What is the diagnosis for a patient with a normal tricuspid valve (tricuspid valve) structure, trivial tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and no stenosis, as well as a normal pulmonic valve structure with no stenosis or regurgitation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The patient's echocardiogram findings indicate normal tricuspid and pulmonic valve function, with no evidence of significant tricuspid regurgitation or stenosis, and therefore, no intervention is required at this time. The tricuspid valve has trivial regurgitation, which is a common and benign finding in most people, as noted in the guidelines by 1. There is no evidence of tricuspid stenosis, and the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter is normal at 1.3 cm. The right atrial pressure is estimated at 3 mmHg, which is within normal limits, and the tricuspid regurgitation velocity is 1.2 m/s, indicating normal right ventricular systolic pressure.

The pulmonic valve appears structurally normal with no stenosis or regurgitation, and the peak velocity across the pulmonic valve is 1.0 m/s with a peak gradient of 4 mmHg and mean gradient of 2 mmHg, all of which are within normal range, as supported by the guidelines outlined in 1. These findings suggest normal right heart hemodynamics with no evidence of pulmonary hypertension or right-sided valvular disease. According to the guidelines by 1, the patient does not meet the criteria for intervention, as they do not have severe tricuspid regurgitation or stenosis, and their symptoms and hemodynamic parameters are within normal limits.

Some key points to consider in the management of tricuspid valve disease, as outlined in the guidelines by 1 and 1, include:

  • The importance of assessing the severity of tricuspid regurgitation and stenosis
  • The role of symptoms, such as fatigue, palpitations, and dyspnea, in determining the need for intervention
  • The use of echocardiography to evaluate tricuspid valve function and estimate pulmonary artery systolic pressure
  • The consideration of intervention, such as surgery or percutaneous techniques, in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation or stenosis, as recommended by 1. However, in this case, no specific intervention is needed based on these normal findings, and the patient can be managed conservatively, with ongoing monitoring of their symptoms and valve function, as supported by the guidelines outlined in 1.

From the Research

Tricuspid Valve Assessment

  • The tricuspid valve structure is reported as normal with trivial regurgitation and a TR velocity of 1.2 m/s 2, 3.
  • The TR gradient is >50%, indicating potential tricuspid regurgitation, but the provided velocity and gradient values do not exceed the normal range 4.
  • The IVC calibre is 1.3 cm, and the RVSP is not explicitly stated, but the RA pressure is 3mmHg, which is within normal limits.

Pulmonic Valve Evaluation

  • The pulmonic valve structure is normal, with no stenosis or regurgitation reported 2, 3.
  • The peak velocity is 1.0 m/s, and the peak gradient is 4 mmHg, which are within normal limits.
  • The mean velocity and mean gradient are 0.8 m/s and 2 mmHg, respectively, also indicating no significant pulmonic valve disease.

Clinical Implications

  • Tricuspid regurgitation can be classified into primary and secondary types, with secondary TR being more common and often caused by tricuspid annular dilatation, right heart failure, and/or pulmonary hypertension 3.
  • Echocardiography is a crucial tool for assessing TR severity and mechanisms, as well as estimating pulmonary pressure and characterizing LV disease 2, 3.
  • The management of TR includes medical therapy, such as diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and aldosterone antagonists, as well as surgical or transcatheter interventions in selected patients 2, 3.

Related Questions

What is the diagnosis for a patient with a normal tricuspid valve (tricuspid valve) structure, trivial tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and no stenosis, as well as a normal pulmonic valve structure with no stenosis or regurgitation?
What is the diagnosis for a patient with a normal tricuspid valve (TV) structure, trivial tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and no stenosis, as well as a normal pulmonic valve (PV) structure with no stenosis or regurgitation?
What is the diagnosis for a patient with a tricuspid valve (TV) showing trivial regurgitation, normal structure, and a tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity of 1.2 meters per second (m/s)?
What is the clinical significance of a normal tricuspid valve structure, with respiratory variation greater than 50%, no stenosis, trivial regurgitation, a tricuspid velocity of 1.2 meters per second (m/s), normal right atrium pressure, and a normal inferior vena cava (IVC) caliber?
What is the clinical significance of a normal tricuspid valve structure with trivial regurgitation, as evidenced by a tricuspid regurgitation (TR) gradient variation greater than 50% with respiration, no stenosis, normal inferior vena cava (IVC) calibre, trivial right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) regurgitation, normal right atrial pressure, and a tricuspid regurgitation velocity of 1.2 meters per second (m/s)?
What is the equivalent dose of pantoprazole (Proton Pump Inhibitor) for a patient taking 20mg of esomeprazole (Nexium)?
What are the methods to confirm or rule out a leukemoid reaction?
What are the causes of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) in pregnancy?
What is the diagnosis for a patient with a normal tricuspid valve (tricuspid valve) structure, trivial tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and no stenosis, as well as a normal pulmonic valve structure with no stenosis or regurgitation?
What are the implications of a normal tricuspid valve structure with trivial regurgitation, no stenosis, and a normal right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) on cardiac function?
What is the appropriate management for a 32-year-old female presenting with menorrhagia (excessive menstrual bleeding), reporting heavy menstrual flow for 3 days, using 8 tampons per day, and requesting the Depo (medroxyprogesterone acetate) injection, with a history of using her husband's semaglutide (semaglutide) and denying a family history of medullary thyroid cancer or pancreatitis?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.