What are the classification types of a bicuspid aortic valve?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 13, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Classification of Bicuspid Aortic Valve

There are 3 main types of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV): the fused type (90-95% of cases), the 2-sinus type, and the partial-fusion type, with the fused type subdivided into three specific phenotypes based on which cusps are conjoined. 1, 2

Type 1: Fused BAV (90-95% of all BAV cases)

The fused type is characterized by 2 of the 3 cusps appearing fused or joined within 3 distinguishable aortic sinuses, creating 2 functional cusps of usually different sizes and shapes. 1

Three Phenotypes of Fused BAV:

1. Right-Left Cusp Fusion (70-80% of BAV cases)

  • Most common phenotype across all BAV variations 1
  • Commissures positioned at 10 and 4 o'clock on short-axis imaging 1
  • Associated with aortic stenosis progression, though can also present with aortic root dilatation and regurgitation (termed "root phenotype") 1
  • Strongly associated with aortic coarctation in children 1
  • More common in males 1

2. Right-Non-Coronary Cusp Fusion (20-30% of BAV cases)

  • Second most common phenotype 1
  • Commissures positioned at 1 and 7 o'clock on short-axis imaging 1
  • Associated with larger arch dimensions and ascending aorta dilatation 3
  • Higher prevalence of myxomatous mitral valve disease compared to right-left fusion 3

3. Left-Non-Coronary Cusp Fusion (3-6% of BAV cases)

  • Least common phenotype 1
  • Commissures positioned at 2 and 8 o'clock on short-axis imaging 1

Critical Features to Document in Fused BAV:

Raphe Presence:

  • A congenital fibrous ridge between fused cusps occurs in approximately 70% of fused BAV cases 1
  • Raphe presence is associated with progression to aortic stenosis and increased likelihood of future valve surgery 1
  • May not be initially visible on echocardiography but can become apparent years later 1

Valve Symmetry (Based on Non-Fused Cusp Commissural Angle):

  • Symmetrical: 160-180° angle 1, 4
  • Asymmetrical: 140-159° angle 1, 4
  • Very asymmetrical: 120-139° angle 1, 4
  • Greater asymmetry correlates with increased fusion length, decreased non-functional commissure height, and higher rates of severe aortic regurgitation 4

Type 2: Two-Sinus BAV

This type has only 2 aortic sinuses rather than the typical 3 sinuses seen in fused BAV. 2

Two Phenotypes:

  • Latero-lateral phenotype 2
  • Antero-posterior phenotype 2

Type 3: Partial-Fusion (Forme Fruste) BAV

This represents an incomplete fusion pattern and is the rarest type. 2

Clinical Implications by Phenotype

Imaging Characteristics:

  • All fused BAV types demonstrate oval ("American football shape") systolic opening on short-axis views, contrasting with the triangular opening of tricuspid valves 1
  • The non-fused cusp typically shows eccentric dominance with compensatory enlargement compared to the fused cusps 1

Surgical Considerations:

  • Acquired fusion from calcification or rheumatic disease can mimic congenital BAV 1
  • Intraoperative differentiation: congenital fusion shows lower pseudocommissure attachment, obtuse angle between fused cusps, and absent cleavage plane on ventricular aspect 1

Common Pitfall: Do not confuse acquired tricuspid valve fusion from calcification with congenital BAV—surgical inspection or pathological examination may be required for definitive diagnosis when imaging is equivocal. 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.