What margins are necessary for excising squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from the face?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) excision margins from the face should be at least 4-6 mm.

Key Considerations

  • For clinically well-defined, low-risk tumors less than 2 cm in diameter, a minimum 4-mm margin is appropriate 1.
  • Larger tumors, high-risk tumors, or those in high-risk locations (such as the ear, lip, scalp, eyelids, or nose) should be removed with a wider margin (6 mm or more) 1.
  • Mohs' micrographic surgery can be used to excise the tumor with minimal loss of normal tissue, especially in high-risk locations or when preserving tissue is crucial 1.
  • The choice of margin width depends on the tumor's size, location, and risk factors, as well as the patient's overall health and preferences 1.

Rationale

The concept of a surgical margin is based on the assumption that the clinically visible margin of the tumor bears a predictable relationship to the true extent of the tumor 1. A wider surgical margin increases the likelihood of removing all tumor tissue. However, in some cases, such as in patients with epidermolysis bullosa, a more aggressive surgical approach may be necessary to reduce recurrence risk 1.

From the Research

Surgical Margins for Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) on the Face

  • The necessary margins for excising SCC from the face are not universally agreed upon, but several studies provide guidance on this issue 2, 3, 4.
  • A study published in the Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery found that a microscopic clear margin diameter (mCMD) of >4.1 mm was associated with no local recurrences (LR) in patients with facial cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) 2.
  • Another study published in the Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery found that national guidelines for operative radial margins predict 95% oncological clearance with a margin of 4 mm for low-risk and 6 mm for high-risk tumours 3.
  • A retrospective study published in The New Zealand medical journal found that increased odds of positive margin on surgical excision were associated with increased tumour thickness, tumours from the head and neck, and those excised in primary care 4.

Factors Influencing Margin Status

  • Tumour thickness, location, and excision in primary care are factors that can influence the likelihood of positive or close margins in SCC excisions 4.
  • A study published in the Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology found that guideline recommendations for surgical excision margins vary among different types of nonmelanoma skin cancers, including basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, and Merkel cell carcinoma 5.

Recommendations for Surgical Margins

  • The current evidence suggests that a surgical margin of at least 4-6 mm is recommended for excising SCC from the face, depending on the tumour's risk classification and location 2, 3.
  • However, the optimal margin size may vary depending on the individual case, and further research is needed to determine the most effective and evidence-based approach to surgical excision for SCC 5.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Facial cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma - microscopic safety margins and their impact on developing local recurrences.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 2020

Research

A Review of the Global Guidelines on Surgical Margins for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers.

The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.