Summarize the different SURPASS phase 3 clinical trials of tirzepatide (Mounjaro).

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 5, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

SURPASS Phase 3 Clinical Trial Program for Tirzepatide

Overview of the SURPASS Program

The SURPASS phase 3 clinical development program established tirzepatide's efficacy across five major trials (SURPASS-1 through SURPASS-5), demonstrating superior glycemic control and weight reduction compared to placebo and active comparators including semaglutide, insulin degludec, and insulin glargine. 1

Individual SURPASS Trials

SURPASS-1: Monotherapy Trial

  • Design: 40-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 478 treatment-naive patients with inadequate glycemic control on diet and exercise alone 1, 2
  • Population: Mean age 54 years, baseline HbA1c 7.9%, mean BMI 32 kg/m², diabetes duration 4.7 years 1, 2
  • Interventions: Tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg once weekly versus placebo 1, 2

Key Results at 40 weeks:

  • HbA1c reduction: -1.87% (5 mg), -1.89% (10 mg), -2.07% (15 mg) versus +0.04% with placebo (all p<0.0001) 1, 2
  • HbA1c <7% achievement: 82-85% with tirzepatide versus 23% with placebo 1, 2
  • HbA1c <5.7% achievement: 31-52% with tirzepatide versus 1% with placebo 2
  • Weight loss: -6.3 kg (5 mg), -7.0 kg (10 mg), -7.8 kg (15 mg) versus -1.0 kg with placebo 1, 2
  • Safety: Most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea 12-18%, diarrhea 12-14%, vomiting 2-6%); no clinically significant hypoglycemia reported 2

SURPASS-2: Head-to-Head Comparison with Semaglutide

  • Design: 40-week, open-label trial in 1,879 patients comparing tirzepatide directly to semaglutide 1 mg 1, 3
  • Population: Mean baseline HbA1c 8.28%, mean age 56.6 years, mean weight 93.7 kg 3
  • Interventions: Tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg versus semaglutide 1 mg, all as add-on to metformin, SGLT2 inhibitors, and/or sulfonylureas 1, 3

Key Results at 40 weeks:

  • HbA1c reduction: -2.01% (5 mg), -2.24% (10 mg), -2.30% (15 mg) with tirzepatide versus -1.86% with semaglutide 3
  • Treatment differences versus semaglutide: -0.15% (5 mg, p=0.02), -0.39% (10 mg, p<0.001), -0.45% (15 mg, p<0.001) 3
  • Weight loss superiority: Greater reductions with tirzepatide by -1.9 kg (5 mg), -3.6 kg (10 mg), -5.5 kg (15 mg) compared to semaglutide (all p<0.001) 3
  • Safety: Gastrointestinal events similar between groups (nausea 17-22% vs 18%, diarrhea 13-16% vs 12%); hypoglycemia <54 mg/dL occurred in 0.2-1.7% with tirzepatide versus 0.4% with semaglutide 3

SURPASS-3: Comparison with Insulin Degludec

  • Design: 52-week trial comparing tirzepatide to insulin degludec as add-on therapy to metformin with or without SGLT2 inhibitors 1, 4
  • Key Results: Tirzepatide demonstrated superior HbA1c reduction (mean difference -1.08%, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.78) and weight loss (mean difference -10.61 kg, 95% CI -13.24 to -7.97) compared to insulin degludec 4
  • Hypoglycemia advantage: Lower risk of hypoglycemia (blood glucose ≤70 mg/dL) with tirzepatide (RR 0.46,95% CI 0.28-0.75) 4

SURPASS-4: Long-term Cardiovascular Safety Trial

  • Design: 52-week trial in patients with increased cardiovascular risk, comparing tirzepatide to insulin glargine 1, 4
  • Population: Patients with established cardiovascular disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors 1
  • Key Results: Consistent superiority in glycemic control and weight reduction; tirzepatide probably reduces severe hypoglycemia compared to insulin (RR 0.21,95% CI 0.11-0.38, moderate certainty of evidence) 5

