What is the modified Bishop score, how is it calculated, and what score indicates a favorable cervix for successful induction of labor?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 17, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Modified Bishop Score

The modified Bishop score is a cervical assessment tool that adds 2 points to the original Bishop score for multiparous women with a prior vaginal delivery, and a score of less than 5 indicates an unfavorable cervix requiring cervical ripening before labor induction. 1

Definition and Calculation

The modified Bishop score builds upon the original Bishop scoring system by incorporating parity as a predictive factor for successful labor induction 2:

  • For nulliparous women: The modified Bishop score equals the standard Bishop score (0 points added)
  • For multiparous women with prior vaginal delivery: Add 2 points to the standard Bishop score 2

The standard Bishop score components assess five cervical and fetal parameters (dilation, effacement, station, consistency, and position), with scores ranging from 0-13 3.

Clinical Significance for Cervical Favorability

An unfavorable cervix is defined as a modified Bishop score <5, which necessitates the use of cervical ripening agents before proceeding with labor induction. 1

This threshold is clinically important because:

  • In the landmark ARRIVE trial, 63% of enrolled women had an unfavorable cervix (modified Bishop score <5) at randomization, and cervical ripening was specifically requested for these patients 1
  • The modified Bishop score ≥6 is independently associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), with an odds ratio of 2.07 (95% CI 1.28-3.35) 4

Predictive Value for Successful Induction

The modified Bishop score demonstrates superior predictive accuracy compared to the standard Bishop score, particularly when parity is incorporated 2, 5:

  • Scores including parity (such as the simplified Bishop including parity, Hughey, and Levine scores) achieve the highest area under the curve (AUC 0.68-0.70) for predicting successful labor induction, even in women with very unfavorable cervices 5
  • For labor induction with intravenous oxytocin, a modified Bishop score of 6 serves as a practical cutoff for predicting success 6
  • The cesarean delivery rate for failed induction is significantly higher in nulliparous women compared to multiparous women at equivalent modified Bishop scores of 7-9 2

Clinical Application Caveats

Parity is a critical independent predictor of induction success that must be factored into clinical decision-making. 2, 5 The addition of 2 points for multiparity does not artificially inflate success rates or increase cesarean risk when the modified Bishop score ranges from 7-9 2.

When comparing assessment methods, transvaginal sonography for cervical length measurement (cutoff 2.5 cm) demonstrates higher sensitivity (61.8%) than modified Bishop score (28.9%) for predicting successful induction, though both methods maintain excellent specificity 6.

References

Research

[Adding parity to the Bishop score for term labor induction: a retrospective study].

Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction, 2012

Research

[Original Bishop score with modifications].

Ceska gynekologie, 2016

Research

Prediction of successful labor induction with very unfavorable cervix: A comparison of six scores.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.