How well does the tandem gait test correlate with the level of cervical myelopathy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 10, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Tandem Gait Test Shows Moderate-to-Good Correlation with Cervical Myelopathy Severity

The tandem gait test demonstrates clinically useful correlation with cervical myelopathy severity, with correlation coefficients of r=0.553 for JOA scores and r=-0.652 for Nurick scale, making it a valuable objective screening tool for gait disturbance in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). 1

Strength of Correlation

The 10-step tandem gait test shows statistically significant associations with established myelopathy severity measures:

  • JOA sub-score correlation: r = 0.553 (p < 0.001) - indicating moderate positive correlation
  • Nurick scale correlation: r = -0.652 (p < 0.001) - indicating good negative correlation (higher Nurick = worse function)
  • DCM patients completed significantly fewer consecutive steps compared to controls (7.1 ± 3.6 vs 9.9 ± 0.4 steps, p < 0.001) 1

The test also correlates with quantitative gait parameters including slower velocity, shorter strides, wider bases, and increased stance phase duration 1.

Diagnostic Performance

In a prospective diagnostic accuracy study, tandem gait assessment demonstrated:

  • Youden's Index of 40% (sensitivity + specificity - 1), which is modest but clinically useful 2
  • This places it below other physical exam findings like upper extremity reflexes (YI=54%) and manual motor testing (YI=53%), but still provides objective value 2

Clinical Context and Recommendations

Gait analysis, including tandem gait testing, is recommended as a valid and reliable functional outcome measure for assessing patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (Class II evidence, Grade B recommendation) 3. This guideline-level recommendation supports its routine clinical use.

Practical Application

The 10-step protocol provides a standardized approach:

  • Grade patients 0-5 based on number of consecutive steps and stability
  • DCM patients show distinctly different grade distributions compared to controls 1
  • The test captures gait impairment that reflects underlying spinal cord dysfunction

Important Caveats

  • Tandem gait is not specific to cervical myelopathy - abnormalities occur in cerebellar disease, vestibular disorders, peripheral neuropathies, and parkinsonism 4
  • Must be interpreted alongside other clinical findings, imaging, and disease-specific measures
  • No standardized, guideline-based protocol exists across all neurological conditions, though the 10-step version has been validated specifically for DCM 4
  • Better diagnostic utility comes from combining tandem gait with other assessments like upper extremity reflexes, manual motor testing, and patient-reported measures (mJOA, NDI) 2

The tandem gait test serves as an objective, quantifiable screening tool that correlates moderately-to-well with myelopathy severity, making it useful for both diagnosis and monitoring disease progression in DCM patients.

References

Research

How tandem gait stumbled into the neurological exam: a review.

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.