What are the grades in the Hunt and Hess classification for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 13, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Hunt and Hess Grading Scale for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

The Hunt and Hess (HH) grading scale divides patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage into 5 progressively severe grades based on clinical presentation, and is recommended by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association for determining initial clinical severity and predicting outcomes. 1

The Five Hunt and Hess Grades

The HH scale stratifies patients into the following categories of increasing severity 2:

  • Grade I: Asymptomatic or minimal headache with slight nuchal rigidity
  • Grade II: Moderate to severe headache, nuchal rigidity, but no neurological deficit other than cranial nerve palsy
  • Grade III: Drowsiness, confusion, or mild focal neurological deficit
  • Grade IV: Stupor, moderate to severe hemiparesis, possible early decerebrate rigidity and vegetative disturbances
  • Grade V: Deep coma, decerebrate rigidity, moribund appearance

Clinical Significance and Prognostic Value

The HH grade directly correlates with patient outcomes and guides treatment decisions. 1 The scale effectively separates patients into low-grade (I-II) and high-grade (III-V) categories, with dramatically different prognoses 2, 3.

Outcome Expectations by Grade

  • Low-grade patients (HH I-II): Approximately 60-70% achieve good physical outcomes without severe cognitive dysfunction when treated appropriately 4
  • High-grade patients (HH IV-V): Only 39-40% achieve favorable outcomes at 12 months even with treatment 1, though outcomes improve significantly if patients show neurological improvement by 48 hours 5

Treatment Implications

The HH grade influences surgical timing and approach 2, 6:

  • HH I-II patients: Benefit from early surgery (within 72 hours) 6
  • HH III-V patients: Historically achieved better results with delayed surgery, though modern management in specialized neurological ICUs has improved outcomes with early aneurysm securing 1

Important Clinical Caveats

Delayed reassessment at 48 hours post-admission significantly improves prognostication, particularly for HH grade V patients. 5 Initial moribund examination does not always predict final outcome—patients who improve from HH V to HH IV or lower by 48 hours have substantially better survival rates 5.

The presence of intracerebral hemorrhage on imaging dramatically worsens prognosis regardless of initial HH grade. 7 All patients with middle cerebral artery aneurysms and intracerebral hematoma in one series either died or remained vegetative despite surgical intervention 7.

Age significantly modifies outcomes within each HH grade. 1 While 82% of younger patients achieved functional independence at 6 years, only 42% of patients >65 years reached this milestone, though treatment remains reasonable in elderly patients after appropriate discussion 1.

Related Questions

What is the recommended acute management for a patient with a saccular aneurysm causing an acute subarachnoid hemorrhage?
In a 61-year-old patient with Hunt-Hess grade 4, Fisher grade 4 subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypertension and congestive heart failure, and a small blister aneurysm arising from a distal basilar artery perforator, what are the management and treatment options?
What are the grades of the Hunt and Hess scale for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and the associated management and prognosis?
What are the Hunt and Hess scale and the modified Fischer scale used for in assessing subarachnoid hemorrhage?
What is the recommended management for a patient with a small stable subarachnoid hemorrhage who is on long‑term anticoagulation?
What is the most likely cause of a filling defect in the torcula (confluence of sinuses) and transverse sinus after head trauma?
What is the appropriate management of an ibuprofen overdose?
What is the recommended first‑line treatment for primary open‑angle glaucoma and the subsequent medication options if target intra‑ocular pressure is not achieved?
What is the House‑Brackmann grading system for facial nerve weakness?
What are the recommended dosing regimens and safety considerations for mebendazole in treating ascariasis, hookworm, Trichuris trichiura, and Enterobius vermicularis?
What is the recommended dosing, titration, monitoring, and weaning protocol for a dopamine infusion in an ICU patient with hypotension or low cardiac output unresponsive to fluid resuscitation?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.