What is the most appropriate next diagnostic test for a 43-year-old man with gross hematuria (presence of blood in the urine), normal renal function (Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Creatinine within normal limits), and a normal Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) urogram of the kidneys?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The most appropriate diagnostic test to perform next is A. Cystoscopy. This patient presents with a single episode of gross hematuria with microscopic confirmation (10-15 erythrocytes/hpf) but has a normal CT urogram. Cystoscopy is indicated to evaluate the bladder and urethra for potential sources of bleeding that may not be visible on CT imaging, such as bladder tumors, vascular lesions, or inflammatory changes. The patient's normal protein-creatinine ratio and absence of proteinuria on urinalysis make glomerular causes less likely, so kidney biopsy (option B) would be premature. A repeat urinalysis (option C) would not provide additional diagnostic information at this point since hematuria has already been confirmed. The 24-hour urine protein measurement (option D) is unnecessary given the already normal random urine protein-creatinine ratio. In a 43-year-old man with gross hematuria, ruling out urological malignancy is a priority, making cystoscopy the appropriate next step in evaluation, as supported by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria for hematuria 1 and the American College of Physicians' advice for high-value care in evaluating hematuria 1. Given the potential for malignancy, especially in patients over 40 years old, cystoscopy is a crucial diagnostic step, as emphasized by the American Urological Association's best practice policy recommendations for asymptomatic microscopic hematuria 1.

From the Research

Diagnostic Approach

The patient presents with gross hematuria, which is a significant symptom that requires further evaluation. Given the patient's age and lack of risk factors, the most appropriate next step is to investigate the cause of the hematuria.

Considerations for Diagnostic Tests

  • The patient has already undergone a contrast-enhanced CT urogram, which showed no stones, masses, or cysts.
  • The urinalysis results show 10-15 erythrocytes/hpf, indicating microscopic hematuria.
  • The random urine protein-creatinine ratio is 20 mg/g, which is within normal limits.

Appropriate Diagnostic Test

Based on the studies, cystoscopy is the most appropriate diagnostic test to perform next.

  • According to 2, cystoscopy is recommended for adults 35 years and older with gross hematuria.
  • Study 3 states that cystoscopic examination remains the gold standard technique for initial diagnosis of bladder cancer.
  • Study 4 found that bladder cancer was an uncommon finding on cystoscopy among patients being evaluated for asymptomatic microscopic hematuria, but it is still an important diagnostic tool.

Rationale for Choosing Cystoscopy

  • Cystoscopy allows for direct visualization of the bladder and urethra, which can help identify any abnormalities or lesions that may be causing the hematuria.
  • The patient's age and lack of risk factors do not rule out the possibility of bladder cancer or other conditions that may require cystoscopy for diagnosis.

The most appropriate answer is: A Cystoscopy

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Bladder Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment.

American family physician, 2017

Research

Diagnosis and Staging of Bladder Cancer.

Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.