What is the interpretation of Kappa (Kappa statistic) agreement values?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Kappa agreement values should be interpreted with caution, considering the context and potential limitations, with values above 0.80 generally indicating almost perfect agreement, as seen in the study by 1. When evaluating kappa statistics, it's essential to consider the numerical range, with higher values indicating better inter-rater reliability. The interpretation of kappa values is as follows:

  • Kappa values below 0.00 indicate poor agreement
  • 0.00-0.20 indicate slight agreement
  • 0.21-0.40 indicate fair agreement
  • 0.41-0.60 indicate moderate agreement, as noted in the study by 1 with a Cohen’s Kappa of 0.58
  • 0.61-0.80 indicate substantial agreement
  • 0.81-1.00 indicate almost perfect agreement However, these interpretations are somewhat arbitrary guidelines rather than strict rules. Context matters significantly, and in high-stakes clinical decisions, kappa values above 0.80 might be required, while in exploratory research, lower values might be acceptable. The study by 1 highlights the importance of considering the limitations of kappa values, as the relatively low agreement score was partially driven by discrepancies in determining whether the item was not present or not applicable. Additionally, the prevalence of the observed phenomenon can affect kappa values, with very high or very low prevalence potentially producing misleadingly low kappa despite high observed agreement, known as the kappa paradox. It's also important to consider the number of categories being rated, as more categories typically result in lower kappa values. When reporting kappa statistics, it's recommended to include confidence intervals to indicate precision and consider supplementing with percent agreement for a more complete picture of reliability.

From the Research

Kappa Agreement Values Interpretation

The kappa statistic is a measure of interobserver agreement that takes into account the fact that observers will sometimes agree or disagree simply by chance 2. A kappa of 1 indicates perfect agreement, whereas a kappa of 0 indicates agreement equivalent to chance.

  • Kappa values can be interpreted as follows:
    • A kappa of 1 indicates perfect agreement
    • A kappa of 0 indicates agreement equivalent to chance
  • The kappa statistic is affected by the prevalence of the finding under observation, and methods to overcome this limitation have been described 2
  • Kappa coefficients are measures of correlation between categorical variables often used as reliability or validity coefficients 3

Factors Influencing Kappa Values

Several factors can influence the magnitude of kappa, including:

  • Prevalence: the kappa statistic is affected by the prevalence of the finding under observation 2, 4
  • Bias: kappa can be influenced by bias in the ratings or observations 4
  • Non-independent ratings: kappa can be affected by non-independent ratings or observations 4
  • Baserate: the response of kappa to differing baserates was examined, and results suggest that setting a single value of kappa as "minimally acceptable" is not useful in ensuring adequate accuracy of observers 5

Interpreting Kappa Values

  • Kappa values can be used to estimate the accuracy of observers, and guidelines are given for selecting a criterion accuracy level 5
  • The use and interpretation of kappa is illustrated with examples from musculoskeletal research, and factors that can influence the magnitude of kappa are discussed 4
  • Analytic formulas and graphs can be used to connect kappa with other measures of agreement, such as sensitivity and specificity 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Kappa coefficients in medical research.

Statistics in medicine, 2002

Research

Interpreting kappa in observational research: baserate matters.

American journal of mental retardation : AJMR, 2006

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.