SURPASS-5: Combination with Basal Insulin

  • Design: 40-week trial evaluating tirzepatide as add-on to basal insulin with or without metformin 1
  • Key Results: Demonstrated efficacy in patients already on insulin therapy, with significant improvements in glycemic control and weight reduction 1

Meta-Analysis Findings Across SURPASS Trials

Glycemic Control

  • Network meta-analysis: Tirzepatide achieved mean HbA1c reduction of approximately -2.0 to -2.3% across doses, though substantial heterogeneity limited precise pooled estimates due to variable use of rescue medications 5

Weight Loss

  • Exceptional efficacy: Tirzepatide produced mean weight reduction of -8.47 kg (95% CI -9.49 to -7.45 kg) compared to usual care, substantially exceeding GLP-1 agonists (-2.22 kg) and SGLT2 inhibitors (-2.48 kg) 5
  • 10% weight loss achievement: 3-67% of tirzepatide-treated patients achieved ≥10% weight reduction (dose-dependent) versus 0% with insulin glargine and 6.7% with usual care 5

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects

  • Lipid improvements: Significant reductions in total cholesterol (-4.78%), triglycerides (-14.49%), LDL cholesterol (-5.98%), and VLDL cholesterol (-14.18%), with increased HDL cholesterol (+7.13%) 4
  • Blood pressure: Reductions in systolic BP (-6.47 mmHg) and diastolic BP (-2.30 mmHg) 4

Safety Profile

  • Hypoglycemia: Tirzepatide does not differ from usual care for severe hypoglycemia (RR 1.32,95% CI 0.78-2.22, moderate certainty of evidence), but probably reduces severe hypoglycemia compared to insulin (RR 0.21,95% CI 0.11-0.38) 5
  • Serious adverse events: Tirzepatide does not differ from usual care (RR 0.79,95% CI 0.51-1.22, high certainty of evidence) 5
  • Gastrointestinal events: Consistent mild-to-moderate nausea (12-22%), diarrhea (12-16%), and vomiting (2-10%) across all trials 2, 3

Patient-Reported Outcomes

Quality of life improvements were consistently demonstrated across all five SURPASS trials using validated instruments including EQ-5D-5L, Impact of Weight on Self-Perceptions, and Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, with higher doses generally producing greater improvements. 6

Clinical Implications

  • Dose-dependent efficacy: All three doses (5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg) showed superiority, with 10 mg and 15 mg demonstrating the most robust effects 1, 3
  • Effectiveness across populations: Benefits were consistent regardless of age, gender, race, ethnicity, baseline BMI, HbA1c, diabetes duration, or renal function 1
  • Positioning: The SURPASS program established tirzepatide as the most potent glucose and weight-lowering agent available for type 2 diabetes management 7

Related Questions

Why might a patient experience weight gain while being treated with tirzepatide?
Is it safe to combine tirzepatide (Mounjaro) with scopolamine, and how should any increased gastrointestinal side effects be managed?
Can a patient with hypothyroidism be prescribed tirzepatide (generic)?
How many weekly injections of tirzepatide (Mounjaro) are needed to cure diabetes?
Can tirzepatide (Mounjaro) be initiated in a patient with hyperthyroidism, and what precautions are required?
What is the recommended management of an anterior open bite in a child with obstructive sleep apnea?
In a 68-year-old obese male (BMI ~36) with a history of atrial fibrillation controlled by two ablations, a permanent pacemaker, a Watchman left‑atrial appendage closure device, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic heart failure, is it safe to initiate a GLP‑1 receptor agonist such as semaglutide (Ozempic) or tirzepatide (Mounjaro) for weight loss without increasing the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence?
When should N‑acetylcysteine (acetylcysteine) be preferred over ambroxol for mucolytic therapy, and what are the recommended dosing regimens for each?
In a 29-year-old man with recurrent facial pain, nasal congestion, clear nasal discharge, and now fever and unilateral maxillary tenderness after initial improvement, what is the best next step in management?
What is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)?
Is oral testosterone undecanoate the same formulation as the intramuscular injectable testosterone undecanoate?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.