cancer Patients
- D-dimer is frequently elevated due to tumor-associated hypercoagulability, with specificity dropping to 18-21% 1, 2
- A negative D-dimer still safely excludes PE when combined with low/intermediate probability 2
Pregnant Patients
- D-dimer levels increase progressively during pregnancy, with third-trimester normal range 0.16-1.3 μg/mL (up to 2.0 μg/mL may be normal) 5
- Consider lower-extremity venous ultrasonography before CT in first trimester to reduce radiation exposure 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never order D-dimer without first assessing clinical probability—this is the most common error and leads to misinterpretation 2, 3
- Never use the standard 500 ng/mL cutoff in patients >50 years—this leads to unnecessary imaging due to poor specificity 1, 2
- Never order D-dimer in high-probability patients—it wastes time and has insufficient negative predictive value 1, 2, 3
- Never rely on point-of-care D-dimer assays when laboratory-based tests are available—they have lower sensitivity (88% vs. 95%) and should only be used in low pre-test probability patients 1, 2
- Never proceed directly to CTPA in low/intermediate probability patients without D-dimer testing—D-dimer can safely exclude PE in 30-50% of such cases, avoiding unnecessary radiation and contrast exposure 5
Diagnostic Algorithm Summary
- Assess clinical probability using Wells or revised Geneva score 1, 2
- Low probability: Apply PERC criteria → if all met, stop; if not met, order high-sensitivity D-dimer 1, 2
- Intermediate probability: Order high-sensitivity D-dimer 1, 2
- High probability: Skip D-dimer and obtain CTPA immediately 1, 2
- Interpret D-dimer using age-adjusted cutoffs (≤50 years: <500 ng/mL; >50 years: <age × 10 ng/mL) 1, 2
- Negative result: PE excluded, no imaging needed 1, 2
- Positive result: Proceed to CTPA 1, 2