What is the best treatment for a 38-year-old woman with intermittent right flank pain, a computed tomography (CT) scan showing delayed filling of the right upper pole, an anterial caliceal diverticulum containing an 8 millimeter (mm) stone, and suspected nephrolithiasis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The best treatment for this 38-year-old woman with an 8 mm stone in a right upper pole calyceal diverticulum causing intermittent flank pain is either Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) or Ureteroscopy (URS), as both options are acceptable for symptomatic patients with a total non-lower pole renal stone burden ≤ 20 mm. According to the American Urological Association/Endourological Society guideline 1, for cumulative stone burdens <20 mm, stone-free rates for both URS and SWL are acceptable and have less morbidity than PCNL.

Key Considerations

  • The stone size is 8 mm, which is well within the recommended threshold for SWL or URS 1.
  • The location of the stone is in a calyceal diverticulum, which may pose technical challenges for URS, but SWL can be effective in such cases.
  • PCNL is generally recommended for stone burdens >20 mm 1, but it may not be necessary for smaller stones like in this case.

Treatment Options

  • SWL: This is a non-invasive procedure that uses shock waves to break up the stone into smaller fragments that can then pass out of the body in the urine. SWL is a good option for smaller stones like in this case 1.
  • URS: This is a minimally invasive procedure that involves using a small scope to visualize the stone and then removing it or breaking it up with a laser. URS is also a good option for smaller stones, but it may be technically more challenging for upper pole diverticula 1.

Expected Outcomes

  • Both SWL and URS have acceptable stone-free rates for smaller stones like in this case 1.
  • The patient can expect a relatively quick recovery time, with most patients able to return to normal activities within a few days to a week after the procedure.
  • The choice between SWL and URS will depend on the patient's individual circumstances and the surgeon's preference 1.

From the Research

Treatment Options for 8 mm Stone in Caliceal Diverticulum

  • The patient has an 8 mm stone in a caliceal diverticulum, which is a complex condition requiring careful consideration of treatment options.
  • According to the study by 2, mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) is a versatile tool for removing kidney stones, including those in caliceal diverticula.
  • The study by 3 suggests that flexible ureteroscopy can be an option for stones located in the diverticular neck or a diverticulum, but the size of the stone and the anatomy of the diverticulum must be considered.

Considerations for Treatment

  • The size of the stone (8 mm) is relatively small, but its location in a caliceal diverticulum makes it a challenging case.
  • The study by 4 compared the outcomes of PCNL, flexible ureteroscopy, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower pole stones of 10-20 mm, and found that PCNL provided a higher stone-free rate than flexible ureteroscopy and ESWL.
  • However, the study by 3 suggests that ESWL can be considered as an option for stones between 10 and 20 mm in size, if the anatomy is favorable.

Recommended Treatment

  • Based on the available evidence, mini-PCNL (2) or flexible ureteroscopy (3) may be considered as treatment options for the 8 mm stone in the caliceal diverticulum.
  • The choice of treatment will depend on the individual patient's anatomy and the surgeon's expertise.
  • Further evaluation and discussion with a urologist are necessary to determine the best course of treatment for this patient.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.