Is there a stage IVC in the FIGO 2023 ovarian cancer staging system, and what does it represent?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 20, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Stage IVC Does Not Exist in the Current FIGO Ovarian Cancer Staging System

There is no stage IVC in the FIGO 2023 staging system for epithelial ovarian cancer—stage IV is divided only into stages IVA and IVB. 1

FIGO Stage IV Classification

The current FIGO staging system for ovarian cancer divides stage IV disease into two distinct categories based on the location and type of distant metastases:

Stage IVA

  • Pleural effusion with positive cytology 1
  • This represents malignant cells documented in pleural fluid

Stage IVB

  • Parenchymal metastases (invasion into solid organs like liver or spleen tissue, not just surface involvement) 1
  • Metastases to extra-abdominal organs 1
  • Inguinal lymph nodes 1
  • Lymph nodes outside the abdominal cavity 1

Important Distinction from Stage III

Stage IIIC includes extension of tumor to the capsule of liver and spleen without parenchymal involvement, whereas stage IVB requires actual invasion into the organ parenchyma. 1 This distinction is critical for accurate staging and has prognostic implications.

Clinical Implications of the Two-Stage Division

The division of stage IV into only IVA and IVB (not IVC) reflects distinct prognostic groups, though research shows conflicting data about which substage has worse outcomes:

  • One multicenter study (2023) found stage IVA patients had worse prognosis than IVB, with median overall survival of 31 months versus 45 months (p=0.02), suggesting pleural involvement may be particularly aggressive. 2

  • Conversely, the EORTC 55971 trial analysis (2018) found stage IVB patients had better overall survival (31 months) compared to IVA (24 months, p=0.044), and IVB patients appeared to benefit more from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 3

These contradictory findings highlight ongoing debate about the prognostic value of the IVA/IVB subdivision, but the staging system remains limited to these two categories without further subdivision. 2, 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.