What is the ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade for prostate cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 11, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

ISUP Grade for Prostate Cancer

The ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade is a 5-tier grading system (Grade Groups 1-5) that replaced the traditional Gleason score reporting and provides superior prognostic stratification for prostate cancer patients.

The ISUP Grading System

The ISUP grade groups directly correspond to Gleason scores as follows 1:

  • ISUP Grade Group 1: Gleason score ≤6 (3+3)
  • ISUP Grade Group 2: Gleason score 7 (3+4)
  • ISUP Grade Group 3: Gleason score 7 (4+3)
  • ISUP Grade Group 4: Gleason score 8 (4+4,3+5+3)
  • ISUP Grade Group 5: Gleason score 9-10 (4+5+4,5+5)

Key Clinical Implementation Points

Both the traditional Gleason score AND the ISUP grade group should be reported on pathology reports 1. The ISUP system was specifically designed to improve patient communication while maintaining prognostic accuracy.

Critical Reporting Requirements

Each biopsy site must include 2:

  • Location
  • Gleason score
  • ISUP grade group
  • Extent of disease
  • Presence of lymphovascular invasion (if identified)
  • Extraprostatic extension (if present)
  • Intraductal carcinoma and invasive cribriform pattern (independent factors for metastasis and cancer-specific survival)

Prognostic Significance

The ISUP grading system demonstrates clear prognostic stratification for cancer-specific survival and biochemical recurrence 3:

8-year outcomes in radiotherapy-treated patients:

  • Grade Group 1: 90% BCF-free, 98% DM-free
  • Grade Group 2: 82% BCF-free, 96% DM-free
  • Grade Group 3: 74% BCF-free, 92% DM-free
  • Grade Group 4: 71% BCF-free, 88% DM-free
  • Grade Group 5: 58% BCF-free, 83% DM-free

In organ-confined disease after radical prostatectomy, 7-year cancer-specific survival rates are 99.6% for Grade Groups 1-3,98.2% for Grade Group 4, and 93.8% for Grade Group 5 4.

Important Clinical Caveats

MRI-Targeted Biopsy Grade Shift

MRI-targeted biopsies detect higher-grade cancer more sensitively than systematic biopsies, meaning ISUP Grade Group 2 cancers detected by MRI-targeted biopsy have better prognosis on average than those detected by systematic biopsy alone 2. Interpret MRI-targeted biopsy results with this grade shift in mind.

Active Surveillance Exclusions

Patients with cribriform or intraductal histology must be excluded from active surveillance 2. ISUP Grade Group 3 disease should also be excluded from active surveillance protocols 2.

Percentage Pattern 4 Reporting

For ISUP Grade Group 2 tumors with minimal pattern 4 (<10%), reporting the percentage of pattern 4 helps determine active surveillance eligibility 2.

Central Pathology Review

There is poor agreement (κ = 0.19) between local and central pathology-derived grade groups 3, emphasizing the importance of expert pathology review in clinical trials and complex cases.

Treatment Implications by Grade Group

The current EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines stratify treatment based on ISUP grade groups 2:

  • Grade Group 1: Active surveillance is strongly recommended for patients with life expectancy >10 years
  • Grade Group 2: Selected patients with favorable features may be offered active surveillance (weak recommendation)
  • Grade Group 3: Requires metastatic screening with at least cross-sectional imaging and bone scan; PSMA PET/CT if available
  • Grade Groups 4-5: Mandatory metastatic screening with PSMA PET/CT if available

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.