What is the risk of fetal injury with manual vaginal replacement and elevation of an impacted fetal head?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Manual vaginal replacement elevation of an impacted fetal head during cesarean delivery carries significant risks of fetal injury, including skull fractures, intracranial hemorrhage, and cervical spine injuries, and should be performed with caution and careful consideration of alternative approaches. The primary risks associated with this procedure occur due to excessive pressure applied to the fetal head during manipulation, especially when the head is deeply wedged in the maternal pelvis 1. The risk increases with the degree of impaction, prolonged second stage of labor, and when excessive force is applied during the maneuver. To minimize these risks, gentle upward pressure should be applied with the flat of the hand rather than fingertips, and the pressure should be distributed evenly across the fetal skull.

Some of the key considerations and techniques to prevent or manage an impacted fetal head include:

  • Manual vaginal disimpaction (vaginal push method), which involves introducing a hand into the vagina to move the fetal head up into the abdomen before making a uterine incision 1
  • Use of specialized devices like the Fetal Pillow, an inflatable device used in the vagina to move the fetal head up into the abdomen before making a uterine incision 1
  • The Patwardhan method, a modification of the reverse breech extraction, which requires specialist training and is widely used in some regions but less familiar in others 1
  • Reverse breech extraction (head-last delivery), which may distribute forces more evenly across the fetal body rather than concentrating them on the head, and is considered in cases of severe impaction 1

It is crucial to approach each case with careful consideration of the most appropriate technique to minimize the risk of fetal injury, taking into account the degree of impaction, the skill level of the practitioner, and the availability of specialized devices or assistance. The execution of these techniques is highly variable in clinical practice, and incorrect application of pressure can increase the risk of fetal injury, making it essential to prioritize gentle and skilled manipulation 1.

From the Research

Risk of Fetal Injury with Manual Vaginal Replacement Elevation of Impacted Fetal Head

  • The risk of fetal injury with manual vaginal replacement elevation of impacted fetal head is a concern in obstetric care 2.
  • A prospective observational study found that 13 babies (2%) died or sustained severe injury out of 3518 second-stage Caesarean births reported, with 564 (16%) of these requiring a dis-impaction technique or experiencing 'difficulty' in delivering the head 2.
  • The study also found that manual elevation of the head by an assistant through the vagina was one of the most common dis-impaction techniques used, with 235 cases reported 2.
  • However, the evidence base for the safety and efficacy of different techniques for managing impacted fetal head is limited, with low or very low certainty of evidence for most outcomes 3.
  • Another study found that the use of instruments, such as forceps or vacuum, at the time of elective repeat cesarean delivery, appears to be safe and effective, but did not specifically address manual vaginal replacement elevation of impacted fetal head 4.

Comparison of Techniques

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis compared different techniques for preventing or managing impacted fetal head at cesarean birth, including vaginal disimpaction, reverse breech extraction, the Patwardhan method, and the Fetal Pillow 3.
  • The review found that the certainty of evidence was low or very low for all outcomes, and that pooled analysis mostly showed no or equivocal differences in outcomes across comparisons of techniques 3.
  • However, some maternal outcomes suggested differences between techniques, such as a higher risk of uterine incision extension with vaginal disimpaction compared to reverse breech extraction 3.

Limitations of Evidence

  • The current evidence base for managing impacted fetal head is limited, with a need for high-quality studies to inform practice 3, 2.
  • The use of manual vaginal replacement elevation of impacted fetal head is not well-studied, and more research is needed to determine its safety and efficacy 2.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Impacted fetal head during second stage Caesarean birth: A prospective observational study.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.