What is the recommended follow-up for a 77-year-old male with a history of a 10 mm polyp in the ascending colon 3 years ago: Cologuard (Multitarget Stool DNA test) or repeat colonoscopy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

For a 77-year-old male with a history of a 10 mm polyp in the ascending colon 3 years ago, a repeat colonoscopy is recommended over Cologuard for follow-up. This recommendation is based on the most recent and highest quality study, which suggests that individuals with a history of polyps, particularly those with polyps ≥1 cm, are at increased risk for advanced neoplasia 1. The size of the polyp (10 mm) is significant, and according to the NCCN guidelines, a repeat colonoscopy is recommended in 3 years for patients with high-risk polyps, which includes those with polyps ≥1 cm 1.

Key Considerations

  • The patient's history of a 10 mm polyp places them at increased risk for advanced neoplasia, making colonoscopy a preferred method for follow-up.
  • Colonoscopy offers the advantage of both detection and removal of any new polyps in a single procedure.
  • The recommended interval for surveillance colonoscopy after removal of a 10 mm polyp is typically 3-5 years, so the patient is currently within the appropriate timeframe for follow-up.
  • While Cologuard is a non-invasive option with good sensitivity for detecting colorectal cancer, it has lower sensitivity for detecting precancerous polyps compared to colonoscopy 1.
  • A positive Cologuard test would still necessitate a follow-up colonoscopy, potentially delaying definitive management.

Individual Factors to Consider

  • The patient's age of 77, overall health status, life expectancy, and comorbidities should also be considered when making this decision.
  • However, based on the history of a significant polyp, colonoscopy provides the most thorough evaluation, and its benefits outweigh the risks in this case 1.

From the Research

Comparison of Cologuard and Repeat Colonoscopy

  • Cologuard is a non-invasive, multi-target stool DNA test that has been approved by the FDA for average-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening 2.
  • Repeat colonoscopy is an invasive procedure that is commonly used for CRC screening and surveillance.
  • A study comparing the diagnostic performance of multitarget stool DNA and CT colonography for non-invasive CRC screening found that CT colonography had higher positive predictive values for any neoplasm, advanced neoplasia, and CRC compared to multitarget stool DNA 3.

Considerations for Follow-up

  • The patient had a 10 mm polyp in the ascending colon 3 years ago, which increases the risk of developing colorectal cancer.
  • A study on fecal DNA testing for CRC screening found that multitarget stool DNA testing had a sensitivity of 92% for detection of CRC, but lower specificity compared to fecal immunochemical testing 4.
  • Another study found that a positive multitarget stool DNA test was associated with a higher risk of finding any neoplasia on colonoscopy compared to a positive fecal immunochemical test 5.

Decision Making

  • The choice between Cologuard and repeat colonoscopy for follow-up depends on various factors, including the patient's risk profile, preferences, and medical history.
  • While Cologuard is a non-invasive and convenient option, repeat colonoscopy may be more effective in detecting and removing precancerous lesions.
  • The patient's healthcare provider should discuss the benefits and limitations of each option and make a recommendation based on the individual's needs 6, 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.