What are the clinical studies comparing Dupilumab (Dupixent) vs. Lebrikizumab for atopic dermatitis cases in patients 12 years and above?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Dupilumab is the preferred treatment option for atopic dermatitis in patients 12 years and above due to its more extensive long-term safety data and established efficacy in reducing disease severity and improving quality of life, as compared to lebrikizumab which has a similar mechanism of action but less extensive safety data 1.

Key Considerations

  • Both dupilumab and lebrikizumab are monoclonal antibodies targeting the IL-13 pathway, with dupilumab also targeting IL-4.
  • Dupilumab is FDA-approved for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in patients 6 months and older, while lebrikizumab was more recently approved for atopic dermatitis in patients 12 years and older.
  • In separate clinical trials, both medications have shown efficacy in reducing disease severity and improving quality of life.
  • Common side effects for both include injection site reactions and conjunctivitis.

Treatment Recommendations

  • Dupilumab is typically administered as a 600mg loading dose followed by 300mg every other week.
  • Lebrikizumab is given as a 500mg loading dose followed by 250mg every two weeks.
  • When choosing between these medications, consider factors such as insurance coverage, patient preference for injection frequency, and individual response.
  • A trial of either medication for at least 16 weeks is recommended to assess efficacy before considering a switch to the alternative option, as suggested by recent guidelines 1.

Ocular Surface Disorders

  • Both dupilumab and lebrikizumab have been associated with an increased risk of ocular surface disorders, including conjunctivitis.
  • Close monitoring and liaison with ophthalmology is essential, especially in children and patients with a history of ocular surface disorders 1.

From the Research

Clinical Studies Comparing Dupilumab vs. Lebrikizumab for Atopic Dermatitis

  • There are no direct clinical studies comparing dupilumab vs. lebrikizumab for 12 years and above atopic dermatitis cases in the provided evidence.

Available Studies on Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis

  • A study published in 2021 2 demonstrated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adolescents (12-17 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
  • Another study published in 2020 3 showed that dupilumab is safer and more efficient than immunosuppressive drugs in treating severe atopic dermatitis.
  • A review of real-world data on the long-term safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis patients found that it is well-tolerated, but ocular adverse events are not rare 4.
  • A phase 3 open-label extension study published in 2020 5 found that dupilumab shows long-term safety and efficacy in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

Combination of Dupilumab with Other Monoclonal Antibodies

  • A study published in 2023 6 found that the combination of dupilumab with other monoclonal antibodies may be safe, but the evidence is modest and more research is needed to confirm this.

Limitations

  • There are no clinical studies directly comparing dupilumab vs. lebrikizumab for 12 years and above atopic dermatitis cases in the provided evidence.
  • More research is needed to fully understand the safety and efficacy of dupilumab in combination with other monoclonal antibodies.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.