Boezaart Grading System for Intraoperative Bleeding in Sinus Surgery
The Boezaart grading system is a 6-point scale (0-5) used to assess the quality of the surgical field during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), where lower scores indicate less bleeding and better visualization. 1
Scale Description and Application
The Boezaart scale evaluates the endoscopic field of view during FESS based on the degree of bleeding present:
- Grade 0-2: Represents a "clean surgical field" with minimal to moderate bleeding that allows adequate visualization 2
- Higher scores (3-5): Indicate progressively worse bleeding that impairs surgical visualization and may compromise safety 1
The scale is applied by the surgeon or observer during the procedure to document intraoperative bleeding conditions in real-time. 1
Clinical Utility and Limitations
The Boezaart scale has been widely used in research evaluating hemostatic interventions during FESS, including studies on tranexamic acid, desmopressin, and patient positioning. 3, 2, 4, 5
Key Applications:
- Outcome measurement: Used as a primary endpoint in clinical trials assessing bleeding reduction strategies 3, 2
- Surgical field assessment: Helps quantify the impact of interventions like reverse Trendelenburg positioning (15-20 degrees), which significantly improves Boezaart scores (mean scores of 1.4-1.66 vs 2.33 in horizontal position) 4, 5
- Standardization: When combined with standardized video-endoscopy techniques, inter-rater reliability improves to 0.74 1
Important Limitations:
A newer 11-point Wormald grading scale has demonstrated superior performance compared to the Boezaart scale, with significantly higher inter-rater (0.80 vs 0.74) and intra-rater (0.89 vs 0.83) reliability. 1 The Wormald scale also shows greater sensitivity to changes in the most common surgical field conditions encountered during FESS. 1
Practical Considerations
For optimal use of any bleeding grading system during FESS, standardized video-endoscopy documentation is essential as it significantly improves both reliability and reproducibility of assessments. 1
The scale is most meaningful when: