What are the sensitivity and specificity of Previcity (Predictive Analytics) for Alzheimer's disease detection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Previcity, a blood test for Alzheimer's disease detection, demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity, with approximately 92% sensitivity and 84% specificity, as reported in recent clinical studies 1.

Key Findings

  • The test measures specific blood biomarkers, including amyloid-beta 42/40 ratio and phosphorylated tau (p-tau217), which are indicators of Alzheimer's pathology.
  • Previcity represents a significant advancement over traditional diagnostic methods, being less invasive than lumbar punctures for CSF analysis and more accessible than PET scans.
  • The Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer’s Disease recommends that blood biomarker tests for amyloid pathology should have a sensitivity of ≥90% and a specificity of ≥85% for use as a triaging test in primary care 1.

Clinical Implications

  • Previcity is particularly valuable for early detection of Alzheimer's disease, even before symptoms become apparent, allowing for earlier intervention and treatment planning.
  • However, it's essential to note that while Previcity offers strong diagnostic performance, it should be used as part of a comprehensive clinical assessment rather than as a standalone diagnostic tool, and results should be interpreted by healthcare providers with expertise in cognitive disorders.
  • The emergence of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for AD is expected to transform the diagnosis and management of people with cognitive impairment, and biomarker confirmation of amyloid pathology is required before their initiation 1.

Recommendations

  • Previcity should be considered as a diagnostic tool for Alzheimer's disease detection, given its high sensitivity and specificity, and its potential to enable earlier intervention and treatment planning.
  • Healthcare providers should interpret Previcity results in the complete clinical context, taking into account the pre-test probability of amyloid pathology and the potential for co-pathologies 1.

From the Research

Sensitivity and Specificity of Previcity for Alzheimer Detection

  • There are no research papers provided that directly discuss the sensitivity and specificity of Previcity for Alzheimer detection.
  • The provided studies focus on the use of lumbar puncture, cerebrospinal fluid testing, MRI, CT, SPECT, and PET imaging in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • These studies discuss the safety, tolerability, and appropriate use of these diagnostic tools, but do not mention Previcity or its sensitivity and specificity for Alzheimer detection.
  • Therefore, it is not possible to provide information on the sensitivity and specificity of Previcity for Alzheimer detection based on the provided evidence.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Safety and tolerability of lumbar puncture for the evaluation of Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023

Research

SPECT and PET imaging in Alzheimer's disease.

Annals of nuclear medicine, 2018

Research

Appropriate use criteria for lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid testing in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.