What is the current definition of Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The current definition of Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) is a fasting plasma glucose level of 100 mg/dL to 125 mg/dL [ 1 ].

Key Points

  • This intermediate category falls between normoglycemia, defined as a fasting plasma glucose level of less than 100 mg/dL, and diabetes, defined as a fasting plasma glucose level of 126 mg/dL or higher [ 1 ].
  • The diagnosis of IFG is based on a single fasting plasma glucose measurement, and no specific medication or treatment duration is required for diagnosis, although lifestyle modifications and monitoring are typically recommended.
  • It is worth noting that the World Health Organization and numerous other diabetes organizations define the IFG lower limit at 110 mg/dL [ 1 ].

Diagnosis and Recommendations

  • The diagnosis of IFG is straightforward and relies on a simple blood test to measure fasting plasma glucose levels [ 1 ].
  • Individuals with IFG are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and therefore, lifestyle modifications such as dietary changes and increased physical activity are often recommended to prevent or delay the onset of these conditions [ 1 ].

From the Research

Definition of Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG)

  • The current definition of Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) is a fasting plasma glucose level of 100 to 125 mg/dL (5.6 to 6.9 mmol/L) 2.
  • This definition has been supported by various studies, including one that found that a fasting plasma glucose level of ≥100 mg/dL is associated with an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes 3.
  • However, some studies have suggested that the optimal cut-off for IFG may be higher, such as ≥102 mg/dL 3.
  • The International Diabetes Federation has also suggested that the 1-hour post-load plasma glucose level may be a useful diagnostic tool for identifying individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes 4.

Pathophysiology of IFG

  • IFG and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) share similar underlying pathophysiologies, including insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome 5.
  • Factor analysis has shown that the risk factors for IFG and IGT, such as waist-to-hip ratio, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, are grouped into similar dimensions 5.
  • This suggests that IFG and IGT may be part of a continuum of glucose intolerance, rather than distinct entities 6.

Diagnosis and Intervention

  • The diagnosis of IFG is typically made using a fasting plasma glucose test 2.
  • Individuals with IFG are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and may benefit from lifestyle interventions such as weight loss and increased physical activity 6.
  • Medications such as metformin and acarbose may also be effective in preventing or delaying the onset of type 2 diabetes in individuals with IFG 2, 6.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose.

American family physician, 2004

Research

Fasting plasma glucose and Type 2 diabetes risk: a non-linear relationship.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2010

Research

Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycaemia: the current status on definition and intervention.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2002

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.