A Soft Achilles Tendon After Injury Indicates Complete Rupture
A soft or floppy Achilles tendon after injury is a cardinal sign of complete Achilles tendon rupture and should prompt immediate clinical confirmation using the Thompson test, assessment for a palpable gap, and evaluation of decreased plantar flexion strength. 1
Diagnostic Approach
The diagnosis of acute Achilles tendon rupture is primarily clinical and should be established using one or more of the following physical examination findings: 1
- Thompson test (Simonds squeeze test) – Absence of plantar flexion when squeezing the calf indicates rupture 1
- Palpable gap or defect – A soft, floppy tendon with loss of normal contour is pathognomonic for complete rupture 1
- Decreased ankle plantar flexion strength – Marked weakness compared to the contralateral side 1
- Increased passive ankle dorsiflexion – The Matles test demonstrates excessive dorsiflexion with gentle manipulation 1
Imaging Considerations
- MRI and ultrasound are NOT routinely required to confirm the diagnosis of acute Achilles tendon rupture when clinical findings are clear 1
- Imaging may be helpful for preoperative planning or when the diagnosis is uncertain, particularly to assess the size of the gap and quality of remaining tendon 2
- MRI is the gold standard if imaging is pursued, with approximately 95% sensitivity and specificity 3
Management Decision: Surgical vs. Nonsurgical
Both surgical and nonsurgical treatment are viable options for acute Achilles tendon rupture, with the choice depending on patient activity level, compliance expectations, and risk tolerance. 1, 4
Surgical Treatment
Surgery reduces rerupture rates (2.3% vs. 3.9% nonsurgical) and enables faster return to work (19 days earlier on average), making it preferable for younger, high-demand patients. 4
Surgical Advantages:
- Lower rerupture risk – Relative risk 0.43 (95% CI 0.31-0.60) compared to nonsurgical management 4
- Faster return to work and sports – Average return to sports at 24 weeks (6 months) 5
- Better early functional recovery – 18% greater strength recovery at 18 months 4
Surgical Risks:
- Wound infection – Open repair carries ~6% risk of superficial infection 5, 4
- Sural nerve injury – 1.4-2.8% with open repair, higher (3.2-5.2%) with percutaneous techniques 5, 4
- Deep vein thrombosis – Approximately 1% incidence 5
- Overall complication rate – Relative risk 2.76 (95% CI 1.84-4.13) compared to nonsurgical 4
Nonsurgical Treatment
Nonsurgical treatment with functional bracing is an acceptable option for patients with lower functional demands or medical comorbidities, provided strict compliance with immobilization protocols can be ensured. 1, 4
Nonsurgical Protocol:
- Functional bracing is superior to plaster casting – The UKSTAR trial (n=527) demonstrated no significant differences in outcomes between functional bracing and casting 4
- Higher rerupture risk – 3.9% vs. 2.3% with surgery, primarily related to patient noncompliance 4
- Comparable long-term functional outcomes – At 2 years, functional deficits persist regardless of treatment method 6
Critical Management Pitfalls
Patient Compliance is Paramount
Noncompliance with postoperative or immobilization protocols is the primary modifiable risk factor for rerupture. 5 Both patients who reruptured in early weight-bearing studies had documented noncompliance and falls during the first 4 weeks. 1
Early Mobilization Protocols
For surgical patients, early protected weight-bearing (≤2 weeks postoperatively) with dorsiflexion restriction accelerates return to activities without increasing rerupture risk. 1, 5 The key is maintaining dorsiflexion protection beyond neutral for the first 4-6 weeks. 5
Chronic Rupture Risk
Delayed diagnosis beyond 4-6 weeks converts an acute rupture to a chronic rupture, which requires more complex reconstruction and has higher infection rates and more prolonged recovery. 2 A soft tendon should therefore prompt urgent evaluation and treatment planning.
Long-Term Expectations
Major functional deficits persist at 2 years regardless of treatment method, with only minor improvements occurring between 1 and 2 years post-injury. 6 Patients should be counseled that physical activity levels often remain reduced compared to pre-injury status, even though patient-reported outcomes may be relatively high (ATRS scores 89-90). 6