What is the APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) score and how is it calculated?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 3, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

APACHE Score: Definition and Calculation

What is the APACHE Score?

The APACHE II score is a severity-of-illness scoring system that predicts mortality risk in critically ill patients by incorporating 12 physiologic variables, age, chronic health status, and admission type, with scores ranging from 0 to 71 points. 1

  • APACHE II was introduced in 1985 to reflect both premorbid factors (patient age and chronic medical conditions) and acute physiologic derangements in critically ill patients. 1
  • The score is calculated using the worst values recorded during the first 24 hours of ICU admission, though admission-only values maintain similar discriminative ability. 2
  • APACHE II demonstrates superior mortality prediction compared to other scoring systems, with a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81. 1

Components of APACHE II Calculation

Acute Physiology Score (APS) – 12 Variables

The acute physiology component assigns 0-4 points for each variable based on deviation from normal:

  • Temperature (rectal core temperature) 3
  • Mean arterial pressure 3
  • Heart rate 3
  • Respiratory rate 3
  • Oxygenation: Use A-aDO₂ if FiO₂ ≥0.5, or PaO₂ if FiO₂ <0.5 3
  • Arterial pH (preferred) or serum HCO₃ if no arterial blood gas available 3
  • Serum sodium 3
  • Serum potassium 3
  • Serum creatinine (double points if acute renal failure present) 3
  • Hematocrit 3
  • White blood cell count 3
  • Glasgow Coma Scale: Score = 15 minus actual GCS 3

Age Points

  • <44 years: 0 points
  • 45-54 years: 2 points
  • 55-64 years: 3 points
  • 65-74 years: 5 points
  • ≥75 years: 6 points 1

Chronic Health Evaluation

Assign 5 points for nonoperative or emergency postoperative patients, or 2 points for elective postoperative patients if any of the following apply:

  • Severe organ insufficiency (liver, cardiovascular, respiratory, renal)
  • Immunocompromised state 1

Clinical Interpretation and Risk Stratification

Mortality Prediction Thresholds

  • APACHE II ≥8: Optimal cut-off for mortality prediction with 83.3% sensitivity and 91% specificity; triggers enhanced monitoring protocols. 1
  • APACHE II ≥15: Indicates severe disease; consider continuous or extended infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics for severe infections, which improves clinical cure rates and reduces mortality. 1
  • APACHE II ≥20: Continuous beta-lactam administration shows reduced mortality (RR 0.73) compared to intermittent dosing. 1
  • APACHE II score of 15: Provides best diagnostic accuracy for predicting mortality with 85.3% sensitivity and 77.4% specificity. 4

Guideline-Endorsed Applications

  • The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends APACHE II as the preferred severity-of-illness score for risk stratification in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections when calculated within 24 hours of hospitalization or ICU admission. 5
  • The American College of Surgeons recommends APACHE II for acute pancreatitis assessment, with scores ≥8 indicating severe disease and demonstrating the highest accuracy (AUC 0.88) for predicting complications. 6
  • Regular recalculation of APACHE II provides critical information about disease progression or recovery, with pattern changes indicating treatment response or onset of complications. 1

Advantages Over Alternative Scoring Systems

  • APACHE II outperforms SOFA in discriminative power for mortality prediction (AUC 0.81 vs. 0.75). 1
  • Unlike SOFA, APACHE II incorporates age and chronic comorbidities, which are important prognostic factors. 1
  • APACHE II can be calculated at any time and used for daily ongoing assessment throughout the ICU stay. 6

Important Caveats and Limitations

  • The APACHE II calculation is cumbersome and not all required parameters are routinely collected in every ICU. 1
  • Pre-ICU care quality can significantly impact physiological measurements, potentially creating "lead time bias" in mortality predictions. 1
  • The original US APACHE II model requires regional recalibration when applied to different healthcare systems, as care patterns before ICU admission vary internationally. 1
  • APACHE II was designed for population-level risk stratification and research purposes, not for individual patient triage decisions or to dictate specific treatment choices. 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.