What is the effectiveness of Cefpodoxime (Cefpodoxime proxetil) against Enterococcus?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Cefpodoxime is not effective against Enterococcus species and should not be used to treat Enterococcus infections. According to the most recent guidelines and evidence 1, Enterococci have intrinsic resistance to cephalosporins, including cefpodoxime, due to low-affinity penicillin-binding proteins that prevent the antibiotic from effectively disrupting cell wall synthesis.

Key Points to Consider

  • For Enterococcus infections, appropriate antibiotic choices typically include:
    • Ampicillin (2g IV every 4-6 hours for serious infections) or amoxicillin (500mg-875mg orally every 8-12 hours) for susceptible strains.
    • Vancomycin (15-20mg/kg IV every 8-12 hours) or linezolid (600mg IV/orally every 12 hours) for more serious infections or penicillin-allergic patients.
    • Combination therapy with an aminoglycoside (such as gentamicin) may be necessary for endocarditis or other severe infections to achieve synergistic killing.
  • The recommended treatment options for Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) are outlined in Table 4 of the guidelines 1, which includes linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline as potential treatment options.
  • It is essential to obtain culture and susceptibility testing to guide therapy, as Enterococcus faecium in particular often has multiple drug resistances, potentially requiring consultation with infectious disease specialists.
  • The guidelines also recommend considering cardiac surgery combined with antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infective endocarditis, and individualizing treatment duration according to infection sites, source control, underlying comorbidities, and initial response to therapy 1.

From the Research

Cefpodoxime versus Enterococcus

  • There is no direct comparison between cefpodoxime and enterococcus in the provided studies 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • However, the studies discuss the treatment of enterococcal infections, including the use of cephalosporins, such as ceftobiprole and ceftaroline, which have activity against Enterococcus faecalis 2.
  • Cefpodoxime is a third-generation cephalosporin, but its effectiveness against enterococci is not specifically mentioned in the provided studies.
  • The studies highlight the challenges of treating multidrug-resistant enterococcal infections and the need for careful consideration of treatment options, including the use of combination therapy and newer antibiotics 2, 3, 4, 5.
  • The safety and efficacy of commonly used antimicrobial agents, including cephalosporins, in the treatment of enterococcal infections are discussed, but cefpodoxime is not specifically mentioned 5.
  • First-generation oral cephalosporins, such as cephalexin and cefadroxil, are discussed as potential treatment options for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections, but their effectiveness against enterococci is not directly compared to cefpodoxime 6.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Emergence and management of drug-resistant enterococcal infections.

Expert review of anti-infective therapy, 2008

Research

Optimizing therapy for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE).

Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine, 2007

Research

A Review of Combination Antimicrobial Therapy for Enterococcus faecalis Bloodstream Infections and Infective Endocarditis.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.