What is the assessment of a 5-month-old male infant who is breastfeeding, eating pureed fruits, and demonstrating developmental milestones, with normal vital signs and a normal physical examination?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

This 5-month-old boy should continue breastfeeding while gradually introducing more solid foods, as the current evidence strongly supports the benefits of breastfeeding for his health, development, and future risk reduction of various diseases, as indicated by studies such as 1 and 1.

Developmental Assessment

The boy's developmental milestones are appropriate for his age, including:

  • Pushing up from prone position
  • Rolling from front to back
  • Babbling
  • Reaching for objects His physical examination is normal, with:
  • Open, soft, and flat anterior fontanelle
  • Normal positioning of eyes and ears
  • Intact palate
  • Supple neck
  • Normal cardiopulmonary examination
  • Soft abdomen without organomegaly
  • Unremarkable skin

Nutrition and Feeding

His nutrition appears adequate with successful breastfeeding and appropriate introduction of solid foods (pureed fruits).

  • Breastfeeding has been shown to reduce the risk of various diseases, including SIDS, infant mortality, and childhood obesity, as seen in studies such as 1.
  • The introduction of solid foods should continue, with a variety of foods introduced at 6 months of age, as recommended by the WHO and supported by studies such as 1.

Future Recommendations

Developmentally, he should be encouraged to:

  • Practice sitting with support
  • Reach for objects
  • Engage in social interactions Parents should continue to provide a safe environment as he becomes more mobile. Regular well-child visits should continue, with the next visit typically scheduled at 6 months of age when additional vaccines will be due. The normal examination findings and appropriate developmental progress suggest this infant is thriving and developing as expected. As indicated by 1, continued breastfeeding and appropriate introduction of solid foods will support his health, development, and future risk reduction of various diseases.

From the Research

Vaccine Administration and Safety

  • The patient is a 5-month-old boy who has been breastfeeding well and recently began eating pureed fruits, and has been developing normally [no reference provided].
  • Studies have shown that combination vaccines such as DTaP-HepB-IPV are safe and well tolerated when coadministered with PCV and Hib at 2,4, and 6 months of age 2, 3.
  • The safety of DTaP-HepB-IPV vaccine coadministered with PCV and Hib was compared with separate administration of DTaP, HepB, IPV, Hib, and PCV, and no significant difference was found in the incidence of fever >101.3 degrees F after the first dose 2.
  • Another study found that DTaP-HepB-IPV was highly immunogenic and well tolerated when coadministered with Hib and PCV-7 at 2,4, and 6 months of age, with higher rates of irritability, fever, and some local symptoms compared to separate vaccines 3.

Immunogenicity of Combination Vaccines

  • A study compared the immunogenicity and safety of a combination vaccine (DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib) with separate administration of licensed equivalent vaccines, and found that the combination vaccine was immunogenic and well tolerated, with similar or fewer solicited injection-site and systemic reactions 4.
  • Another study found that DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib elicited similar or higher antibody geometric mean concentrations to pertussis toxoid and filamentous hemagglutinin compared to separate vaccines 4.
  • A phase III study compared the immunogenicity and safety of fully liquid DTaP₅-IPV-Hib with DTaP₃-IPV/Hib, both coadministered with PCV7, and found that seroprotection rates for DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib were high and noninferior to DTaP(3)-IPV/Hib for the primary series 5.

Concomitant Administration of Vaccines

  • A study evaluated the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (7VPnC) concurrently administered with a combination DTaP-IPV-Hib vaccine, and found that both vaccines were generally well-tolerated, although there were minor differences in the frequency of local reactions and somewhat more fever or drowsiness in the 7VPnC group 6.
  • The study also found that the use of DTaP-IPV-Hib and the 7VPnC vaccine was safe, well-tolerated, and immunogenic when given concomitantly at age 2,3, and 4 months or when given separately with 7VPnC as a catch-up vaccination at age 6,7,8 months and as a concomitant booster immunization at age 11-15 months 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.