Can you provide a skin physical examination template for evaluating pigmented lesions (moles) that I can copy and paste into an electronic health record (EHR)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 11, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Skin Physical Examination Template for Mole Evaluation

Use the ABCD criteria systematically when documenting pigmented lesions, as this framework is guideline-recommended for identifying suspicious lesions that require excision or urgent referral 1, 2, 1.


SKIN EXAMINATION - PIGMENTED LESION EVALUATION

Patient History:

  • Duration of lesion: ___________
  • Recent changes: □ Size □ Color □ Shape □ None
  • Symptoms: □ Itching □ Bleeding □ None
  • Personal history of melanoma: □ Yes □ No
  • Family history of melanoma: □ Yes □ No
  • Sun exposure history: □ Frequent sunburns □ Tanning bed use □ Occupational exposure

Risk Factors Present:

  • □ Fair skin/photosensitivity
  • □ Red or blond hair
  • □ Freckling
  • □ >20 nevi on arms
  • □ Atypical/dysplastic nevi
  • □ Giant congenital nevi

LESION DOCUMENTATION:

Location: ___________

Size: Maximum diameter _____ mm

Elevation: □ Flat □ Palpable □ Nodular


ABCD ASSESSMENT 1, 2:

A - ASYMMETRY: □ Symmetric □ Asymmetric (one half unlike the other)

B - BORDER: □ Regular, well-defined □ Irregular, poorly defined, notched

C - COLOR: □ Uniform (single color) □ Heterogeneous (multiple colors - specify: □ tan □ brown □ black □ red □ white □ blue) □ ≥3 colors present

D - DIAMETER: □ <5 mm □ ≥5 mm □ ≥10 mm

E - EVOLUTION/DYNAMICS 1, 2: □ Stable □ Changing (size, color, elevation, or symptoms)


"UGLY DUCKLING" ASSESSMENT 1: □ Lesion resembles other nevi on patient □ Lesion does NOT fit patient's nevus pattern (concerning)


ADDITIONAL FEATURES:

  • Ulceration: □ Present □ Absent
  • Regression: □ Present □ Absent
  • Satellitosis: □ Present □ Absent

DERMOSCOPY PERFORMED: □ Yes □ No (If yes, describe findings): ___________


REGIONAL LYMPH NODES:

  • Cervical: □ Normal □ Enlarged
  • Axillary: □ Normal □ Enlarged
  • Inguinal: □ Normal □ Enlarged

Complete skin examination performed: □ Yes □ No Additional suspicious lesions identified: □ Yes □ No


CLINICAL IMPRESSION: □ Benign-appearing nevus □ Atypical/dysplastic nevus □ Suspicious for melanoma □ Other: ___________

PLAN: □ Reassurance, routine follow-up □ Photographic monitoring □ Excisional biopsy with 1-3 mm margins □ Urgent dermatology/surgical referral □ Patient education on self-examination


Key Documentation Principles:

When to refer urgently 3: Any lesion with ABCD-positive features (asymmetry, irregular borders, color heterogeneity, diameter >5mm), any changing lesion, lesions with ≥3 colors, itching/bleeding lesions, or lesions that don't fit the patient's nevus pattern.

Critical pitfall: Many primary melanomas now present with diameter <5mm 1, so do not rely solely on the "D" criterion. Evolution (change) and the "ugly duckling" sign are equally important 1.

Dermoscopy note: If trained in dermoscopy, this enhances diagnostic accuracy 1, but visual examination alone using ABCD criteria is sufficient for determining need for biopsy or referral.

Complete skin examination 3, 2: Always examine the entire skin surface including scalp and all regional lymph nodes when evaluating any pigmented lesion, as this identifies additional primaries and metastases.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.