What is the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score for a patient with spontaneous eye opening, no movement to pain, and non-purposeful limb movements, who is intubated?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score for this patient would be approximately 5T, indicating severe impairment of consciousness, as the patient exhibits spontaneous eye opening without appropriate response to stimuli, absence of purposeful motor responses to pain, and is intubated, preventing assessment of verbal response. This breaks down as: Eye opening = 4 (spontaneous eye opening), Motor response = 1 (no motor response to pain, with occasional non-purposeful movements that don't count toward scoring), and Verbal response = 1T (intubated, thus unable to assess verbal response) 1. The "T" designation indicates the patient is intubated, which prevents proper assessment of the verbal component. The spontaneous eye opening without appropriate response to stimuli, combined with the absence of purposeful motor responses to pain, suggests significant brain dysfunction. Random, non-purposeful limb movements are often seen in patients with severe brain injury and don't represent meaningful responses.

When documenting, it's essential to note these specific observations rather than just the numeric score, as this provides more clinical context about the patient's neurological status and allows for better tracking of changes over time 2. The GCS remains a cornerstone in neurological assessment, providing critical insights into consciousness levels in patients with traumatic brain injuries and other neurological conditions 3, 4. However, it's crucial to consider the limitations of the GCS, particularly in intubated patients, where alternative scales like the FOUR score may offer more accurate predictions of outcome 1.

Recent studies have also explored the use of machine learning techniques to develop accurate and interpretable models for GCS prediction, which may enhance decision-making in critical care 5. Nonetheless, the GCS remains the most universally utilized level of consciousness scale worldwide, and its proper application is essential for healthcare professionals to benefit both themselves and their patients 3, 4.

References

Research

Which score should be used in intubated patients' Glasgow coma scale or full outline of unresponsiveness?

International journal of applied & basic medical research, 2015

Research

The Glasgow Coma Scale in adults: doing it right.

Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association, 2016

Research

The Glasgow coma scale.

The Journal of emergency medicine, 2000

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.