What is the recommended dosing and treatment regimen for serplulimab in first‑line chemo‑immunotherapy for extensive‑stage small‑cell lung cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 7, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Serplulimab for First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Serplulimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) combined with carboplatin and etoposide, followed by maintenance serplulimab, is an effective first-line treatment option for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), though it is not currently included in the most recent ASCO or NCCN guidelines as a preferred regimen.

Recommended Dosing Regimen

Based on the ASTRUM-005 trial 1, the standard serplulimab regimen is:

  • Induction phase: Serplulimab 4.5 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks combined with:

    • Carboplatin (AUC 5) IV every 3 weeks
    • Etoposide 100 mg/m² IV days 1-3 every 3 weeks
    • Duration: 4 cycles (up to 12 weeks)
  • Maintenance phase: Serplulimab 4.5 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks as monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Evidence Quality and Guideline Status

While the 2023 ASCO-Ontario Health guideline 2 recommends first-line chemo-immunotherapy for ES-SCLC, it specifically endorses only atezolizumab or durvalumab as preferred immunotherapy agents (Category 1, High evidence quality, Strong recommendation). The guideline does mention the ASTRUM-005 trial showing serplulimab's efficacy (median OS 15.4 vs 10.9 months, HR 0.63, p<0.001; median PFS 5.7 vs 4.3 months, HR 0.48) 2, but serplulimab is not included in the formal recommendations.

The NCCN 2022 guidelines 3 similarly recommend only atezolizumab or durvalumab plus chemotherapy as Category 1 preferred regimens for ES-SCLC, with no mention of serplulimab.

Clinical Efficacy

The ASTRUM-005 phase 3 trial 1 demonstrated robust efficacy in 585 treatment-naïve ES-SCLC patients:

  • Overall survival: 15.4 months (serplulimab) vs 10.9 months (placebo), HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.49-0.82, p<0.001)
  • Progression-free survival: 5.7 months vs 4.3 months, HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.38-0.59)
  • Objective response rate: 80.2% vs 70.4%

Updated results with 19.8 months median follow-up 4 confirmed sustained benefit with median OS of 15.8 months in the serplulimab group.

Safety Profile

Treatment-related adverse events grade ≥3 occurred in 33.2% of serplulimab patients vs 27.6% with placebo 1. The safety profile was comparable to other PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors used in ES-SCLC, with immune-related adverse events being manageable.

A recent real-world comparison 5 showed no significant differences in PFS between serplulimab and PD-L1 inhibitors (durvalumab, atezolizumab, adebrelimab), though adebrelimab demonstrated superior OS compared to serplulimab (23.2 vs 15.0 months, p=0.029).

Clinical Context and Positioning

The key limitation is that serplulimab lacks FDA approval in the United States and is not endorsed by major Western guidelines. The ASTRUM-005 trial was conducted primarily in China 1, and serplulimab appears to be used predominantly in Asian markets.

For patients in regions where serplulimab is available, it represents a viable alternative to atezolizumab or durvalumab based on comparable efficacy demonstrated in the phase 3 trial. However, in the United States and most Western countries, clinicians should prioritize guideline-recommended regimens: carboplatin/etoposide plus either atezolizumab or durvalumab 2, 3.

Predictive Biomarkers

Exploratory analysis 4 identified potential predictive markers for serplulimab benefit:

  • RB1 mutations associated with improved outcomes
  • Notch pathway mutations linked to better response
  • A 15-protein signature correlated with longer OS and PFS
  • Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and LDH as independent prognostic factors

These biomarkers require validation before clinical implementation.

Important Caveats

  • Serplulimab is not FDA-approved and not included in ASCO or NCCN guidelines as a recommended option
  • Cost-effectiveness analyses 6, 7, 8 suggest serplulimab may not be cost-effective even in China without significant price reductions
  • Direct head-to-head comparisons with atezolizumab or durvalumab are lacking
  • The evidence base is primarily from a single phase 3 trial conducted in Asian populations

For clinical practice in the United States, use carboplatin/etoposide plus atezolizumab (1200 mg maintenance) or durvalumab as first-line therapy for ES-SCLC 2, 3. Serplulimab should only be considered in regions where it has regulatory approval and when guideline-recommended agents are unavailable.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.