Causes of Anion Gap Abnormalities
Elevated Anion Gap
An elevated anion gap (>12 mmol/L) indicates high anion gap metabolic acidosis and requires immediate evaluation for life-threatening conditions including diabetic ketoacidosis, lactic acidosis, toxic ingestions, and uremic acidosis. 1, 2, 1
Common Causes of Elevated Anion Gap
The primary causes of elevated anion gap metabolic acidosis can be systematically approached using clinical context and specific laboratory findings:
Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
- Anion gap >10 mmol/L in mild DKA, >12 mmol/L in moderate-to-severe DKA 1
- Accompanied by hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL), positive ketones, and arterial pH <7.3 1, 2
- Serum bicarbonate <15 mEq/L with variable effective serum osmolality 1
Toxic Ingestions
- Salicylate, methanol, ethylene glycol, and paraldehyde poisoning produce high anion gap acidosis 1, 2
- Ethylene glycol suggested by calcium oxalate and hippurate crystals in urine 1
- For ethylene glycol poisoning with anion gap >27 mmol/L, extracorporeal treatment is recommended; for anion gap 23-27 mmol/L, it is suggested 3
- Paraldehyde identified by characteristic strong odor on breath 1
- These low-molecular weight compounds produce both osmolar gap and anion gap acidosis 1
Lactic Acidosis
- Results from decreased oxygen delivery or defective oxygen utilization 4
- Associated with high mortality and requires measurement of blood lactate 1
- Metformin use should be sought in clinical history 1
Chronic Renal Failure
- Produces mild acidosis from decreased ammonia secretion and retention of unmeasured anions 4
- More typically presents as hyperchloremic acidosis rather than high anion gap acidosis 1, 2
- Common cause of increased anion gap in hospitalized patients 5, 6
Other Common Causes in Hospitalized Patients
- Hypertensive disease, malignant neoplasms, heart disease, and diabetes mellitus 5
- Congestive heart failure 6
Clinical Significance of Anion Gap Values
Mean and range of increased anion gap: 16 mmol/L (central 90% range: 13-20 mmol/L) with modern ion-selective electrode methods 5
- Anion gap >24 mmol/L is rare and strongly suggests metabolic acidosis or laboratory error 5
- Values exceeding 30 mmol/L are uncommon and warrant verification 6
- Albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG) >24.54 predicts secondary acute myocardial injury in acute poisoning cases 7
Low Anion Gap
A low anion gap (<3 mmol/L with modern methods) should prompt evaluation for hypoalbuminemia, paraproteinemia (multiple myeloma), laboratory error, or bromide intoxication. 5, 8, 9
Common Causes of Low Anion Gap
Hypoalbuminemia
- Most common cause of decreased anion gap 6, 8
- Associated with nephrotic syndrome, liver cirrhosis, intestinal obstruction, and severe hemorrhage 5, 6
- Results from loss of negatively charged albumin, reducing unmeasured anions 6, 8
- However, not all hypoalbuminemic patients have decreased anion gap 6
Paraproteinemia
- IgG multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy produce low anion gap from unmeasured cation contribution by paraprotein 5, 10, 8
- Diffuse polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia (>3 g/dL) also significantly lowers anion gap 10
- Mean anion gap of 8.7 mEq/L in patients with immunoglobulin >4 g/dL versus 11.9 mEq/L in controls 10
- Independent of specific immunoglobulin class contribution 10
Laboratory Error and Specimen Issues
- High incidence of anion gap <2 mmol/L should trigger quality control review 5, 11
- Specimen contamination or interference 11
- Negative anion gap values (-1 or less) are rare and warrant investigation 11
Other Causes
Clinical Significance
Mean and range of decreased anion gap: 3 mmol/L (central 90% range: 2-4 mmol/L) 5
- Values <2 mmol/L are rare (incidence 2.9% among hospitalized patients) 5, 6
- Baseline low anion gap may mask identification of concurrent high anion gap metabolic acidosis 8, 9
- Can provide valuable diagnostic clues for life-threatening intoxications or occult neoplasms 8, 9
Important Pitfall
The reference range for anion gap has decreased from 8-16 mmol/L to 3-11 mmol/L (or 5-12 mmol/L) due to ion-selective electrode methodology, but many clinicians still use outdated reference values, leading to misinterpretation 5, 8